Recent content by Gon_Trevil

And this is why I'm pretty certain Pats brass isn't interested in Larry Fitzgerald. I feared Brady was developing too much tunnel vision during his 50 TD season. My fears were confirmed throughout the playoffs, then again in all of '09 and the beginning of '10. He is better off with...

I think Faulk has stated something along the lines of probably retiring if the Pats don't want him.

Long ways? Rodgers and Brees each already has as many rings as Manning, and they've put up MVP numbers consistently for the past few years. So as far as the Manning comparison, they already got toughest part out of the way (the ring). The rest is just keeping up their steady production, which...

No, you don't have the time and energy for that. In fact, nobody does, because such a list does not exist. You do seem to have a lot of time to troll the forums with baseless opinion, though. God forbid looking up facts takes time away from that!

Not that you had any credibility left, but saying that the Lions and "every ****ty bottom dweller for the past decade" never go through draft slumps is kind of way out there even for a troll.

Funny you guys mention quality over quantity. I think quantity increases your chances of striking gold. It also increases your chances of getting more good players. Look at it this way: 2009 Skinny: We get 6 players before the end of round 3. Chung and Vollmer receive starter-type...

So, let's see what we have: 2009: 6 players taken in rounds 2-3 2010: 5 players taken in rounds 1-3 2011: 5 players taken in rounds 1-3 Oh, and we have 4 selections in the first 2 rounds next year. Drafting one guy because the pundits rate him highly does not mean he's the best...

It's ok. You don't need to. Your mother still loves you.

Houston, Bailey, and Acho still out there with our pick up

Quite a few guys that have been linked to the Pats (some as early as for the first round) are still on the board with 56 coming up. Houston, Bailey, Acho, Paea, and Austin were considered good front 7 candidates for us pre-draft. Which probably means we'll pick someone else, but still.

You do realize people are simply asking about a point in your post? Asking to clarify your thoughts on one detail does not mean that people ignored the rest, or that they want to start a war against you.

I hope you're joking.

I understand that the point of the article is that they're trying something new, and so far it appears to be working. However, that string of games doesn't include anyone in the top 10 of NFL starting QBs, let alone anyone elite. And the improved results can also be tied to several other...

I'd suggest making sure you read things correctly before, uhm, commenting about other people's intellectual strengths.

The NFLPA is coming across as the victims-- they take their whining to the media and we only get reports about their side of the story. From my point of view, the owners are keeping business at the negotiating table and out of the tabloids, but people side with the players' whining since...