SHALISE MANZA YOUNG's great article!!

[NYCPatsFan]

At last!! We have a clear and strong article that addresses the bad rap that the Pats have been getting all along. Very nice nuggets of information of the charitable acts of the other players such as Green.

Awesome Shalise!! Please keep up the good work.


http://www.projo.com/patriots/content/sp_bb_pats31_10-31-07_487MBDA_v16.31573c9.html

 

[shmessy]

Shalise Manza Young is putting on a clinic this year.

...........which means it's only a matter of time before we lose her to MSNBC, ESPN or Around the Horn (also on ESPN).

 

[nummit]

Great read, thanks

 

[letekro]

What a stupid article. Oh, really, the Patriots don't eat their babies, they AREN"T evil???

By writing fact-based articles like this, she is just perpetuating the good v. evil storyline by implying that there is some factual basis to it, which she is now trying to refute. Instead of letting the ravings of a lone madman fade away into the ether, she has chosen to address them. Why does she deserve praise for this?

 

[NYCPatsFan]

What a stupid article. Oh, really, the Patriots don't eat their babies, they AREN"T evil???

By writing fact-based articles like this, she is just perpetuating the good v. evil storyline by implying that there is some factual basis to it, which she is now trying to refute. Instead of letting the ravings of a lone madman fade away into the ether, she has chosen to address them. Why does she deserve praise for this?

Like the humor in your first couple of lines but not sure if you are continuing to be sarcastic in your last question. If you are, good one.

If not: I didn't view this article as a response to a mudslinging mad man. I admire it because it is one of the rare ones in the local area that clearly lays out the hypocrisy and the slander that the Pats have been subjected to on so many fronts.

So yeah, she deserves my full praise!

 

[shmessy]

What a stupid article. Oh, really, the Patriots don't eat their babies, they AREN"T evil???

By writing fact-based articles like this, she is just perpetuating the good v. evil storyline by implying that there is some factual basis to it, which she is now trying to refute. Instead of letting the ravings of a lone madman fade away into the ether, she has chosen to address them. Why does she deserve praise for this?

A "lone" madman?

How long have you been gone, Letekro?

 

[letekro]

A "lone" madman?

How long have you been gone, Letekro?

Easterbrook, and Easterbrook alone, came up with the good v. evil thing. Writing about the good works of Jarvis Green seems like an overly serious response, and gives credence to Easterbrook's ravings.