The problem that I have with Mr. Wright's analysis of the Pats draft is that he puts HIS bias of the players on to how the Pats evaluated the players. What Mr. Wright clearly doesn't understand is that the Patriots use their own scouts for evaluations. Scouts who have produced the likes of Stephen Neal, Dan Koppen, Logan Mankins, Nick Kaczur and Ryan O'Callaghan for the O-line. So, his questioning of Oldenburg and Elgin leaves something to be desired. Especially since Elgin wowed the team at mini-camp with his technique and power.
Mr. Wright's evaluation of Lua and Rogers is somewhat lacking. He downplays how good Ray Maualuga is and the fact that Maualuga projects as a mid 1st round pick next year. I don't believe its a bad thing to lose your starting position due to injury to a player as good as Maualuga projects. Also, many people were amazed at how well Lua played when he was in the line-up. He didn't make them forget Lofa Tatupu, but he also didn't make them want for his return either.
As for Rogers, yes, he was a 4-3 DE in college. However, he did spend time without his hand in the dirt and actually PREFERRED to not line up in a 3 point stance. I think its shallow of Wright to question Rogers talent without mentioning that Rogers is the perfect size for a Pats LB at 6'2 and 252 lbs. What is interesting is that Rogers is mentioned as being game quick, more than testing quick.
Like others have mentioned, Mr. Wright seems to ive no credit for the Pats acquiring Wes Welker OR Randy Moss. And those two players boost this draft tremendously.
And, like others have mentioned, there just aren't that many positions available on this team. And very few people expect to find starters beyond the 4th round. Most teams project those players as back-ups and are pleasantly surprised when they get starters, ala Brady, Thomas, Terrell Davis, etc.
