SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.exactly, lets trade our draft picks to get older players, just what we need, and here i was worrying, thanks for the insightCould it be possible pats will trade their pick to another team for a vet and picks.
Sure BB+P have set up possible scenarios and discussed with other teams prior to draft.
We cannot pull off last years rush every year to costly.
Plus this is a deeper draft fpr LBs and Cbs than 2007
Could it be something that we don't want to hear also? That Spygate has tainted us and players don't want to come here while we are under this cloud and have to deal with the questions and scrutiny that swirls around us?
Could it be something that we don't want to hear also? That Spygate has tainted us and players don't want to come here while we are under this cloud and have to deal with the questions and scrutiny that swirls around us?
Plus this is a deeper draft fpr LBs and Cbs than 2007
We're three days into free agency.
God. I don't care if it's April before we see something. The Pats do what they do on the timeline that best suits their interests (not the timeline that best suits this bulletin board.)
My guess is that they want very much to retain Moss. My guess is that Moss is at least to some extent sincere about enjoying what he has in NE. I don't think we lose him.
It is possible, however, that Moss is not sincere, or that the dollar signs suddenly started blinking after the season's end, over a few mohitos with his agent... I read him as much more intelligent than that, myself, just from the few times I've heard him speak.
There is no "do it now!" clause in my fan-contract... there is only a "laundry" clause. I.e., if you're in another uni come autumn, thanks for the memories. (Not that these guys care.)
I don't think we have to worry about that with Randy, though I have been wrong in the past.
Final note, regarding "reasons" the Pats "have not been active..."
Because a handful of teams stood outside the store waiting for the i-phone to go on-sale doesn't mean you can't buy one a couple months later... and oh yeah by the way? A couple hundred bucks cheaper.
PFnV
Could it be something that we don't want to hear also? That Spygate has tainted us and players don't want to come here while we are under this cloud and have to deal with the questions and scrutiny that swirls around us?
The Raiders have been active and they signed away a S from the world champ Giants. Enough said. Are you kidding me w/this remark?!
Maybe trying to deal with the first priority -- Moss -- first.
The fact that they have not reeled Moss in doesnt mean they aren't trying hard to do that.
Could it be possible pats will trade their pick to another team for a vet and picks.
Sure BB+P have set up possible scenarios and discussed with other teams prior to draft.
We cannot pull off last years rush every year to costly.
Plus this is a deeper draft fpr LBs and Cbs than 2007
This is the age of e-mails and faxes. It should be possible to keep
negotiations going on several players at the same time.
I can't believe the Pats haven't re-signed Jabar Gaffney simply
because they are negotiating with Moss first.
With Gay making the round of other teams, Gaffney and Moss remain
the only Patriot players worth re-signing. Mitchell, Seau, and Scott
have injury concerns.