PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Brady & Manning against common opponents


Status
Not open for further replies.
How many times have they been the #1 seed this decade? Or had a bye week wrapped up? How many times did they win a SB? Being the #1 seed isn't a guarantee... 2007 Patriots are the best example of that... 16-0 regular season, 2-1 post season...

The Colts have put themselves in the best position they can to make a run.
 
Sorry I don't speak but and what if. Not when your own Pats fan just called Manning the stat beast.

Correction, you did use the if Manning was with the Pats and had a better defense.

Marino was a stat beast. 2 seasons of 40 tds. Manning only 1.
 
The Colts have put themselves in the best position they can to make a run.

That is true... But you keep using wording that makes an indication that they've got the SB all wrapped up... Which is indeed a false statement at this point. And what we CAN look at, doesn't look good for them, given their history of resting and then losing.

Those fact are unfortunately for you, indisputable, so talking in relative absolutes about the Colts being SB winners already should cease from this point on.
 
That is true... But you keep using wording that makes an indication that they've got the SB all wrapped up... Which is indeed a false statement at this point. And what we CAN look at, doesn't look good for them, given their history of resting and then losing.

Those fact are unfortunately for you, indisputable, so talking in relative absolutes about the Colts being SB winners already should cease from this point on.

I'm not going into that argument in this thread. I made this a great thread about the position of Quarterback.
 
We've had to listen to the media year after year after year asking "who's going to stop the Manning led Colts?....as if it was going to be an impossible hurddle. Well the Pats did a couple of times, the Steelers did once and the the Chargers did. One freaking time did the Colts win the SB and it was in spite of Mannings post season performance not because of it. He may rise to the occasion this year, who knows? Come back then and you may have a better argument.

And please explain to us again why Mannings indoor career coupled with a southern division isn't an advantage over a northern outdoor team's quarterback. This time no spin. Deal?
 
Someone needs to call an ambulance. I think all oxygen to The QB's brain got cut off around the second page of this thread.
 
We can throw this stuff around all we want, but I think that we're the only ones who listen.

It's a statement of fact that Manning has had every possible advantage in his career, including playing in a dome, having top shelf receivers, and playing in a division with two expansion teams. Not to mention the nonsensical move to the AFC South in the first place, which means that even his outdoor games are going to be warm. I've never seen an explanation for why Miami didn't move to the AFC South, by the way, seeing as they're, I dunno, IN THE SAME STATE AS ANOTHER TEAM IN THE AFC SOUTH.

Do you always speak like this?

You got to tee off on the worst Dolphins team in their history in 2007, the Jets who are normally epic failures regardless how good they look at certain points, and the 0-4 in Super Bowls in the 1990's Buffalo Bills.

Are you also aware that the AFC South in 2007 had the best winning percentage of any division all time? Did you also know that in 2008 the Titans, a team in the Colts division, had the best record in the NFL at 13-3 last season? Are you also aware that the Jaguars and Texans have been on the rise and have been picked to knock us off due to their potential alone? Our division is no joke, you are completely over exaggerating your argument.

And yeah, Manning had top shelf receivers in 1998, 1999, 2000, and 2001 when Terrence Wilkins and Jerome Pathon were his second and third receivers. He was also blessed with talent in 2007 when Marvin went down and he had a CFL bum starting a running back and a rookie starting at the #1 WR slot. 2008 was also blessed with talent with the worst running game in the NFL next to Arizona, a liability in Marvin at #1, and a makeshift offensive line that couldn't stay healthy if their lives depended on it.

I know this is a Patriots forum, but posts like these are a little ridiculous and overboard.
 
Do you always speak like this?

You got to tee off on the worst Dolphins team in their history in 2007, the Jets who are normally epic failures regardless how good they look at certain points, and the 0-4 in Super Bowls in the 1990's Buffalo Bills.

Are you also aware that the AFC South in 2007 had the best winning percentage of any division all time? Did you also know that in 2008 the Titans, a team in the Colts division, had the best record in the NFL at 13-3 last season? Are you also aware that the Jaguars and Texans have been on the rise and have been picked to knock us off due to their potential alone? Our division is no joke, you are completely over exaggerating your argument.

