PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

#23, #34, #47, #58


Status
Not open for further replies.
I got thinking about that more after posting...was Brooking a first rounder? It seems there are a number of quality MLB types in this draft for Atlanta's defense.

In which case they will draft a linebacker in the 1st instead and Delmas might drop to the top of round 2 for the Pats pick.
 
Sorry but I'm not getting the Barwin thing as a top 50 pick for the Pats. What does everyone else see (outside of the combine numbers) that I'm missing?

Dude has one year of production on defense. 7 of his 10 sacks came against Eastern Kentucky, Miami (the Ohio one), Marshall, Rutgers (1-4 at the time, only win against Morgan State) and a poor Hawaii team that chucks the ball over 40 times a game. The other 3 came against Pitt. Nada against the other (generally "better") teams on the schedule. Against Oklahoma, Connecticut, West Virginia and Louisville he had 4 solo tackles COMBINED. Yet no mention of stats against inferior competition and coming up small against better teams.

What game film are people using to make him a must-have for the Pats? He is fast and a pest in the backfield, but he has clearly not demonstrated much on run defense. 26 solos in 12 games? And he was consistently moved off the POA in the UConn game (the only Cincy game I watched). Haven't mentioned pass coverage because I'm not sure he ever dropped back except on screens. Someone needs to help me here because I am clearly not on the same page as the rest of the board.
 
Last edited:
maybe overrated on Barwin....better value with someone else.....
 
now that we've signed taylor, i would like to see:


1. maybin
2a. bey
2b. sean smith
2c. barwin
 
Barwin won't get passed the first 5 picks of round 2, let alone drop to #58.
 
Sorry but I'm not getting the Barwin thing as a top 50 pick for the Pats. What does everyone else see (outside of the combine numbers) that I'm missing?

Dude has one year of production on defense. 7 of his 10 sacks came against Eastern Kentucky, Miami (the Ohio one), Marshall, Rutgers (1-4 at the time, only win against Morgan State) and a poor Hawaii team that chucks the ball over 40 times a game. The other 3 came against Pitt. Nada against the other (generally "better") teams on the schedule. Against Oklahoma, Connecticut, West Virginia and Louisville he had 4 solo tackles COMBINED. Yet no mention of stats against inferior competition and coming up small against better teams.

What game film are people using to make him a must-have for the Pats? He is fast and a pest in the backfield, but he has clearly not demonstrated much on run defense. 26 solos in 12 games? And he was consistently moved off the POA in the UConn game (the only Cincy game I watched). Haven't mentioned pass coverage because I'm not sure he ever dropped back except on screens. Someone needs to help me here because I am clearly not on the same page as the rest of the board.
Okay, you watched him in one game and are using statistics to fill in the gaps for the rest. I watched 7 Cincinnati games.

I didn't see the Connecticut game, so filling in from the stat line I get this information: 1 solo tackle (a TFL), 1 assist. 1 QBH, 1 blocked kick, 1 PR. So, working against an experienced OT who is expected to crack the first round, Barwin a first year DE was held in check, but had a good game on Special Teams. Of course, filling in with some more stats, the other Cincy starting DE had 7 TT, each of the LB had 5+ TT each, the two starting CBs had 6 TT each, the two Ss had 7+ TT each. I guess we could assume Barwin was just pancaked or otherwise blocked out of the play more often then the others...of course another alternative is UConn didn't run at him as much - it would be nice to find a play chart for that game.

Yes, he's raw, but you can say that about everybody but Sintim and Cushing, and if you want a pass rusher Cushing isn't in the discussion. You complain he had his best games against weaker teams, yet 7 of the of the 13 teams Cincinnati played went to bowl games and Eastern Kentucky was a playoff team in the FCS, add in their Orange Bowl opponent and that's 9 of 14 games were against post-season teams - the talent was there even if they may not have gotten it all in one sock at game time.

As to why I consider him my #1 OLB - his ball awareness. Whether it's finding the RB or checking his rush to get his hands up in the throwing lane, he...finds...the...ball. I noticed that before I noticed he was a good pass rusher, I looked him up because I kept seeing this player check his rush and get his hands up before the QB could release the ball.
 
Barwin won't get passed the first 5 picks of round 2, let alone drop to #58.

i know barwin will probably go sooner and he duplicates maybin too much but he's so versatile, i would love him on our roster. besides, the second round is full of players, someone's bound to drop. maybe a corner drops like butler or harris or an olinemen like robinson or hood.


this could all be a moot point because we probably won't use all three picks anyway. we may look to trade 2b or 2c for a first next year.
 
