PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

9/19 Daily scandal press -- Post 'em all here!


Status
Not open for further replies.

patchick

Moderatrix
Staff member
PatsFans.com Supporter
Joined
Sep 13, 2004
Messages
15,208
Reaction score
12,977
The board has gotten choked by separate threads on every single columnist and talking head weighing in with his or her opinion. Please support our ability to talk football by posting all of these items here. (Actual breaking news is another story, of course.) Thank you!
 
Has to be stickied or this will disappear. :confused:
 
maybe use the training camp room for spygate stuff?
 
Would be allot easier if they stay in thier own thread.
 
Thank you.
 
Arrest them all!

A Statement by Kimmons Security Services, Inc.: New England Patriots Cheating May Warrant Criminal Investigation




HOUSTON, Sept. 18 /PRNewswire/ -- The NFL may not have the final word on punishment for the New England Patriots and team coaches. News accounts of the cheating scandal report covert video surveillance and taping of opposing teams defensive signals. Covert video surveillance is not a criminal offense, in most cases. However, some news accounts mention, "Patriots might have wired linemen to pick up opposing teams' offensive audibles." If this is true, and conversations were covertly intercepted without participants' knowledge, this could very well be a criminal offense. In most states, at least one party in a conversation must know it is being intercepted or taped, or a criminal law has been violated. Some states require all party consent for audio monitoring.

Any suspicion of covert interception of conversations should be fully investigated by law enforcement. We would probably be naive to think the Patriots are the only team involved in cheating. How widespread is this problem, and have teams crossed the line and laws been violated? Corporations have been aware of the threat of eavesdropping over airways and telephone communications for years. Many have taken appropriate steps through security measures to limit such threats. It would be prudent for the NFL, and possibly others, to fully investigate these incidents, and determine if teams may have been involved in such practices.

The law seems to be very clear regarding the covert interception of conversations. The question that remains would seem to be whether or not the Patriots, and possibly others, have been involved in this potential illegal activity. This question needs to be answered.
http://www.kxxv.com/global/story.asp?s=7090518
 
Last edited:
"Statement by Kimmons Security Services" -- ok, that's a paid blurb on PR Newswire! It's just a security company trying to use a news story as an advertising opportunity.
 
Re: Arrest them all!


That is some REALLY funny S_h_i_t !!!

Was the writer of that hilarious article aware that the persons in question in the SECRET wiretapping incident were playing football in public with 60K plus fans around them?

I'm pretty sure they gave up their right to privacy. That article was really far fetched.
 
This sucks! Now I have to sift thru every post in this thread plus scroll over the titles in the main forum to find stuff. It sucks I tell you!
 
It does seem as if every obscure media wanna be is putting out pure speculation pieces with dramatic headlines just to get themselves noticed.

I agree that it has gone over the top and that we should post them on one thread unless they are really factual and from a credible source.
 
I'm a little confused here. Is this thread only for posting of articles or discussion as well?

It seems to me that a lot of articles are going to be missed if we discuss them in this very same thread. Maybe one article thread and one discussion thread?
 
"Statement by Kimmons Security Services" -- ok, that's a paid blurb on PR Newswire! It's just a security company trying to use a news story as an advertising opportunity.

Yeah, that is pretty funny. FYI as a matter of law, in New York state, you have the right to tape your conversations without any consent. Assuming the Patriots defenders were also making noise, there's no violation of law.
 
It does seem as if every obscure media wanna be is putting out pure speculation pieces with dramatic headlines just to get themselves noticed.

I agree that it has gone over the top and that we should post them on one thread unless they are really factual and from a credible source.

NUT, wouldn't it be easier to place the 'other threads' into thier own sticky?
You need to send your leak picture over to PFT for the "pic of the day"
 
I attempted creating this sticky last week but it got buried in the avalanche of other threads. Hope this is useful...


Note - I didn't bother to include every journalist/story who is trying to slander us. But players - yes, I tried to include all because they should be knowing better.