And yeah, Manning had top shelf receivers in 1998, 1999, 2000, and 2001 when Terrence Wilkins and Jerome Pathon were his second and third receivers. He was also blessed with talent in 2007 when Marvin went down and he had a CFL bum starting a running back and a rookie starting at the #1 WR slot. 2008 was also blessed with talent with the worst running game in the NFL next to Arizona, a liability in Marvin at #1, and a makeshift offensive line that couldn't stay healthy if their lives depended on it.

I know this is a Patriots forum, but posts like these are a little ridiculous and overboard.

But they won a SB 6 years ago! :D

They know all!
 
You won one 3 years ago and counting after this year. Your Atlanta Braves championship is in the past too. And you are the obsessed ones on a Pats forum. Shouldn't you be worrying about wanting to lynch Polian?
 
The Colts have put themselves in the best position they can to make a run.

Per Polian tonight they would have lost even if Manning stayed in. Big problems in Indy :D
 
I'm not going into that argument in this thread. I made this a great thread about the position of Quarterback.

I didn't bother reading thru the entire thread so I apologize if this has been stated already in this Manning vs Brady debate. But it's very simple, Manning has a LOSING record in the playoffs. 7 -8. I get that most Indy fans don't understand the importance of this fact, after all, most are just hillbillies, but it's pretty important. When Manning has a winning record in the postseason, there can be a discussion, until then, it's not an argument. You're welcome.
 
Last edited:
Do you always speak like this?

You got to tee off on the worst Dolphins team in their history in 2007, the Jets who are normally epic failures regardless how good they look at certain points, and the 0-4 in Super Bowls in the 1990's Buffalo Bills.

Are you also aware that the AFC South in 2007 had the best winning percentage of any division all time? Did you also know that in 2008 the Titans, a team in the Colts division, had the best record in the NFL at 13-3 last season? Are you also aware that the Jaguars and Texans have been on the rise and have been picked to knock us off due to their potential alone? Our division is no joke, you are completely over exaggerating your argument.

And yeah, Manning had top shelf receivers in 1998, 1999, 2000, and 2001 when Terrence Wilkins and Jerome Pathon were his second and third receivers. He was also blessed with talent in 2007 when Marvin went down and he had a CFL bum starting a running back and a rookie starting at the #1 WR slot. 2008 was also blessed with talent with the worst running game in the NFL next to Arizona, a liability in Marvin at #1, and a makeshift offensive line that couldn't stay healthy if their lives depended on it.

I know this is a Patriots forum, but posts like these are a little ridiculous and overboard.

Yeah, he only had a Hall-of-Famer at #1 during 98-01 (and a probable HOF-er at RB). Anyway, his record through those years (32-32) kind of proves my point, regardless.

If your argument is that the division was great two years ago, that it occasionally puts up a good team in addition to the Colts, and that people have predicted the Texans or the Jags would knock them off...then have fun with that. Way to name the highs of the AFCS but the lows of the AFCE to make your argument. It's not like Miami won the division recently or anything.

I love how you completely omit your namesake from your post, by the way. Apparently, Wayne isn't worth mentioning when it comes to a discussion of the talent that Manning has always had around him. And Dallas Clark says, "Hi."

Now address the dome and warm weather advantage, because the other guy pretends it doesn't exist.
 
Yeah, he only had a Hall-of-Famer at #1 during 98-01 (and a probable HOF-er at RB). Anyway, his record through those years (32-32) kind of proves my point, regardless.

I am nearly positive he used a plural. I realize he had one hall of fame WR. Brady has Randy Moss and Wes Welker. Say Brady had Randy Moss at #1 and no Wes Welker?

I've skimmed this forum, and the complaining about depth has been endless. Manning had no depth. He had one great wide receiver from 1998-2001. Your community is sitting here lobbying for a 3rd and 4th receiver, saying Brady doesn't have enough weapons although he has two great receivers. Manning only had ONE great receiver and still had a 33 TD MVP type season in his second year. So let me get this straight, Manning is "loaded" with weapons with one great WR while Brady doesn't have enough weapons with two great WRs? Choose your standard, then get back at me.

