pheenix11
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2006
- Messages
- 5,151
- Reaction score
- 4,777
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Is it the offense's fault because they kept going 3 and out and putting the defense back on the field or is it the defense's fault for allowing the Broncos to dominate time of possession?
Chicken or the egg? Our first two drives were 3 and out so I know where I stand on that one.
Uh, time of possession.
Deep into the middle of the 4th qtr., the Patriots got their second possession of the half.
I question how anyone can miss TOP in this game, and how thoroughly the Broncos offense dominated the Patriots D, and how the Denver punter was the missing man. When a team's punter doesn't play, that's on the defense. Look at the yardage the broncos racked up and the TOP. The Patriots D didn't stop them at all.
The Patriots offense at least, besides the 2 TDs and a field goal, had two additional long drives, one stopped by a bogus penalty on Hooman, and the other stopped by sack on 4th down. If the defense managed to stop the Broncos just once or twice more, maybe the Patriots would have had another drive as well. Good for say 3 or 7 points. Add the 10 they lost on the other 2 drives, and that's more than enough offensive production.
yes, because the offense let manning hold onto the ball for 7 and 8 minute drives... :bricks:
Both sides of the ball sucked ass yesterday.
manning had the ball for 14+ mins for 2 drives. Brady missed some throws sure but there is enough blame to go around on the defense.they didnt touch manning on defense. Easy to blame the QB and offense.
If Brady makes those throws and we score points, the flow of the game would have changed IMO. There would have been a little more pressure on the Broncos Offense and our defense would have stayed on the sideline if Brady and the O extend their drives.
In a game that we needed to be perfect to beat Peyton, Brady came up short.
Offence went 3 and out way to much and couldn't convert third and short.
If you told me before the game that Denver would only score 26 points I would be feeling really good. Offence was why we lost/Thread.
No, the offense didn't let Manning hold the ball for 7 and 8 minute drives. But they didn't take advantage of their opportunities to put up any points to force Denver to play from behind either. Manning doesn't get to kill the clock and take his time if he's trying to come back from a deficit, and New England didn't do anything offensively Sunday to give themselves a chance to take Denver out of their offense.
Don't get me wrong, I thought the defense was bad as well. Unfortunately I just thought the offense was just that much worse.
Trust this: If our offense scored more points, Denver's offense would have scored more points, too. They had two 7 minute plus drives because they had the luxury of having a big lead. They showed that their offense could do whatever they wanted with our defense. We played this game on Denver's terms, not ours.
Trust this: If our offense scored more points, Denver's offense would have scored more points, too. They had two 7 minute plus drives because they had the luxury of having a big lead. They showed that their offense could do whatever they wanted with our defense. We played this game on Denver's terms, not ours.
Oh the offense was absolute trash, including play selection but the defense was equally as bad if not worse.
Zero pressure on Manning, zero 3 n outs, no turnovers, nearly 30 first downs, 500 yards allowed and a full 11:30 more in TOP! Horrible, horrible, horrible.
That's why those opportunities early in the game were so huge. If they hit them and score twice in the early going, that changes Denver's approach.
It would have kicked Denver into fast scoring mode is all that it would have done. I agree that 14 points certainly would have helped us though.