- Joined
- Aug 27, 2005
- Messages
- 1,204
- Reaction score
- 11
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I mean, turnabouts fair play, right? Thanks to CBS, we have screen shots of "Al" The Loyal Jets employee filming away ONLY when THe Pats D was on the field.
Rest not, fellow Pats fans - we will continue to push this!!!!
Get it straight, ok asstool, Ill get it straight.
Mangini, Dec 16th we are looking forward to you!
Get it straight, ok asstool, Ill get it straight.
Mangini, Dec 16th we are looking forward to you!
Had to move this up again (and before we got off topic) since it sums up three current threads pretty nicely. There's a clearly a lot of proof on this site from multiple independant users that there was a Jets employee with a video camera on the sidelines last weekend. Indisputable proof. Now if we are correct that the current NFL rule, which the Patriots were just punished for breaking, is that teams are not allowed to have video cameras on the field then it seems pretty clear cut that the J E T S Jets Jets Jets are in violation. Not to mention even more evidence of them only shooting the field while the Pats were on defense. We as Patriot fans owe it to this team to not let this be swept under the rug by the media because they only want to crucify BB and the Pats as the Evil Overlords of the NFL.
If I'm wrong in my above assumptions, if I am misinterpreting the rules in any way, someone please tell me. Because we could be sitting on something big right here.
If he is a Jets employee as I was told by the media (see the sticky thread incorrectly stating this was debunked)
If our understanding of the rules is correct that a team employee can not record from the field, only three locations
This is a slam dunk and the Jets should get the exact same punishment. I will not rest until this is finished. Either proof he is not a Jest employee or if he is, the rules showing how he can be there or the same punishment. 3 options. We can make a differance
the guy in the green is the same guy in the (proven wrong) pic on touchdown.org . What is the complaint, that he is on the field videotaping? How do you know he works for the jets?
and if mangini was going to get belichick in trouble that game it would be pretty dumb to be breaking the same rule. we shall see.
I just emailed Reiss again, sent to his mailbag. It might take a while for him to read it but I figure he's gotta to at least take a look at some point. We need to continue to bombard Florio. I fear that he's been so anti Patriot the last week, and with people here saying to never link to him again, he might be ready willing and able to ignore this completely. Have Patriots Planet or NEM's site caught onto this? Perhaps those who have accounts there, or don't mind creating new ones, can link to this thread. We have to unite Patriots nation!
I am off to google to see if I can't find the exact rule.
Alright so I think this is the key thing:
By NFL rule every videographer and still photogapher has to be in either a red or black vest. This guy should be in a black vest. Even if he's with Jets Total Access or "Kickin' it wit' Mangenius". I'm still not 100% sure it's a Jets polo he has one. But either he's a Jets employee or a videographer who somehow got out of wearing the league mandated black vest.
So the question remains... WHO IS HE!?!?!?!?!?!
Like I said in the other thread he responded to me saying he didnt think there was much to this. I respect his opinion so I am moving on.
I was told by a TV station in town he was a Jets employee. Im not ready to lay down yet.
If he is a Jets employee as I was told by the media (see the sticky thread incorrectly stating this was debunked)
If our understanding of the rules is correct that a team employee can not record from the field, only three locations
This is a slam dunk and the Jets should get the exact same punishment. I will not rest until this is finished. Either proof he is not a Jest employee or if he is, the rules showing how he can be there or the same punishment. 3 options. We can make a differance