SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.It looked close to me, what I want to know is where was this "technology" a few Sundays ago?? This kick, IMO, was a bit closer, but AV's wasn't that far off either.
What did you guys think of Gaffney's catch?? Looked like his shin (not knee) was down in bounds. Regardless, I was surprised they did not review that play. Must be some conspiracy or something.
What did you guys think of Gaffney's catch?? Looked like his shin (not knee) was down in bounds. Regardless, I was surprised they did not review that play. Must be some conspiracy or something.
It looked close to me, what I want to know is where was this "technology" a few Sundays ago?? This kick, IMO, was a bit closer, but AV's wasn't that far off either.
What did you guys think of Gaffney's catch?? Looked like his shin (not knee) was down in bounds. Regardless, I was surprised they did not review that play. Must be some conspiracy or something.
It looked close to me, what I want to know is where was this "technology" a few Sundays ago?? This kick, IMO, was a bit closer, but AV's wasn't that far off either.
What did you guys think of Gaffney's catch?? Looked like his shin (not knee) was down in bounds. Regardless, I was surprised they did not review that play. Must be some conspiracy or something.
Neither me nor my wife could figure out why Madden kept on about that catch. It was clear as day to me, Gaffney got both toes in, had posession and never came close to losing posession through the catch. It didn't need to be reviewed but if it had been there is no way it would be overturned unless I completely missed something.
It looked close to me, what I want to know is where was this "technology" a few Sundays ago?? This kick, IMO, was a bit closer, but AV's wasn't that far off either.
What did you guys think of Gaffney's catch?? Looked like his shin (not knee) was down in bounds. Regardless, I was surprised they did not review that play. Must be some conspiracy or something.
He did. His toe dragged a big puff of dirt/dust into the air.As near as I can tell on that play, after he caught the pass, one of his feet clearly came down (flat) in-bounds. I could have sworn he dragged his other foot through the dirt in-bounds as well.
OTOH, I wholeheartedly agree with this. I saw an ad for TROOL-BE-GONE on TV the other night. You had to order by midnight, but if I see the ad again, I will buy Ian some for XMAS.Who gives a rat's ass about Vinatieri and what he does? Gaffney's catch was unquestionably a touchdown. Watch the replay next time. You're really irritating, I don't care how many posts you've racked up here, you're a troll. Be gone.
Yeah, Andy Reid is in on the conspiracy.
I think maybe Reid couldn't throw the flag in that circumstance because it was under 2 minutes.
I didn't understand what Madden and Michaels were blathering about. Two feet equals TD.
On a field goal over the post, I thought the entire ball needed to pass inside where the post would extend.
It looked close to me, what I want to know is where was this "technology" a few Sundays ago?? This kick, IMO, was a bit closer, but AV's wasn't that far off either.
What did you guys think of Gaffney's catch?? Looked like his shin (not knee) was down in bounds. Regardless, I was surprised they did not review that play. Must be some conspiracy or something.
What did you guys think of Gaffney's catch?? Looked like his shin (not knee) was down in bounds. Regardless, I was surprised they did not review that play. Must be some conspiracy or something.