Your argument about his record is a joke. He came into a team that was in the gutter, 3-13 the year he came. They were troubled in every aspect of the game, and he can only do so much when he got there. Take away that 3-13 season, and you have a 29-19 record. Look at that, his entire record skewed by one season with a horrible team. Luckily for Brady, he stepped into a luxury by doing nothing all rookie season and walking into a Belichick coached team, not the #1 draft pick being thrown into the wolves in his first season.

If your argument is that the division was great two years ago, that it occasionally puts up a good team in addition to the Colts, and that people have predicted the Texans or the Jags would knock them off...then have fun with that. Way to name the highs of the AFCS but the lows of the AFCE to make your argument. It's not like Miami won the division recently or anything.

The division was great two years ago. Do I need to spell it out? They had the best winning percentage for a division in NFL history in 2007.

Jacksonville was 9-7 in 2004, 12-4 in 2005, and 11-5 in 2007. The Titans were 12-4 in 2003, 10-6 in 2007, and 13-3 in 2008. The Texans have been an explosive team for a while. Keep in mind that the Colts never had the luxury of facing a team as bad as the 2007 Dolphins, they were one of the worst teams in NFL history. The Colts division has been no cake walk, and if these facts aren't good enough to convince you, then so be it.

I love how you completely omit your namesake from your post, by the way. Apparently, Wayne isn't worth mentioning when it comes to a discussion of the talent that Manning has always had around him. And Dallas Clark says, "Hi."

Wayne wasn't there till 2002. That's a start.

Clark wasn't even a consistently used target in the offense until 2007. Look it up.

Also, you missed the plural again. When I mentioned the 2007 and 2008 seasons, I didn't mention Wayne because he isn't more then one weapon. He's one weapon out there, you act as if Manning has been surrounded by hall of fame talent at WR, RB, TE, OG, OT, FB, OC, HC, and QB Coach. One of those hall of fame Riddell employees must have put together that hall of fame helmet too. Get a grip.

Now address the dome and warm weather advantage, because the other guy pretends it doesn't exist.

What do you want me to address about it? You act as if Brady's been throwing touchdowns in a typhoon is entire career and deserves some special recognition.
 
Last edited:
A little fun fact:

Peyton's 04 QB Rating - 121.106.
Brady's 07 QB Rating - 117.178.

Peyton's QB Rating of defenses faced: 84.541.
Brady's QB Rating of defenses faced: 79.676.

Peyton's QB Rating Difference: 36.565.
Brady's QB Rating Difference: 37.502.
 
I like Tom Brady more

he wins more superbowls
 
What do you want me to address about it? You act as if Brady's been throwing touchdowns in a typhoon is entire career and deserves some special recognition.
Just the opposite. Manning's 8-9 games per year in near perfect conditions deserve some special consideration when comparing the two.
 
I am nearly positive he used a plural. I realize he had one hall of fame WR. Brady has Randy Moss and Wes Welker. Say Brady had Randy Moss at #1 and no Wes Welker?

I've skimmed this forum, and the complaining about depth has been endless. Manning had no depth. He had one great wide receiver from 1998-2001. Your community is sitting here lobbying for a 3rd and 4th receiver, saying Brady doesn't have enough weapons although he has two great receivers. Manning only had ONE great receiver and still had a 33 TD MVP type season in his second year. So let me get this straight, Manning is "loaded" with weapons with one great WR while Brady doesn't have enough weapons with two great WRs? Choose your standard, then get back at me.

I love how you cherry picked one season instead of looking at his entire career.

Your argument about his record is a joke. He came into a team that was in the gutter, 3-13 the year he came. They were troubled in every aspect of the game, and he can only do so much when he got there. Take away that 3-13 season, and you have a 29-19 record. Look at that, his entire record skewed by one season with a horrible team.
I seem to recall another losing season.

Luckily for Brady, he stepped into a luxury by doing nothing all rookie season and walking into a Belichick coached team, not the #1 draft pick being thrown into the wolves in his first season.
Brady's rookie year, the team was 5 - 11, and when he had to step in and start, the team was winless.

