PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Why Chris Long???


Status
Not open for further replies.
Wherever BB wants him. Think Willie McGinest.

Long's head coach, Al Groh, publicly stated that Long can succeed as a DE/OLB. And considering that Groh was the Pats LB coach sent to work out McGinest prior to drafting him, I think I trust his opinion.

Oh he wouldn't just be trying to get his guy drafted #1 by Miami would he?

In addition, Long may have the best hands and technique in the draft. Combined with a relentless motor, these are the qualities he'll be using to defeat NFL OTs. Running a fast 40 won't get you to the QB unless you also have a bag of tricks.

At 3-4 DE, not LB.

I see a D that needs to impact the games more. Speed alone won't get it done.
'

Groh would say anything. He's trying to get his guy drafted #1 by Miami where he would have to play LB. Speed alone will not get it done, but we need it nonetheless.
 
Last edited:
All 3 of these guys played without their hand on the ground before coming to the Pats. Adalius at Baltimore, Vrabel at Pitt, Willie at USC. Like I said before, why would we take a guy at 7 to play LB when he has never played LB in his career?

Sorry, Thomas was a DE in college, not a hand up LB, and McGinest was a weak side DE, not LB at USC as well. Vrabel was also a DE at OSU. None of them played more than a snap or two with their hand up in college so your point is absolutely moot. We're not talking about guys who are already in the NFL, we're talking about a guy coming to the NFL from college. And if you took the time to do a little homework, you would see Long's measurables are comparable to ALL of these guys (heavier AND a bit faster than Vrabel), and his motor is unquestionable. Want to try again chief?
 
You're saying he has versatility becasue he has agility and size??? I already responded to your mention of players IN OUR OWN SYSTEM. He has only played DE - never LB. Where is the "versatility"?
OK, how many of us need to slap you in the face with this? NONE OF THEM PLAYED LB UNTIL THEY GOT TO THE NFL. What the hell aren't you getting about this? Every great OLB we've had in the past 15 years has been a college DE who we transitioned. I swear it's futile, for whatever ******ed reason, you don't want to hear us.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, Thomas was a DE in college, not a hand up LB, and McGinest was a weak side DE, not LB at USC as well. Vrabel was also a DE at OSU. None of them played more than a snap or two with their hand up in college so your point is absolutely moot. We're not talking about guys who are already in the NFL, we're talking about a guy coming to the NFL from college. And if you took the time to do a little homework, you would see Long's measurables are comparable to ALL of these guys (heavier AND a bit faster than Vrabel), and his motor is unquestionable. Want to try again chief?

Please read the post before you respond. It makes you look stupid when you don't. I said "prior to coming to the Pats". That includes Adalius in Baltimore and Vrabel in Pitt. Willie even stated while he was with the Pats that he was asked to play LB more than he would have liked in college. Please fully read the post and do a little research before you respond. You sound like an idiot when you don't.

Also, you're comparing guys that were 4-3 DEs in college vs Long, who was a 3-4 DE. Nice try. 4-3 DE's are asked to some things that are similar to 3-4 LBs, like drop into coverage. 3-4 DE is a totally different position. See Seymour and Warren vs. Freeney, Schoebel, Jared Allen, etc... PLease come up with one college 3-4 DE who made the conversion befre you continue to make your point.
 
Last edited:
Please read the post before you respond. It makes you look stupid when you don't. I said "prior to coming to the Pats". That includes Adalius in Baltimore and Vrabel in Pitt. Willie even stated while he was with the Pats that he was asked to play LB more than he would have liked in college. Please fully read the post and do a little research before you respond. You sound like an idiot when you don't.

