PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Kirwin's 3-4 Draft Perspective [merged]


Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Kirwin's 3-4 Draft Perspective

Not so subtle reminder to keep Anthony Waters in mind, we have LB for this year (although we could use a little depth) but could afford a second day pick to wait on a guy with big time upside.
 
Re: Kirwin's 3-4 Draft Perspective

Not so subtle reminder to keep Anthony Waters in mind, we have LB for this year (although we could use a little depth) but could afford a second day pick to wait on a guy with big time upside.

I know DaBruinz has been high on Waters for months. Bradley should definitely be on that list, and IMO DeOssie seems like a project pick who is being overrated due to name recognition. I haven't seen DeOssie play a down, but I have heard from multiple sources, including his own father, that Zak is not a physical player, relying more on keen intellect than brute force to position himself correctly. That's all fine, but an almost psychotic love of violence seems like a prerequisite for ILB in the NFL. Tim Shaw's experience at both ILB and DE seems to make him an ideal ILB prospect, not OLB as Kirwan writes. I'm beating a dead horse that many people have shot more than once, but I like Siler for ILB.
 
Last edited:
Re: Kirwin's 3-4 Draft Perspective

Interesting that all three ILB selections are perceived as run stuffers who struggle against the pass. A good read nontheless.
 
Re: Kirwin's 3-4 Draft Perspective

I know DaBruinz has been high on Waters for months. Bradley should definitely be on that list, and IMO DeOssie seems like a project pick who is being overrated due to name recognition. I haven't seen DeOssie play a down, but I have heard from multiple sources, including his own father, that Zak is not a physical player, relying more on keen intellect than brute force to position himself correctly. That's all fine, but an almost psychotic love of violence seems like a prerequisite for ILB in the NFL. Tim Shaw's experience at both ILB and DE seems to make him an ideal ILB prospect, not OLB as Kirwan writes. I'm beating a dead horse that many people have shot more than once, but I like Siler for ILB.
That's okay, if they are shooting the dead horse it keeps you out of the line of fire.

I love that Shaw has played and done well at mutiple positions, unfortunately, he's closer to 6'1" than 6'2", and 236 on a guy who looked slim in shorts doesn't inspire me to set aside my biases. He's the kind of kid I wish I could find a place to play.

I agree with you on Zach, when I read intellectual and not as physical I think second day project. I agree with Kirwin's OLB assessment, with his speed I think a place could be found on passing downs. I would hope some of the hitters on the team would inspire him, but for the moment he projects second day/situational & Special Teams player to me.
 
Last edited:
Re: Kirwin's 3-4 Draft Perspective

Interesting that all three ILB selections are perceived as run stuffers who struggle against the pass. A good read nontheless.


Also interesting that all 3 ILB selections are not named Willis, Posluszny, or Siler. What's Kirwan trying to say, if anything?
 
Re: Kirwin's 3-4 Draft Perspective

Also interesting that all 3 ILB selections are not named Willis, Posluszny, or Siler. What's Kirwan trying to say, if anything?
I'm hoping his use of a "number" of coaches and scouts allowed him to control for people trying to use his article to throw a monkey wrench into someone else's draft board. Since I never saw any of the three as good 3-4 fits, I'm hoping this is an accurate assessment from his panel.

Though we probably should check and see if PATSNUTMe needs therapy.
 
Re: Kirwin's 3-4 Draft Perspective

At least they seem to like Carriker, Spencer, Woodley, Harrell, Harris, Bishop, Shaw, and DeOssie. All players I like by the way, and have talked about. I still think Willis would be awsome behind NE's line with AD Vrabel, and Colvin playing next to him. I haven't been on Posluzny's jock so it is no surprise to me. The problem is that he is basically projecting ILB's in college who can play 3-4 ILB, but he doesn't project the DE's who can play ILB. Vrabel and Bruschi were both defensive ends.
 
Last edited:
Re: Kirwin's 3-4 Draft Perspective

That's all fine, but an almost psychotic love of violence seems like a prerequisite for ILB in the NFL. Tim Shaw's experience at both ILB and DE seems to make him an ideal ILB prospect, not OLB as Kirwan writes. I'm beating a dead horse that many people have shot more than once, but I like Siler for ILB.

Huh you need a psychotic love for violence to be an effective ILB? Give me a fundamentally sound player with a high motor any time over a mere psycho. Got to have skills too. Zak was a team leader at Brown and he has intangibles that will make him an asset at linebacker. Even if he doesn't meet your "psychotic love for violence" requirement I think he'll be a good one.

