- Joined
- Aug 27, 2005
- Messages
- 1,204
- Reaction score
- 11
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Great move by Scot Pioli who is not hated by the mediots like BB is. His revelations that Walsh taped his conversations eith him is helping this scandal to turn back towards its creator, the scumbag Walsh.
Isn't taping a conversation without their knowledge a violation of the Federal Wiretapping Laws which would be considered a felony?
Isn't taping a conversation without their knowledge a violation of the Federal Wiretapping Laws which would be considered a felony?
My understanding is that it varies by state. In California (where I live) both parties must consent to a call being recorded. Mass is also a two party consent state. Wikipedia has a stub on telephone recording laws if you are interested.
Great move by Scot Pioli who is not hated by the mediots like BB is. His revelations that Walsh taped his conversations eith him is helping this scandal to turn back towards its creator, the scumbag Walsh.
Isn't taping a conversation without their knowledge a violation of the Federal Wiretapping Laws which would be considered a felony?
One thing this raises is that maybe the "tapes" Walsh lawyers claims he has are in fact just these audio tapes he made.
doesn't sound like they weren't phone conversations.
that could be worse actually, if they are making any references to illegal taping.
wtf is with you?
It doesn't matter - in two party consent states all parties must consent to taping of any conversation - whether it be by telephone or in person.doesn't sound like they weren't phone conversations.
that could be worse actually, if they are making any references to illegal taping.