----
Sticky? BULLETIN MATERIAL FOR THE WHOLE YEAR

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hopefully the players have this taped and read it every day: (Please add all you can!)

(1) "This episode represents a calculated and deliberate attempt to avoid longstanding rules designed to encourage fair play and promote honest competition on the playing field," Goodell

(2) Boston Globe: 9/13/07
http://www.boston.com/sports/footbal...s_to_patriots/

With spying accusations leveled this week against the Patriots, some of the Eagles left from the NFC title team are wondering if New England used bootleg film to their advantage in the Super Bowl. "Do I think about it? Mmm hmmm," said Brown, their starting cornerback. "It's crazy. I just don't know how far back it goes. Something's not right about that." Pro Bowl safety Brian Dawkins found the accusations troublesome. "Now there's always going to be questions about the situation," Dawkins said Thursday. "Was it great adjustments at halftime or what?" "I was like, 'Man, I never saw that many screens," Brown said. Brown wonders if it was normal playcalling from a team good enough to win three Super Bowls in four seasons, a Patriots team that used a strong scouting report to gain a fair edge, or was somebody picking up the Eagles defensive calls from a sideline camera that deprived them of a fair shot?

(3) Boston Globe, 9/13/07
http://www.boston.com/sports/footbal...f_disapproval/

In Pittsburgh, Steelers receiver Hines Ward reflected on the AFC Championship game from the 2001 season, a 24-17 Patriots victory. Ward said he felt the Patriots had some unusual help in that game. "Oh, they knew. They were calling our stuff out," he said. "They knew a lot of our calls. You would hope that during their run, when they were winning all their [three] Super Bowls, all that stuff wasn't going on. It seemed like they were a step ahead of us at all times, but those games are behind us. There's nothing we can do about it. You just look forward and see what the commissioner will do."

(4) Boston Globe, 9/13/07
http://www.boston.com/sports/footbal...f_disapproval/

Giants defensive end Michael Strahan, speaking on a conference call with Wisconsin reporters, had questions regarding the Patriots. "It just makes you wonder how long they've been doing this and did it really help them win some games," he said. "And if they've been doing it in those games that they've won Super Bowls in or playoff [games]. That team has won some big games."

(5) Boston Globe, 9/13/07
http://www.boston.com/sports/footbal...f_disapproval/

Jacksonville defensive end Paul Spicer wasn't surprised at the investigation of the Patriots' alleged tactics. "This ain't news," he said. "I've heard it in the past. They finally got caught. The Patriots got caught. They're busted." Spicer added that commissioner Roger Goodell has "been hard on players; now let's see how hard he's going to be with a team." "They're the ones that have to pay the consequences for it," Spicer said. "If that's the way they feel like they have to get the upper hand, then so be it. Everybody's been running around calling them geniuses for years. What are they going to say now?"

(6) ESPN, 9/13/07
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/column...fri&id=3017423

Turner told the players that their playbooks would be locked up during their Saturday afternoon walk-through at Gillette Stadium. That was a guarantee. Normally, Turner might not be so overly paranoid about entering another team's stadium. But ever since news spread that the Patriots were videotaping the defensive signals of the New York Jets during New England's 38-14 win last Sunday, extra precautions were being made. "Norv wanted us to know that he was going to be careful," one Chargers player said. "We'd already heard a lot of things about the Patriots in the past. But what happened this week has made everybody a lot more cautious. He was even talking about keeping Patriots employees from entering our hotel."


(7) ESPN, 9/13/07
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/column...fri&id=3017423

Added an NFC general manager: "The accusation far outweighs what is actually happening. This isn't rampant throughout the league. Now, the arrogance of thinking you could get away with it? That is the beauty of this. … It's the height of arrogance." An AFC executive suggested that Belichick "probably got greedy and let whatever issues he has with [Jets coach Eric] Mangini get the best of him."