So please tell me how you measure this "psychotic love for violence" quotient and let me know how guys like Siler, Waters etc. compare in that quotient to current Patriots like Bruschi, AD, Vrabel, etc. I really would like to know how you arrived at this scientific measurement and if our current players stack up to your new requirement. Thanks! ;)
 
Last edited:
Re: Kirwin's 3-4 Draft Perspective

Huh you need a psychotic love for violence to be an effective ILB? Give me a fundamentally sound player with a high motor any time over a mere psycho. Got to have skills too. Zak was a team leader at Brown and he has intangibles that will make him an asset at linebacker. Even if he doesn't meet your "psychotic love for violence" requirement I think he'll be a good one.

So please tell me how you measure this "psychotic love for violence" quotient and let me know how guys like Siler, Waters etc. compare in that quotient to current Patriots like Bruschi, AD, Vrabel, etc. I really would like to know how you arrived at this scientific measurement and if our current players stack up to your new requirement. Thanks! ;)

The "almost psychotic love of violence" I refer to is uniquely between the lines and in no way refers to a player's behavior off-field. It takes a somewhat deranged individual to defeat blocks vs. 300 lb guards and blow up 220 lb rbs play after play, game after game, year after year. The ILB must love contact, embrace contact, live for the thrill of contact. This love of violence gives him an edge, and only with that edge can he take the field without fear, and dominate. All the great ILBs in history have exhibited this character trait... Nitschke, Huff, Butkus, Lambert, Singletary, Carson, Lewis, yes, Bruschi and Ted Johnson, too. In this draft Buster Davis has it, Willis has it, Siler has it for sure. Without it, they would be too terrified to do what has to be done at the NFL level. Unfortunately, at times elite ILBs carry this burden with them off the field and walk a dangerous line in the civilian world. BB recognizes that the ILB position requires unique and complex individuals. That is what drew him to talents such as Channing Crowder and Odell Thurman in their respective drafts, before passing on them, and why he expressed such admiration for Ernie Sims, another player who exhibits this trait in his on-field play. Your welcome (is there a middle finger icon?).
 
Last edited:
who could play 3-4 next year....

I thought that this would be a good article to post because I think alot of people are wondering who might fit into our system...this isnt breaking news and i think the articles been up for a while but didnt see it posted (sorry if it was, just delete the thread if this is a repeat). myself, i never played football - i honestly have no idea how to classify a player as "3-4" or "4-3" or what a cover 2 defense really is....anyways this is for people like me i guess who want to see some players im sure the pats have their eyes on...


http://www.nfl.com/draft/story/10066679

March 17, 2007) -- Draft boards are set up differently around the National Football League. A team that uses a 3-4 defense is going to see talent from a much different perspective than a 4-3 team, for example.

It wasn't too long ago that a team like the Pittsburgh Steelers merely had to figure out which college defensive ends could become 3-4 outside linebackers in order to continue to build their famous 3-4 package.

The Chargers figured Shawne Merriman would be a perfect fit for their 3-4 defense, and they were right.
The Chargers figured Shawne Merriman would be a perfect fit for their 3-4 defense, and they were right.
But over time, things have changed and now the Patriots, Jets, Browns, Chargers, Cowboys and 49ers are all looking for the same players. When you throw in the hybrid defenses that like to jump back and forth from 3-4 to 4-3 packages, there is a much bigger drain on all of the front-seven positions for the 3-4. Don't get me wrong -- great players can play in any scheme, but building a front-seven unit is much different.

So, where is the talent the 3-4 teams are looking for at nose tackle, defensive end, inside linebacker and, of course, the all-important outside linebackers?

There are really two basic 3-4 packages being played in the NFL today. For the lack of a better way of describing them, I will classify one package as the Charger 3-4 and the other as the Patriot 3-4.

San Diego loves to slant its defensive ends almost every play and bring at least one outside linebacker to create a four-man front after the ball is snapped. Because the ends are usually moving on the snap, they put more of a premium on quickness than the other 3-4 teams. The Patriot 3-4 calls for some movement, but will play more of a two-gap style from the defensive ends, so bulk and height are critical.

Teams that use the 4-3 are looking for edge rushers at defensive end and would most likely have a totally different draft board at DE.

At nose tackle, all of the 3-4 teams want a massive man who can command double-team blocks, and speed to stunt is not that critical. The 4-3 teams are looking for a nose tackle about 30 pounds lighter who can move and create blocking problems with stunts.

An inside linebacker in the 3-4 has to be able to take on a 320-pound guard straight up and has to have the bulk and power to neutralize him. A 4-3 inside linebacker is usually going to be lined up off the hip of the nose tackle or under tackle, and that makes it difficult for the guards to get a clean shot at him, which means lighter, quicker linebackers are what the 4-3 teams are in search of on draft weekend.

