NEGoldenAge
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2007
- Messages
- 2,022
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Would it have been bad if the Bills threw a TD pass to where Taylor should have been?
I bet Tom and Randy would have picked up on it only to be called classless. I'm just wondering how the rest of you feel.
Would it have been bad if the Bills threw a TD pass to where Taylor should have been?
I bet Tom and Randy would have picked up on it only to be called classless. I'm just wondering how the rest of you feel.
Umm, yes, it would have been utterly and completely classless. And I think Belichick is man enough that he would have ran a running play to the left, too.
I disagree. I mean, I understand what the Redskins were saying with that action. I agree with it. However, I don't think that the 'skins voluntary action should necessarily require a voluntary action on the opponent's part. What would have happened if they chose to play the whole game with 10 defenders? Should no plays have been run to where Taylors assignments would have been?
Always somebody has to be a wisea$$.Would it have been bad if the Bills threw a TD pass to where Taylor should have been?
I bet Tom and Randy would have picked up on it only to be called classless. I'm just wondering how the rest of you feel.
Always somebody has to be a wisea$$.
My intent was not to be a wise-*****. I just had the thought and wondered what others thought.
It would of been horrible and DEFINITELY classless. The guy is killed so they decided to run a 10 man defense. Exploiting that is like spitting on him.
Bills didn't know that was what the Skins were going to do and are a team that almost always run on first down. The Pats on the other hand throw on first down.
I disagree. I mean, I understand what the Redskins were saying with that action. I agree with it. However, I don't think that the 'skins voluntary action should necessarily require a voluntary action on the opponent's part. What would have happened if they chose to play the whole game with 10 defenders? Should no plays have been run to where Taylors assignments would have been?
Umm, yes, it would have been utterly and completely classless. And I think Belichick is man enough that he would have ran a running play to the left, too.
I don't know for sure what the Pats would have done in that situation, but I think that BB would not have gone for it on the first play. If the Redskins had continued to play 10, though, I suspect Belichick would have no qualms about attacking the hole.
If that's the case, Michael Pittman would have taken the rock to the house.It would of been horrible and DEFINITELY classless. The guy is killed so they decided to run a 10 man defense. Exploiting that is like spitting on him.