Recent content by BennyBledsoe

Given how poorly most draft experts do at rating QBs.... that makes me all the more excited about next year's class.

And just remember, it is not just fans or disgruntled players that were confused/frustrated with Patricia/Judge. Plenty of other analysts were calling the PLAY DESIGN trash. Not the players' performance. The design. The thing that is solely the responsibility of the coaches.

Wow, lots of people I can put on full block in here. Nice to know we tolerate this sorta behavior in our fandom. Ugh.

Maybe all these days and months of pride are there to, I don't know, try to have one nice day to say they exist, they're human, they're happy to be who they are when every other day they have to deal with hate, fear, ignorance, violence, and potentially death. Many choose to bury how they feel...

I've heard people talk about that being his eventual job. Guess we're finally there.

Just remember.... from 1992-1995, we went through four different uniform combinations. 1992 - last year of Pat Patriot. 1993 - first year Flying Elvis with red numbers/white outlines on the blues. 1994 - Flying Elvis but now with white numbers/red outlines on the blues 1995 - the radical...

It's a standard pendulum swing. Pete was supposed to be the anti-Parcells. But that was, of course, a much different situation. Pete inherited a literal Super Bowl team. Jerod is...not.

Jalen gonna get Hurts. You know, maybe we've already seen that it does take a toll on him? We'll see if his effectiveness keeps falling off.

Man, venecol, you would be really easy to manipulate. "But that's what the interviews said!" How do we know? WE ALREADY KNOW he manipulated TWO of the interviews in such a way as to upset those who agreed to those interviews. How can we be sure he didn't do it with anybody else's? How can...

But then that's what it is. A story. It's not proof one way or another. I would rate it as highly dubious as a source. If you're just looking for entertainment, sure. But, evidence? Proof? Look elsewhere.

It doesn't matter about the people being interviewed. It matters how everything was being put together. It matters how the questions are framed. That's what biases do. If he's that much of a Kraft fanboy, his choices as to what to leave in and leave out are suspect. I'm guessing people who...

Oof, those quotes from Grazer immediately put this already questionable project into the 'bias' bin. You DEFINITELY can't trust anything in this piece now. Talking the way he did about Kraft is absolutely unacceptable if he wants this to be taken seriously.

Right now, absent any other additions, I'd say we have a top 3 of Douglas, Bourne, and Osborn. I hope they give a longer look at Boutte. Be nice to see what he can do with a good WR coach, a better offense, and a coach who allows more than one rookie mistake for a WR.

He also seems to have ZERO awareness he has any flaws to fix judging by his comments about 'doing his own thing'.

As I've said before... At this point, he had to go. But what Belichick did to this kid's potential was unconscionable. After a pretty successful rookie year, it looks like NOTHING was done to help his second year QB, arguably the most important year in determining a young QB's trajectory...