Michigan defenders Alan Branch, David Harris and LaMarr Woodley could find homes in NFL 3-4 defenses.
Michigan defenders Alan Branch, David Harris and LaMarr Woodley could find homes in NFL 3-4 defenses.
The outside backers in a 3-4 are pass rushers who can drop in coverage and are high-priced. An outside linebacker in a 4-3 usually has to be a guy who can hold off a tight-end route and be a contain player to turn back a run play to the inside. There are a number of front-seven positions in a 4-3 defense that command a bigger pay check than a 4-3 SAM backer.

In the early '90s, the few 3-4 teams could easily pick up the guys they wanted across the front seven in Rounds 4-6, but with at least seven teams looking for the same players, times have changed.

Look at the Patriots, for example. Their starting three defensive linemen are all first-round selections and they paid big money to acquire OLB Adalius Thomas this year in free agency. Ask any 3-4 defensive coordinator what he wants at every position and he will say Richard Seymour (Patriots) at defensive end, Jamal Williams (Chargers) at nose tackle, James Farrior (Steelers) at inside linebacker, and Shawne Merriman (Chargers) at outside linebacker.

I asked a number of coaches and scouts if they could help me stack a 3-4 draft board, so here are the names we came up with for a 3-4 front.
NOSE TACKLE

ALAN BRANCH, MICHIGAN (Round 1) -- He could play in any front, but at 6-foot-5, 324 pounds and 33 bench presses, he could force that double team the coaches desperately want from the nose, and he can run.

TANK TYLER, N.C. STATE (Round 2) -- Not the same size as Branch (6-2, 306) but with 42 reps on the bench, he has the power to do the job.

PAUL SOLARI, UTAH (Round 3) -- A 6-foot-4 344-pound space eater who should force that all-important extra blocker to move him, and that frees up an inside backer.
DEFENSIVE END

ADAM CARRIKER, NEBRASKA (Round 1) -- A big player (6-6, 296) who can control the line of scrimmage with his long arms and that all-important height like Seymour.

JUSTIN HARRELL, TENNESSEE (Round 2) -- He has medical issues but did well at the Combine and could be a factor (6-4, 300) at any of the three defensive-line spots.

RYAN McBEAN, OKLAHOMA STATE (Round 3) -- He can move for a big man (6-4, 286) and showed the quickness at the Senior Bowl to play in the Charger style of 3-4.
INSIDE LINEBACKERS

DAVID HARRIS, MICHIGAN (Round 2) -- Big and thick (6-2, 243) to take on a guard, and at the Combine, he ran the 40 in 4.62, but more important -- a 4.29 short shuttle, which suggests ha can change direction and get off blocks.

ANTHONY WATERS, CLEMSON (Round 4) -- Medical questions but a late workout could resolve the issue. As one scout said, "Go back and look at his junior game against N.C. State. This guy (6-2, 245) is ideal for the strong inside backer spot."

DESMOND BISHOP, CALIFORNIA (Round 5) -- A few years ago, this is the kind of guy (6-2, 239) a 3-4 team would pick up in Round 7 or as an undrafted free agent. One coach said, "Today, he could go a little higher with the 3-4 teams all looking."
OUTSIDE LINEBACKERS

ANTHONY SPENCER, PURDUE (Round 1) -- A defensive end (6-3, 261) who can run 4.7 and a 4.4 short shuttle with 27 tackles for a loss last season and 21 career sacks is a prime candidate.

LAMAR WOODLEY, MICHIGAN (Round 2) -- He's short for a defensive end (6-1, 266) but 52½ tackles for a loss and 24 sacks in his career make him a prime OLB candidate.

TIM SHAW, PENN STATE (Round 4) -- Shaw has played defensive end and linebacker (6-1, 236) and if you study the Belichick package, he loves guys who did both in college. Tedy Bruschi, Rosevelt Colvin and Mike Vrabel all had those kind of backgrounds.

ZAK DeOSSIE, BROWN (Round 4) -- I don't care that Zak played in the Ivy League; he is perfect for the 3-4 OLB spot. He runs 4.6 in the 40 and an outstanding 4.2 in the short shuttle. He's strong (6-4, 250) and productive. He has long-snapping skills like his father Steve (former NFL player) and he knows the game.

There are other players who fit the bill for the 3-4 style of defense, but where you take them with so many looking for them is a tougher question. The men running the draft process for New England (Scott Pioli), San Diego (A.J. Smith), Pittsburgh (Kevin Colbert), Cleveland (Phil Savage), the Jets (Terry Bradway), Dallas (Stephen Jones) and San Francisco (Scott McCloughan) would love to find some key players later in the draft, but I think those days are long gone.
 