Last edited:
It happened with Gocong, then it happened with Bradley, crying my eyes out over a Linebacker is getting to be a habit...though my Mayo getting picked last year really did help heal some of the scars of yesteryear. The nice thing about this year, I've got two #1 LBs, one outside, one inside, even if I don't get Barwin in my stocking, there's a fighting chance I'll get Sintim in it instead.

BOR -Bill Parcell's is locking onto Connor Barwin as per his audio interview on
Prime Sports Network

Connors' interview starts at around 32 min mark.
 
Yes, he's raw, but you can say that about everybody but Sintim and Cushing, and if you want a pass rusher Cushing isn't in the discussion.

Agree that Cushing would project inside for the Pats.

You complain he had his best games against weaker teams, yet 7 of the of the 13 teams Cincinnati played went to bowl games and Eastern Kentucky was a playoff team in the FCS, add in their Orange Bowl opponent and that's 9 of 14 games were against post-season teams - the talent was there even if they may not have gotten it all in one sock at game time.

Not really complaining, just making an observation. That seems to be the first point brought up against English but never mentioned for Barwin. I stand by the observation that the majority of his stats (3 sacks against Pitt aside) came against questionable opponents. When he had chances to show his stuff against a level of competition he is likely to encounter on Sunday, his stats are almost non-existent. I didn't include the Orange Bowl because the entire game (including coaching) was a bust for Cincy and it seemed unfair to single out Barwin.

As to why I consider him my #1 OLB - his ball awareness. Whether it's finding the RB or checking his rush to get his hands up in the throwing lane, he...finds...the...ball. I noticed that before I noticed he was a good pass rusher, I looked him up because I kept seeing this player check his rush and get his hands up before the QB could release the ball.

I did notice this as well, particularly on screen recognition. Add in his special teams skills (sweet block in the UConn game and apparently a couple of others on the year) and he has some definitely NFL qualities. I just questions why he is a top 50 player for the Pats without demonstrating the ability to seal the edge on running plays, defeat top-level tackles on the pass rush or drop into coverage...all the things the Pats would ask him to do. He could turn out to be a stud, but he seems like a high bust risk (for the Pats, not in general) at #23 or #34.

By the way, could say a lot of the same things about Matthews but he seems to have less momentum than Barwin on this board.
 
I did notice this as well, particularly on screen recognition. Add in his special teams skills (sweet block in the UConn game and apparently a couple of others on the year) and he has some definitely NFL qualities. I just questions why he is a top 50 player for the Pats without demonstrating the ability to seal the edge on running plays, defeat top-level tackles on the pass rush or drop into coverage...all the things the Pats would ask him to do. He could turn out to be a stud, but he seems like a high bust risk (for the Pats, not in general) at #23 or #34.

By the way, could say a lot of the same things about Matthews but he seems to have less momentum than Barwin on this board.

Because if he showed the ability to do all that against the highest competition, he would be at the top of round 1 with Aaron Curry.

There isn't one single LB or DE in this draft that has proven he can do all of that in a 3-4. All you can do is project that a kid could do it. Barwin projects better than the other kids in the late 1st / early 2nd to be able to it because of his strength, speed, agility, athleticism and awareness.

I like the kid and would like to draft him, but I have no idea where he is going to end up being drafted. I just have a feeling that he won't be available at 47.
 
Because if he showed the ability to do all that against the highest competition, he would be at the top of round 1 with Aaron Curry.

There isn't one single LB or DE in this draft that has proven he can do all of that in a 3-4. All you can do is project that a kid could do it. Barwin projects better than the other kids in the late 1st / early 2nd to be able to it because of his strength, speed, agility, athleticism and awareness.

I like the kid and would like to draft him, but I have no idea where he is going to end up being drafted. I just have a feeling that he won't be available at 47.

:eat1: I am just going to shamelessly jump on the bandwagon of this post. It's not that Barwin is a flawless prospect. It's that I think he's shown the best combination of skills, attitude and pure physical potential among the likely available options.
 
It's not that he is a flawless prospect. It's that I think he's shown the best combination of skills, attitude and pure physical potential among the likely available options.

<BUZZ>

What did Patchick say at closing time Saturday night?

<CHEERS>

I'll take "Famous Last Words" for $400, Alex.
 
I'll take "Famous Last Words" for $400, Alex.

:) OK, so time to make your own stand...nowhere in this thread (or the OLB thread) have you said who you'd take ahead of Barwin at that position. Names?
 
:) OK, so time to make your own stand...nowhere in this thread (or the OLB thread) have you said who you'd take ahead of Barwin at that position. Names?

That's fair. Based on my accuracy in predicting past Pats drafts, my "Last Words" on the subject should have happened years ago.