Wayne wasn't there till 2002. That's a start.

Clark wasn't even a consistently used target in the offense until 2007. Look it up.
It's not like Peyton had an all pro and future HOFer running backs to help take off the load until he got Wayne and Clarke.

Also, you missed the plural again. When I mentioned the 2007 and 2008 seasons, I didn't mention Wayne because he isn't more then one weapon. He's one weapon out there, you act as if Manning has been surrounded by hall of fame talent at WR, RB, TE, OG, OT, FB, OC, HC, and QB Coach. One of those hall of fame Riddell employees must have put together that hall of fame helmet too. Get a grip.
Bolded are future HOFers.


What do you want me to address about it? You act as if Brady's been throwing touchdowns in a typhoon is entire career and deserves some special recognition.

It's not like he has to play in blizzards in the winter at home while Peyton gets to play in a nice comfy dome or anything . . . oh wait.
 
I love how you cherry picked one season instead of looking at his entire career.

He had no more then one elite WR in 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2007 (Marvin injury), 2008, and 2009. I counted seven seasons there. I don't know the system in which you count.

I seem to recall another losing season.

So what? 12+ wins for seven straight years is completely irrelevant? That losing season has nothing to do with the argument I was making towards the other poster.

Brady's rookie year, the team was 5 - 11, and when he had to step in and start, the team was winless.

Right. Were they a team in complete makeover rebuilding mode? Do you have any idea how bad the Colts were? Was Brady a #1 pick under that type of pressure, thrown into the starting position and asked to pass the ball over 500 times in his first season? Don't compare the situations, it's really not even close.


It's not like Peyton had an all pro and future HOFer running backs to help take off the load until he got Wayne and Clarke.

He had Faulk for one season in the midst of a disaster on a team that wasn't going anywhere, more so a meaningless year. I am aware he had Edge. Is Edge a WR? And look at Edge in the playoffs, thank god we got Addai, he actually knows how to be somewhat effective when he needs to.

Also, you missed the plural again. When I mentioned the 2007 and 2008 seasons, I didn't mention Wayne because he isn't more then one weapon. He's one weapon out there, you act as if Manning has been surrounded by hall of fame talent at WR, RB, TE, OG, OT, FB, OC, HC, and QB Coach. One of those hall of fame Riddell employees must have put together that hall of fame helmet too. Get a grip.
Bolded are future HOFers.

Wayne isn't a hall of fame WR yet. He has one hall of fame WR and a hall of fame head coach. Brady has a hall of fame WR and a hall of fame head coach, yet he doesn't have enough weapons this year and needs more depth despite Wes Welker. Edge is borderline hall of fame. He also doesn't need Edge to warrant a passing game, most Colts fans don't even remember him.


It's not like he has to play in blizzards in the winter at home while Peyton gets to play in a nice comfy dome or anything . . . oh wait.

Oh yes, a typical Patriots fans exaggerating and lying about the standards to raise the bar and make it out as if Brady is godly.

How many blizzards has Brady played in this year? One? So why use the plural? Using the plural, you make your argument sound as if he plays in five blizzards per season.

Manning's numbers outdoors are also better then his indoor numbers this season.
 
Oh yes, a typical Patriots fans exaggerating and lying about the standards to raise the bar and make it out as if Brady is godly.

How many blizzards has Brady played in this year? One? So why use the plural? Using the plural, you make your argument sound as if he plays in five blizzards per season.

Manning's numbers outdoors are also better then his indoor numbers this season.
Are we talking about this year only? Seems like you discuss career numbers/situations and single season numbers only when it suits your argument. If you want to discuss this years numbers only, perhaps try re-reading the OP. Pretty interesting comparison.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/23: News and Notes
MORSE: Final 7 Round Patriots Mock Draft, Matthew Slater News
Bruschi’s Proudest Moment: Former LB Speaks to MusketFire’s Marshall in Recent Interview
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/22: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-21, Kraft-Belichick, A.J. Brown Trade?
MORSE: Patriots Draft Needs and Draft Related Info
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/19: News and Notes
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf’s Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/18/24
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/18: News and Notes
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/17: News and Notes
Back
Top