Also, you're comparing guys that were 4-3 DEs in college vs Long, who was a 3-4 DE. Nice try. 4-3 DE's are asked to some things that are similar to 3-4 LBs, like drop into coverage. 3-4 DE is a totally different position. See Seymour and Warren vs. Freeney, Schoebel, Jared Allen, etc... PLease come up with one college 3-4 DE who made the conversion befre you continue to make your point.
I read your post chief, it has ZERO relevance...trying to skate on a technicality doesn't make you look smart or better informed than me, though I appreciate your attempt to push that angle. We are talking about drafting a guy, not signing a free agent, so where they played in the NFL prior to coming to the Pats has virtually zero relevance (outside of BB's penchant for wanting experience at the position, which I will grant, but that has no relevance as to whether a guy with comparable body style, agility measurables, and motor can transition AS THE OTHERS MENTIONED DID, as they go from college to the Pros). Long is NOT a prototypical 3-4 DE and you know it, he was thrust into that role in a system and BECAUSE OF HIS VERSATILITY AND PRODUCTIVITY, not because of his body type or his "typical" fit into a D (see Seymore and Warren vs. Freeney, Schoebel, Allen, LONG et al smarta$$). None of the 3 were LBs coming out of college, and ALL OF THE 3 had comparable stats to Long in virtually every category (granted AD had ludicrous 40 times so he doesn't quite compare as evenly, but the weight difference of Vrabel vs. his lack of speed might even it out in the "general" comparison). Don't resort to trying make ridiculous insinuations that I should "research" more before I post, just because I don't feel the need to rehash every moot point doesn't mean you're right.
 
I read your post chief, it has ZERO relevance...trying to skate on a technicality doesn't make you look smart or better informed than me, though I appreciate your attempt to push that angle. We are talking about drafting a guy, not signing a free agent, so where they played in the NFL prior to coming to the Pats has virtually zero relevance (outside of BB's penchant for wanting experience at the position, which I will grant, but that has no relevance as to whether a guy with comparable body style, agility measurables, and motor can transition AS THE OTHERS MENTIONED DID, as they go from college to the Pros). Long is NOT a prototypical 3-4 DE and you know it, he was thrust into that role in a system and BECAUSE OF HIS VERSATILITY AND PRODUCTIVITY, not because of his body type or his "typical" fit into a D (see Seymore and Warren vs. Freeney, Schoebel, Allen, LONG et al smarta$$). None of the 3 were LBs coming out of college, and ALL OF THE 3 had comparable stats to Long in virtually every category (granted AD had ludicrous 40 times so he doesn't quite compare as evenly, but the weight difference of Vrabel vs. his lack of speed might even it out in the "general" comparison). Don't resort to trying make ridiculous insinuations that I should "research" more before I post, just because I don't feel the need to rehash every moot point doesn't mean you're right.

Their NFL experience is relevant sorry to say. You can see how they play the position before you risk sigining them, or in this case, drafting them with the 7th pick in the draft. You're talking to me about relevance?? You've stated he's versatile because he had a decent 40 time and he's big. Nice. The fact that he played DE in a 3-4 is relevant sorry to say. What he was asked to do is not even close to what 3-4 LBs do. But hey, let's just use a top 10 pick on a conversion project.
 
Last edited:
Their NFL experience is relevant sorry to say. You can see how they play the position before you risk sigining them, or in this case, drafting them with the 7th pick in the draft. You're talking to me about relevance?? You've stated he's versatile because he had a decent 40 time (actually it's his cone drills that suggest he's agile chief) and he's big. Nice. The fact that he played DE in a 3-4 is relevant sorry to say. What he was asked to do is not even close to what 3-4 LBs do. But hey, let's just use a top 10 pick on a conversion project.
You're absolutely right, we should trade all our high draft picks for proven veterans, that way we won't have to take a chance on someone who might be really good. Except our coach and their coach have a history, so if their coach tells our coach "hey, coach, this kid reminds me of X", by your logic we should let someone else draft him, use him for 4-6 years, then pay him lots of money as a free agent IF we can afford him after he proves himself. Way to go out on a limb bud. :rolleyes:

The NFL experience is only relevant if you're talking about another FA - otherwise by your logic we shouldn't have drafted Willie (oh, wait, your 4-3 technicality excuse will allow you to get out of this one), Baltimore shouldn't have drafted AD (see above), etc. (I'm sure you'll talk about draft position, but who wouldn't give up a #7 for AD or Willie in his prime) When you can look at film, look at pro days, and talk to a guy who has been around him for 4 years whose opinion you trust, then we could say that he might transition beautifully and/or be a very valuable player if he works out. Again, I reiterate, I'm not saying he's the guy we HAVE to draft, but I'm also not naive and/or arrogant enough to suggest "Chris Long is an overachiever who is not a good fit for the Pats." In my opinion, he has the capability to be a very interesting pick at #7 IF he sticks around that long. Will he be great? I have no idea. Will we draft him even if he is around? Again, I have no idea. The only thing I DO know is that you don't either, but I'm not such a douchebag that I'll state my own egotistical, arrogant, uninformed opinion as absolute fact, you, on the other hand, will.
 
