SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Nobody mentions Freeney's injury. Sadly, when a Colt is down, media exaggerates. They forgot we were without Seymour for 7 weeks.
Nobody mentions Freeney's injury. Sadly, when a Colt is down, media exaggerates. They forgot we were without Seymour for 7 weeks.
Because his injury didn't cause Manning to throw an assload of INTs. The media is only interested in talking about missing Colts players if they can use them as an excuse for Peyton's crappy game.Then why nobody is talking about Freeney?
Get serious. Freeney is a high profile pass rusher, and Sey plays a less than glorious role. Secondly, Sey didn't go down in a nationally televised game.
You are making an unfair comparison to justify and unfair belief.
Because his injury didn't cause Manning to throw an assload of INTs.
Get serious. Freeney is a high profile pass rusher, and Sey plays a less than glorious role. Secondly, Sey didn't go down in a nationally televised game.
You are making an unfair comparison to justify and unfair belief.
Not to mention that the Colts losing Freeney is much more serious than the Pats losing Seymour for the following reasons:
1) The Pats have greater talent and depth on the defensive line than the Colts
2) New England is accustomed to playing without Seymour to his injury history
3) Freeney is a player of greater impact than Seymour
(and don't anyone even start arguing that you'd take Seymour over Freeney, because if you do, you're just whacked. WHACKED!)
Not to mention that the Colts losing Freeney is much more serious than the Pats losing Seymour for the following reasons:
1) The Pats have greater talent and depth on the defensive line than the Colts
2) New England is accustomed to playing without Seymour due to his chronic injury history
3) Freeney is a player of greater impact than Seymour
(and don't anyone even start arguing that you'd take Seymour over Freeney, because if you do, you're just whacked. WHACKED!)
Please.... I'd take Seymour over Freeney every single time. It's not even close.
Please.... I'd take Seymour over Freeney every single time. It's not even close.
Please.... I'd take Seymour over Freeney every single time. It's not even close.
Can you even IMAGINE Freeney on this team? With Adalius Thomas and Vrabel and Warren and Wilfork?
Not to mention that the Colts losing Freeney is much more serious than the Pats losing Seymour for the following reasons:
1) The Pats have greater talent and depth on the defensive line than the Colts
2) New England is accustomed to playing without Seymour due to his chronic injury history
3) Freeney is a player of greater impact than Seymour
(and don't anyone even start arguing that you'd take Seymour over Freeney, because if you do, you're just whacked. WHACKED!)
Can you even IMAGINE Freeney on this team? With Adalius Thomas and Vrabel and Warren and Wilfork?
Oh, my God, you're talking late '70's Steelers, the greatest D-Line ever assembled!
No! You DID NOT just say that!
You're laughing right now, right?
"Got old Armen on that one! LOL!", right?
You're not really suggesting you'd take a guy who plays 7-9 games a season and has a backup who is arguably more effective than he is over the highest-impact-RPM-motor-running D-Lineman in the NFL, are you? ARE YOU?
Can you even IMAGINE Freeney on this team? With Adalius Thomas and Vrabel and Warren and Wilfork?
Oh, my God, you're talking late '70's Steelers, the greatest D-Line ever assembled!
Wow! The Kool-Aid has permeated deep!
I am certain - I KNOW - Belichick disagrees with you. So does Pioli.
If they could trade Seymour for Freeney tomorrow, straight up, it's done!