AFPatsFan12
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2005
- Messages
- 546
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I tend to like the guys who worked in NFl front offices like Lombardi, Casserly etc... i don't always agree with what they say but they understand how things work and have been there, so theres always a logic behind what they say
I don't like Clayton.... Hoge annoyes me (he's just an annoying guy) but he's been spot on about somethings recently... like when the rest of the media was praising Vince Young for "winning the games" he called him out and said he was bad... and he was 100% right
During the draft, i love Mayock when he breaks down film... but i hate how he always says how he's 100% right all the time, he get's the best info and is wrong just as much as everyone else.
oh and hey james!
I totally agree with what is being said here about Reiss. He doesn't play up the negative, stir the pot as Felger does and he does many things that other writers NEVER do. When he gets it wrong, it's always a correction and an apology...simple easy and yet few EVER do that, even if they have it REALLY wrong. He does work hard at things..digging and attempting to get it right, as opposed to first and OOOPS!! It is quite level headed and even..and he's usually there first with things. I really liked his Sunday piece on injuries and took on the NFL and it's flawed study. A BIT of a change for him, but the piece was well done and right to the point. I wish there were more of those; maybe in the future.You guys are clearly out of your minds if you're dismissing Reiss as a "homer" or "in the pocket" of the team or as "a platform for Patriot controlled media."
The guy has been critical of the team when necessary, he provides more in-depth analysis of the team's play calling and defensive schemes anyone else, and the reason he gets all the news is not because the team gives it to him, but because the guy is always working, always on the phone, always looking for articles on-line, and probably hangs out in the parking lot at Gillette when no one else is around just seeing if he can find out something new.
He gets dismissed as a homer because he's not out there "in your face" negative about things or ranting and raving about things like a Mike Felger.
He's been critical of the team, he just doesn't scream it at you. Like all his reporting, it's level and even-handed.
The guy works hard.
The praise of King, Clayton and of all people Mortenson, is laughable. Those guys are nothing more than fat cats, who are part of a good ol' boy network of football commentators, who repeat the same things that they hear elsewhere from the little guys, and occasionally get a story by someone who needs or received a favor.
I look forward to seeing him as well.Maybe he's not there quite yet, but ...
Rodney Harrison.
A true student of the game, level-headed, insightful. This guy will be one to watch.
Forgive my laziness in not checking the rest of the thread, but frankly, the best media coverage of the Patriots - and this includes, in fact especially includes, the criticism - is at Official Website of the New England Patriots. Some will say that it's "too inside," which is an easy out, but the fact is, the most detailed, inside-baseball, detail-oriented yet wide-ranging coverage of the Patriots comes from their own, relatively independent minded website.
Fred, Paul, Andy and Erik may not break stories - that's one limitation their job description prohibits - but their analysis and reporting is the equal of anyone mentioned in this thread, which is both a compliment to them, and a diss of (most of) the media on the Patriots' beat. They may joke around a bit on the radio show - 'though I'd argue even then their reporting is top-notch - but the website and the paper are fantastic sources of entertaining, but informative, stuff.
I really can not agree here..Maybe I should give them another listen, but I have been up and down with these guys. A few years ago, I used to listen all the time. It was one hour a week in the offseason and a LOT of what I heard was interesting and informative, even though there was a lot of lightness and humor. But then I really got tired of the same old inside jokes and there was even less real football even though they were on for two hours. At one point, I just got sick of them.. maybe two years ago. and really thought they were more an embarrassment than anything close to top notch and stopped listening. It is possible they have improved as people have come and gone, and maybe I would listen again, but for now, it's not a thumbs up.Forgive my laziness in not checking the rest of the thread, but frankly, the best media coverage of the Patriots - and this includes, in fact especially includes, the criticism - is at Official Website of the New England Patriots. Some will say that it's "too inside," which is an easy out, but the fact is, the most detailed, inside-baseball, detail-oriented yet wide-ranging coverage of the Patriots comes from their own, relatively independent minded website.
Fred, Paul, Andy and Erik may not break stories - that's one limitation their job description prohibits - but their analysis and reporting is the equal of anyone mentioned in this thread, which is both a compliment to them, and a diss of (most of) the media on the Patriots' beat. They may joke around a bit on the radio show - 'though I'd argue even then their reporting is top-notch - but the website and the paper are fantastic sources of entertaining, but informative, stuff.