PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Goodell: New tape would mean more punishment


Status
Not open for further replies.

BadMoFo

Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
7,647
Reaction score
3,620
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_y...bYF?slug=ap-goodell-spygate&prov=ap&type=lgns

Depending on Walsh evidence, Goodell ready to crack down on Pats
Associated Press

Updated: April 24, 2008, 4:18 PM ET

NEW YORK -- Roger Goodell is fully prepared to crack down again on the New England Patriots if his meeting with Matt Walsh uncovers a tape made of the St. Louis Rams' final walkthrough practice before the 2002 Super Bowl.

"Taping a walkthrough is much different from what I punished them for," the NFL commissioner said Thursday at a meeting of a group representing the Associated Press Sports Editors.

After more than two months of negotiations, lawyers for the league and Walsh, the former New England employee, finally reached agreement Wednesday on terms that will allow him to talk Goodell. They include an agreement by the Patriots not to sue Walsh and to pay his legal expenses and his airfare to New York from Hawaii, where he is now a golf pro.

Walsh's name first surfaced just before the Super Bowl, in which the Patriots were upset by the New York Giants after finishing the regular season 16-0 and winning two playoff games. Among the allegations was that the Patriots illegally taped the Rams' final walkthrough before that title game, when New England, a two-touchdown underdog, upset St. Louis 20-17.

Five months before their loss to the Giants, New England coach Bill Belichick was fined $500,000 and the team $250,000 for taping the New York Jets' defensive signals during the season opener. The Patriots also lost their first-round pick in this weekend's draft.

Goodell said Thursday he has no idea what Walsh, who spent six years as a New England employee, has to offer than what the league already knows: Belichick had been taping defensive signals since first becoming Patriots coach in 2000. He noted, however, that the league, which destroyed the tapes from the Jets game after reviewing them, had spoken to 50 people in connection with the case and that Walsh was the only one who asked for legal protection.

Belichick has emphatically denied taping the walkthrough.

"I have never taped a practice, certainly not that one," New England's coach has said repeatedly.

Goodell said his mind is open on the subject.

On other matters, Goodell said:

• He gave no guarantees to owner Jerry Jones or anyone from the Dallas Cowboys that he will reinstate Adam "Pacman" Jones, who the Cowboys obtained in a trade with Tennessee on Wednesday. He expects to meet in June with Pacman Jones, who was suspended all of last season for multiple violations of the league's code of behavior.

• He met this week with his players council and discussed the proposal that would require players' hair that reaches below their name tag being tucked under the helmet.

"It would have to be done in a way that would respect the uniform code and also respect players' rights," he said.

• The NFL is considering moving the draft from New York to other cities. Its contract with Radio City Music Hall, where it will be held this weekend, is in its last year.

• He welcomes the plan by developer Edward P. Roski Jr. to build a 75,000-seat stadium in Los Angeles to help lure back the NFL, which hasn't had a team there since 1994. He noted, however, the league has no plans to expand and no current franchise seems in enough trouble to seek relocation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pre-announcing hypothetical decisions is most injudicious
... for a quasi-judicial authority.

Not to mention bad mojo.
 
Depending on Walsh evidence, Goodell ready to crack down on Pats
Associated Press

Updated: April 24, 2008, 4:18 PM ET

NEW YORK -- Roger Goodell is fully prepared to crack down again on the New England Patriots if his meeting with Matt Walsh uncovers a tape made of the St. Louis Rams' final walkthrough practice before the 2002 Super Bowl.

So just so I understand the commissioner:

If one of us gets a low level job with the Jets, and then, on our own without authorization of the team, decide to sneak into another team's practice, make a video, and hand it over to Goodell, he'll severely punish the Jets?

Sounds like a plan! Who's up for helping dock the Jets their 2009 1st round draft pick!

That's quite the precedent Roger seems ready to set - we should make sure we use it to our advantage.

I'm just wondering if we'll also need to secretly and illegally tape a conversation with the Jets GM and get fired, and then lie about our professional experience and background before he'll consider one of us a "credible" source of information like Walsh.
 
Last edited:
That's not really a revelation, he said that way back when the Patriots were first punish for the whole thing. He's just repeating what he said back then.
 
This is such total BS. He is already setting us up for a crackdown, despite the denials from the coach and the team. Why doesn't he keep his trap shut until all the evidence is presented.
 
This is such total BS. He is already setting us up for a crackdown, despite the denials from the coach and the team. Why doesn't he keep his trap shut until all the evidence is presented.

That's what I'm wondering. If he shut his mouth this wouldn't have become the cluster**** it has become in the first place. His New Sheriff in Town act is so old already.
 
Independent arbitrator.

Jetdell is a transparent catspaw for the Rats and their interests.
 
Hey Roger..I would not pi$$ of the owner that is responsible for doing the TV contracts and could help the other 5 owners sink the CBA.

I don't see how that reflects favorably on our franchise. Should we be treated differently solely b/c our owner is influential?
 
Goodell better step carefully - I don't think Walsh has anything but we all know that Belichick knows enough after 32 years to make Spygate look like a walk in the part. He could break the NFL wide open and if Goodell f*cks him I have little doubt he'll do just that. IMO he took one for the league in September, he's not going to go down alone for a misdemeanor.
 
I don't see how that reflects favorably on our franchise. Should we be treated differently solely b/c our owner is influential?

Why, what team do you represent?
 
I don't think its fair that a team that used to employ the commissioner or a team that has its GM on the competition committee gets prefertial treatment.
 
That's not really a revelation, he said that way back when the Patriots were first punish for the whole thing. He's just repeating what he said back then.

Exactly. This was reported in September when the punishment was first handed out, it was reported in February when the Walsh thing kicked off, and now they are reporting it like it is totally new information again.
 
So Goodell once again said the exact same thing that he said back in September and has said 500,000 times since?

This certainly deserves it own story on every sports web site and a new thread.

Talk about nothing to see here.
 
Last edited:
Oh yeah, I'm a troll because I don't want to use Kraft's influence to keep us out of trouble.
I do want to use it because even if we taped the walkthrough (which I don't think we did), I think we've been overpunished already given that "spying" on practices, etc, has be done and gone unpunished through the history of football.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


MORSE: Patriots Draft Needs and Draft Related Info
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/19: News and Notes
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf’s Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/18/24
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/18: News and Notes
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/17: News and Notes
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/16: News and Notes
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/15: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-14, Mock Draft 3.0, Gilmore, Law Rally For Bill 
Potential Patriot: Boston Globe’s Price Talks to Georgia WR McConkey
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/12: News and Notes
Back
Top