Last edited:
Re: who could play 3-4 next year....

interesting article. Thanks for posting.
 
Re: who could play 3-4 next year....

Good stuff except for noting that Terry Bradway runs the Jets. I wish Terry Bradway still ran the Jets.
 
Last edited:
Re: who could play 3-4 next year....

Good stuff except for noting that Terry Bradway runs the Jets. I wish Terry Bradway still ran the Jets.

not anymore...
 
Re: who could play 3-4 next year....

I thought that this would be a good article to post because I think alot of people are wondering who might fit into our system...this isnt breaking news and i think the articles been up for a while but didnt see it posted (sorry if it was, just delete the thread if this is a repeat). myself, i never played football - i honestly have no idea how to classify a player as "3-4" or "4-3" or what a cover 2 defense really is....anyways this is for people like me i guess who want to see some players im sure the pats have their eyes on...


http://www.nfl.com/draft/story/10066679

I pro prosed to a couple of posters that I thought David Harris was the best 3-4 ILB on the board. Better than Willis. Better than Siler and not a first round reach,at all. This article confirms my opinion. Harris is not flashy,but has tremendous instincts; and he stops the run head-on.

His pass coverage was rated good when everyone thought he was a 4.8 guy, just that the couldn't cover very long. Now turns out to be a 4.55 at the combine.

I also suggested that the only DL that I was interested in was a second day pick of Paul Soliai. He was the best NT on the board, a confirmed two-gapper, and a massive guy at 6-4 345 5.11, and a better backup for Wilfork than anyone else.

I also thought that picking Zak DeOssie at the end of the third round was not a reach, in a 3-4 draft list. Another prognostication confimed by this author.
 
Pat Kirwan Article on Draft Boards of 3-4 vs. 4-3 teams

http://nfl.com/draft/story/10066679

Interesting article on how teams look at the draft. Should give us some insight on who the Pats may be targetting on the defensive side of the ball on April 28.

"(March 17, 2007) -- Draft boards are set up differently around the National Football League. A team that uses a 3-4 defense is going to see talent from a much different perspective than a 4-3 team, for example.

It wasn't too long ago that a team like the Pittsburgh Steelers merely had to figure out which college defensive ends could become 3-4 outside linebackers in order to continue to build their famous 3-4 package. The Chargers figured Shawne Merriman would be a perfect fit for their 3-4 defense, and they were right.

But over time, things have changed and now the Patriots, Jets, Browns, Chargers, Cowboys and 49ers are all looking for the same players. When you throw in the hybrid defenses that like to jump back and forth from 3-4 to 4-3 packages, there is a much bigger drain on all of the front-seven positions for the 3-4. Don't get me wrong -- great players can play in any scheme, but building a front-seven unit is much different.
"
 
Last edited:
Re: Pat Kirwan Article on Draft Boards of 3-4 vs. 4-3 teams

Dang! You just beat me to it. :)

Thought it was a very informative article for guys who like me who don't know much.
 
Re: Pat Kirwan Article on Draft Boards of 3-4 vs. 4-3 teams

Dang! You just beat me to it. :)

Haha :D. Important thing though is at least it gives us a new article to debate on other than the who's the better WR, RB, LB, in FA that we've had on here for the most part. Those things are interesting and important too, but I thought this would give the board a change of pace from a discussion standpoint.
 
Re: Pat Kirwan Article on Draft Boards of 3-4 vs. 4-3 teams

The most INTERESTING thing about this very good article is who is missing from his analysis. Patrick Willis was conspicuous in his absence at EITHER ILB or OLB. Why was that????

BTW I'm actually getting excited about the prospect of a David Harris pick at 28 I never thought I'd consider a LB in the first.
 
Last edited:
Re: Pat Kirwan Article on Draft Boards of 3-4 vs. 4-3 teams

Great article, thanks for sharing...

It will be interesting to see what round these players are drafted and by whom..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Monday Patriots Notebook 4/15: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-14, Mock Draft 3.0, Gilmore, Law Rally For Bill 
Potential Patriot: Boston Globe’s Price Talks to Georgia WR McConkey
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/12: News and Notes
Not a First Round Pick? Hoge Doubles Down on Maye
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/11: News and Notes
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft #5 and Thoughts About Dugger Signing
Matthew Slater Set For New Role With Patriots
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/10: News and Notes
Patriots Draft Rumors: Teams Facing ‘Historic’ Price For Club to Trade Down
Back
Top