SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.It'll be interesting to see, because thats the strategy they employed against Holmes, who's Pitssbughs deep threat. Its possible that Mathis is pedigree and his sucess against Holmes will embolden them into trying that strategy, at least initially.
It'll be interesting to see, because thats the strategy they employed against Holmes, who's Pitssbughs deep threat. Its possible that Mathis is pedigree and his sucess against Holmes will embolden them into trying that strategy, at least initially.
IMO, There isn't a CB in the league that could cover Randy Moss one-on-one all night without getting burned several times. I doubt Jax is that dumb, but then again, one never knows.
i was going to disagree and then i remembered..Champ Bailey covered Moss 1on1 last year in Oakland when i saw a game and Moss got past him 3-4 times that game where you saw the ball get thrown. He had a drop, an overthrow twice. Bailey had his hands full when Bailey was the best last year.
Lets see - You are comparing the defending of a 2nd year average WR in Holmes to a bonafide HOF WR in Randy Moss? - BTW Ward is more of a deep threat then Holmes in the games I've seen
This is a joke right?
Exactly! I saw that game too. If you take Moss' size, speed, hands, and athletic ability, there isn't a CB that can cover him one-on-one, but obviously teams have had success neutralizing Moss, it just hasn't been from man to man coverage.
What type of coverage was Philly using when Lito Sheppard was roughing up Moss from the LOS in that game?
Lets see - You are comparing the defending of a 2nd year average WR in Holmes to a bonafide HOF WR in Randy Moss? - BTW Ward is more of a deep threat then Holmes in the games I've seen
This is a joke right?
Obviously Moss is a much better player than Holmes..the reason why I bring this up is because Holmes is a poor mans Moss, so they me be strategized against similarly. And Holmes is a better deep threat than Ward.
Holmes is a homeless guy passed out in the gutter's Moss.
Holmes is actually a very good receiver. I'm not sure why people feel the need to dengrate him while pointing out that Moss is better. There aren't many receivers that Moss isn't better than.
It'll be interesting to see, because thats the strategy they employed against Holmes, who's Pitssbughs deep threat. Its possible that Mathis is pedigree and his sucess against Holmes will embolden them into trying that strategy, at least initially.