At worst, if he's a bust, Long would be the next Jarvis Green for us, playing DE on third down. I would be shocked.

At best, when he makes the transition, he's a bigger, more powerful Mike Vrabel. Al Groh has explicitly made the comparison between Long and Vrabel. And he's young and he'll be a locker room hero. I think he looks like McGinest, on the field: agile, big, long limbs. We haven't had an elephant in the defense since we lost Willie. He'll make an impact almost immediately.

A #7 pick MUST earn a spot as a team captain within two or three years, in the same way Seymour was. There's no other way to make the cap commitment work. Long has that potential for us, more than anyone else in the entire draft.
 
Speaking as someone who has actually seen some UVA games (not just the 15 sec LB clip from the combine), CLong would have a tough transition to OLB for the Pats. Some observations:

  • CLong has short-area quickness but not straight line pursuit speed.
  • CLong has excellent balance, functional strength and hand technique.
  • CLong excels at penetrating the OL but is an unknown at engaging and moving blockers (wasn't asked to do it).
  • CLong does not have any pass rush moves to speak of.
  • CLong is instinctive moving forward, locating the play without wasted motion or false steps.
  • CLong is much slower moving laterally and does not change direction well.
  • The next time CLong backpedals in a game will be the first time.

Based on his skill set, he seems like a much more natural fit at ILB for the Pats. He would still have a lot of work to do on his lateral movement and cover skills, but that is nothing compared to what he will have to do to remake himself as a Pats OLB.
 
ispatsfan,

If some fans of Chris Long want to hope for the Patriots to draft him then I don't see a need to argue. The FACT is the Patriots don't feel the same way as the Chris Long fans do about him. He's not high on their board as a must have player and they would only consider drafting him where they feel his value is best and that's not at #7. They don't see the comparisons to Vrabel, Bruschi, Colvin and most definitely don't compare him favorably to AD. I could tell more detail of the report on him and it's not just the Patriots but other 3-4 teams as well have basically the same opinion on him. But it's not relevant anyway. He's a great kid and will be a solid but not great NFL Football player. So there's no need to turn this thread into a bash Chris Long thread because he's a good player just not going to be wearing a helmet with the flying Elvis on it.

In the end, Chris Long fans will be in the same boat as DRC fans, cheering for a player not on the Patriots Roster.

PT55
 
Last edited:
If some fans of Chris Long want to hope for the Patriots to draft him then I don't see a need to argue. The FACT is the Patriots don't feel the same way as the Chris Long fans do about him. He's not high on their board as a must have player and they would only consider drafting him where they feel his value is best and that's not at #7. They don't see the comparisons to Vrabel, Bruschi, Colvin and most definitely don't compare him favorably to AD. I could tell more detail of the report on him and it's not just the Patriots but other 3-4 teams as well have basically the same opinion on him. But it's not relevant anyway. He's a great kid and will be a solid but not great NFL Football player. So there's no need to turn this thread into a bash Chris Long thread because he's a good player just not going to be wearing a helmet with the flying Elvis on it.

Perhaps you could enlighten us on who is high on their draft board, since you seem to have access to it. From the sound of things, you are sitting in the scouting offices staring at the board.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


MORSE: Patriots Draft Needs and Draft Related Info
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/19: News and Notes
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf’s Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/18/24
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/18: News and Notes
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/17: News and Notes
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/16: News and Notes
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/15: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-14, Mock Draft 3.0, Gilmore, Law Rally For Bill 
Potential Patriot: Boston Globe’s Price Talks to Georgia WR McConkey
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/12: News and Notes
Back
Top