jeffbiologist
Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2007
- Messages
- 1,440
- Reaction score
- 13
I was getting kinda tired reading all these different mocks with unrealistic trade scenarios mixed in with realistic ones. I thought if we could list some realistic ones we could then look under scenario A we did B-type of thing. No long explanations, just a yes or no if they are realistic...and not just from a Patriots point of view, because it has to make sense to the other team too...
A few I see: Baltimore trading with KC to get Ryan/Ellis.
Pats trading with Carolina(7/62 for 13/43)-we get Albert they get Clady/Ellis. This is much more likely if all the top 6 are off the board(Long,Long,Dorsey,Gholston,DMF and Ryan).
Its safe to say that teams trading up have fewer holes, teams trading back generally have more. While possible, I dont think we will be looking to accumulate more picks (2-for-1 trades)as much as we want to make the positions we are drafting more appealing(gaining spots not picks). The hole between 7 and 62 is something my trade addresses.
OK guys, what are some realistic trades??
A few I see: Baltimore trading with KC to get Ryan/Ellis.
Pats trading with Carolina(7/62 for 13/43)-we get Albert they get Clady/Ellis. This is much more likely if all the top 6 are off the board(Long,Long,Dorsey,Gholston,DMF and Ryan).
Its safe to say that teams trading up have fewer holes, teams trading back generally have more. While possible, I dont think we will be looking to accumulate more picks (2-for-1 trades)as much as we want to make the positions we are drafting more appealing(gaining spots not picks). The hole between 7 and 62 is something my trade addresses.
OK guys, what are some realistic trades??