- Joined
- Dec 6, 2004
- Messages
- 1,600
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.i find it hilarious that we had all of these late round draft picks that we had little use for, and pretty much knew wouldnt make the team, and we still picked guys good enough that as soon as they were available the Jets jumped all over them.
We didnt have need to draft for, and were picking guys will almost no chance to make the team, and we did a better job of finding guys who fit the Jets needs than the Jets did.
I see this a little differently than many here do. What the Jets essentially did was to trade all of their second day picks to move up and get guys that they had no chance of getting otherwise, and then backfill those "picks" after the fact with players who had already been coached up to fit their system.
So they got to have their cake and eat it to. How is that a bad thing again?
As I said in another thread, the Jets have moved up pretty high on my loathe list too. I hope that they go 0-16 for the next 7 years too. But there is no reason to manufacture reasons to attack them. Their games are material enough.
I see this a little differently than many here do. What the Jets essentially did was to trade all of their second day picks to move up and get guys that they had no chance of getting otherwise, and then backfill those "picks" after the fact with players who had already been coached up to fit their system.
So they got to have their cake and eat it to. How is that a bad thing again?
As I said in another thread, the Jets have moved up pretty high on my loathe list too. I hope that they go 0-16 for the next 7 years too. But there is no reason to manufacture reasons to attack them. Their games are material enough.
The only problem with this theory is that if the players were any good, even to fill our back spots, they'd still be on our team. The cake they're eating is stale. They can have it.
So, the the jets trading up and are signing patriot castoffs to backfill for late Round Two draft picks. This sound right to me.
Dear God -- I know you are very busy and there are alot more important things than football but if you have any spare time on Sunday can you help the Dolphins crush the Jets? I know it's probably blasphemy to pray for the total annihilation of a sports team but it would right a karmic wrong and make many people in New England and Miami very, very happy.
Thanks for listening.
Can someone please explain to me how filming an opposing sideline in public, in front of 78,000 people is so much worse than bringing in and interrogating a former employee of another team regarding the plays he learned in private from an opposing team's coaching staff?
I see this a little differently than many here do. What the Jets essentially did was to trade all of their second day picks to move up and get guys that they had no chance of getting otherwise, and then backfill those "picks" after the fact with players who had already been coached up to fit their system.
So they got to have their cake and eat it to. How is that a bad thing again?
As I said in another thread, the Jets have moved up pretty high on my loathe list too. I hope that they go 0-16 for the next 7 years too. But there is no reason to manufacture reasons to attack them. Their games are material enough.
No, they are using guys that were drafted on the second day to backfill picks lost on the second day. Plus they get the benefit of knowing the players were well coached.
Again, there is nothing wrong with what the Jets are doing. Their OL sucks and they are picking at the scraps to see if they can find a nugget. How is that any different than NE grabbing safeties like they were going out of style in 2005?
There are plenty of reasons to poke fun at with the Jets. I just don't see why this is one of them.
For me personally, the thing I found creepy was that I predicted the Jets first 2 draft picks and predicted the tradeups needed to get them. The creepy part is that I was predicting what the Pats were going to do in the draft.
Yes. One violates an expressly written rule and memo from the comissioner.
The other does not.