I'm really not against Barwin per se...just that I don't understand the desire/need to take him early. Outside of Curry (who would likely play every LB position for the Pats), I'm not sure I have an OLB/DE type that I would take at #23 or #34. I guess maybe Orakpo but I'm not a big fan. The rest made their names rushing the QB. Not a bad skill to have and doesn't mean they can't do anything else, IMO it just makes them a bigger risk for the Pats at #23/#34 than secondary or OT options.

Back to your question, if you are talking about pick #47 then Barwin is in the conversation. At that point I would personally go for Michael Johnson ahead of Barwin. Ideal physical makeup for a Pats OLB but questionable consistency. I trust the Pats coaching staff and veterans to maximize Johnson's production than I do Barwin's attitude/motor to translate into success banging into a pulling guard. If you can tell me Barwin can hold up against the run and play well in space (which is what I've been asking for), then Johnson would be the bigger risk and fall behind Barwin.
 
I wouldn't even have M. Johnson on my board. He's a workout warrior that is inconsistent, can't play physical and is horrible against the run. He is far higher risk than C. Barwin.
I highly doubt he will be able to play OLB in a 3-4 system.
 
That's a nifty basket of day-1 picks, especially this year. Off the top of my head, I'd be mighty happy if they could end up with at least 3 players from this list of a dozen:

CB Alphonso Smith
CB Darius Butler
CB/S Sean Smith
DE Tyson Jackson
DE Jarron Gilbert
LB Connor Barwin
LB Clint Sintim
OT William Beatty
OG/C Max Unger
OG Eric Wood
S Louis Delmas
WR Brian Robiskie

Anybody else care to offer a dozen?

This is too much fun...

#23 & #58 traded to Houston for #15 (1080 for Pats picks to 1050 for Houston)
Rey Maualuga, ILB - M & M
#34 - Barwin - OLB
#48 - Louis Delmas

Younger, faster and tougher on defense.
 
I wouldn't even have M. Johnson on my board. He's a workout warrior that is inconsistent, can't play physical and is horrible against the run. He is far higher risk than C. Barwin.
I highly doubt he will be able to play OLB in a 3-4 system.

I'll buy the inconsistent, but are you telling me that Barwin plays more physical and is better against the run? That is a valid perspective, but what are you using to get to that opinion? I am not close to a Barwin expert so I'm looking for a more informed opinion about him, particularly on run defense and dropping into coverage. Don't need any more evidence about speed rush (edge or stunting) or back-side pursuit...easy to see that on film and his combine numbers reinforce that.
 
I'll buy the inconsistent, but are you telling me that Barwin plays more physical and is better against the run? That is a valid perspective, but what are you using to get to that opinion? I am not close to a Barwin expert so I'm looking for a more informed opinion about him, particularly on run defense and dropping into coverage. Don't need any more evidence about speed rush (edge or stunting) or back-side pursuit...easy to see that on film and his combine numbers reinforce that.
NFL Draft Scout profile 'analysis' section:
Positives: Tall with a well-developed upper body. ... Physical at the point of attack. ... Can get under the offensive tackle's pads and push him into the quarterback. ... Has effective stutter and spin moves. ... Relentless as a pass rusher, he also hustles down the line and chases ballcarriers downfield. ... Good backfield awareness to knock down passes and keep contain on reverses, run plays and bootlegs. ... Uses his hands well to keep blockers away and shed to make tackles. ... Stands up on some plays -- may fit as a 3-4 rush linebacker. ... Very coachable because of his intelligence, work ethic and motor. ... A special teams ace since his freshman year; he blocked three punts in 2008. ... Played power forward for the Bearcats' basketball team for two seasons as a walk-on.
Negatives: A bit tight in the hips, is not smooth changing direction or handling coverage in the flat. ... Is not a quick-twitch athlete. ... Although he showed some explosiveness and suddenness off the edge, NFL tackles will be more difficult to beat. ... Inexperienced on defense, played only one season; must continue working on his pass-rushing techniques.
Most of the criticism is centered on his coverage and pass rush technique, after praising him for some rush skills above, nothing negative said about his run play. It all matches with what I've seen on TV.
 
This is too much fun...

#23 & #58 traded to Houston for #15 (1080 for Pats picks to 1050 for Houston)
Rey Maualuga, ILB - M & M
#34 - Barwin - OLB
#48 - Louis Delmas

Younger, faster and tougher on defense.

Nicely done!

Thomas | Maualuga | Mayo | winner of camp battle between Barwin/Woods/Crable -- this could be an ELITE LB corps for years to come.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf’s Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/18/24
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/18: News and Notes
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/17: News and Notes
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/16: News and Notes
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/15: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-14, Mock Draft 3.0, Gilmore, Law Rally For Bill 
Potential Patriot: Boston Globe’s Price Talks to Georgia WR McConkey
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/12: News and Notes
Not a First Round Pick? Hoge Doubles Down on Maye
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/11: News and Notes
Back
Top