(8) ESPN, 9/11/07
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3017342

"It's a league issue, and they are handling it." -- Eric Mangini, New York Jets head coach

"Hopefully there's a harsh enough penalty that it's not worth it to try to cheat and try to get any advantage that you're not allowed to get. I hope the commissioner is just as harsh on them as he's been on individual players for making mistakes." -- Carson Palmer, Cincinnati Bengals quarterback


"When you look back, it's scary. I think highly of their coaching staff and their personnel, but if that's the case, that's not right. I would consider it cheating." -- Al Harris, Green Bay Packers cornerback

"I think the Patriots actually live by the saying, 'If you're not cheating, you're not trying.' They live off that statement. Nothing surprises me really....You keep hearing the different stories about stuff that they do."
-- LaDainian Tomlinson, San Diego Chargers running back
 
I guess this would be the place for this latest bit of libel from ESPN's Chris Mortenson in a "chat" going on presently --

Ed, NY: Could the Patriots go 16-0? I am just asking because they don't seem weak in any area and Bill Belichick may go out of his way to show that a camera means nothing to him. Imagine what that would do to the nay sayers.

Chris Mortensen: (11:23 AM ET ) It wouldn't surprise me. They have great players. They have a great coach. They have a mission...and that was before this incident. But you do understand that the "cheating" has been more extensive than the just videotaping opposing teams hand signals, right? And many players and assistant coaches have little idea about the operation but when you take into fact that the Patriots are the best-prepared team in football with a great coach, quarterback and players...and owner...only the Colts have a shot to beat them.

I'm not even sure exactly what he's trying to say here, but I am pretty sure that he shouldn't be stating it as fact without providing some sort of sourcing on it.
 
"Statement by Kimmons Security Services" -- ok, that's a paid blurb on PR Newswire! It's just a security company trying to use a news story as an advertising opportunity.

Is that what that is? A pay-as-you-release news service? That's fabulous!!

So, if I felt like it, I could send out a press release from Sundayjack Interglobal Multiservice Manufacturing Corp. on any issue that compels me? What a grand concept!

Actually, what would be great here is if poor Bob Kimmons, who invited people to "contact" him, actually got his wish. I'm a big supporter of Bob's, but I would like to talk to him about leaving legal malpractice to lawyers, and focusing his concentration on teaching parents how to invade their children's Myspace accounts.
 
I guess this would be the place for this latest bit of libel from ESPN's Chris Mortenson in a "chat" going on presently --


I'm not even sure exactly what he's trying to say here, but I am pretty sure that he shouldn't be stating it as fact without providing some sort of sourcing on it.
My two responses are :

1) How does Mortensen know if many Asst. Coaches and Players don't ?

2) Until/unless an equal investigation into other teams is done I really don't care :

Scenario 1 - Patriots are proven to be dirty, other teams are investigated fully and are completely clean.

Scenario 2 - Patriots are proven to be dirty, other teams are investigated fully and are proven to be dirty.

Scenario 3 - Patriots are proven to be dirty, other teams aren't investigated.

Scenario 1 is a problem. Scenarios 2 & 3 aren't (for me).
 
Last edited:
Found this in Tom Curran's current article:

The first is that the NFL made copies of the offending tape for the competition committee members and that's how one landed in the hands of Fox. A league source said Tuesday that the NFL guaranteed New England only one copy would be made of the tape and that that copy was going to the league office. But after that promise, the Jets were allowed to copy the tape and that's how it got out.

http://www.nbcsports.com/portal/sit...0VgnVCM2000006fc3d240RCRD&cpsextcurrchannel=1
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/17: News and Notes
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/16: News and Notes
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/15: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-14, Mock Draft 3.0, Gilmore, Law Rally For Bill 
Potential Patriot: Boston Globe’s Price Talks to Georgia WR McConkey
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/12: News and Notes
Not a First Round Pick? Hoge Doubles Down on Maye
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/11: News and Notes
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft #5 and Thoughts About Dugger Signing
Matthew Slater Set For New Role With Patriots
Back
Top