- Joined
- Jun 12, 2006
- Messages
- 5,391
- Reaction score
- 606
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Reiss' blog, you know the link.linky goodness, please?
I am guessing Jackson won't be activated until after week 9. That is a bye week. So that gives him four weeks of practice before he is actually able to play a game. Considering he has never had a training camp and he needs to probably get acclimated to the offense, the Pats probably would like him to practice as much as possible before he starts playing.
Interesting to hear. Would love to have Chad Jackson on the 53, if at all possible, 'though I don't wish injury on anyone. I still think he'll wind up on IR as a "healthy-ish stash," but we'll just have to see.
I still think that Jackson very likely takes Washington's spot.
Or possibly Gafney's, but Washington seems to have similar responsibilities to what Jackson would have.
Reiss' blog, you know the link.
Two reasons why i think this unlikely.
1. WRs are expected to "break out" (if they are ever to do so) in their 3rd year.
But CJ would have missed almost all of his first two.
His rookie contract would run out before his scheduled "breakout".
2. Knowing #1, his agent has already huffed and puffed about a union action
should there be a bogus IR.
Jesus, of all the potential bookmarks you could have you don't have this one :That's helpful. How the Hell are the lazy like myself supposed to deal with THAT?
Two reasons why i think this unlikely.
1. WRs are expected to "break out" (if they are ever to do so) in their 3rd year.
But CJ would have missed almost all of his first two.
His rookie contract would run out before his scheduled "breakout".
2. Knowing #1, his agent has already huffed and puffed about a union action
should there be a bogus IR.
i seriously doubt brady will have as much trust with jackson as with gaffeney.