Draft Trade Chart of picks 24 and 28

[smg93]

According to this draft trade chart http://www.profootballtalk.com/draftchart.htm

Pick 24 = 740 points

Pick 28 = 660 points

Total = 1,400 points

Pick #8 = 1,400 points


Hypothetically, what if the pats were forced to trade the two picks to acquire Houston's #8 pick, who would you get and why?

 

[IndyKen]

According to this draft trade chart http://www.profootballtalk.com/draftchart.htm

Pick 24 = 740 points

Pick 28 = 660 points

Total = 1,400 points

Pick #8 = 1,400 points


Hypothetically, what if the pats were forced to trade the two picks to acquire Houston's #8 pick, who would you get and why?

S Laron Landry- he could be a Rodney type enforcer back there for years to come.

 

[Bertil]

Although highly unlikely it will happen, I would get Landry if available. BB was rumored to want to move up for Sean Taylor so it would make the most sense. Wake Forests' Josh Gattis has reminded some people of Rodney so they may go in that direction, having the real Rodney tutor him. Incidentally, here is my mock as it stands right now (Compensation picks assumed):

Round (Overall#) Name (Position) - College

1. (24) Chris Houston (CB) - Arkansas
1. (28) Jon Beason (MLB) - Miami
2. (60) Surrendered for Wes Welker (WR)
3. (91) Jason Hill (WR) – Washington St.
3. (Comp) Paul Williams (WR) – Fresno St.
4. (123) Josh Gattis (S) – Wake Forest
5. (Comp) Tyrone Moss (RB) - Miami
6. (165) Ryan Harris (G/OT) – Notre Dame
6. (187) Jeff Rowe (QB) - Nevada
7. (219) Surrendered for Wes Welker (WR)
7. (Comp) Jeremy Clark (NT) - Alabama

I'd love to see them pry Lance Briggs from the Bears with a 2007 first rounder and a contingent 2008 pick. The way this offseason is shaping up, who can predict anything?

 

[zippo59]

if not for Landry I could see them trading up for Patrick Willis. I don't think you would have to go as high as the 8th pick to get him though.

 

[Bertil]

I don't think that Willis is as highly touted by NFL execs as he is by the draftniks. He will fall because I think his physical skills aren't as top notch as his collegiate production would indicate. That's just my opinion, so we'll see...

 

[Brady'sButtBoy]

Landry would be mighty tempting...

 

[PatsWorldChamps]

According to this draft trade chart http://www.profootballtalk.com/draftchart.htm

Pick 24 = 740 points

Pick 28 = 660 points

Total = 1,400 points

Pick #8 = 1,400 points


Hypothetically, what if the pats were forced to trade the two picks to acquire Houston's #8 pick, who would you get and why?

okoye. not a need, but in 5 years, you'll say we should have taken him

 

[smg93]

I'm impressed. I expected to see a slew of different people but so far La Ron Landry would be the overwhelming favorite. If the consensus continues to be this strong, maybe we will trade up!

 

[MDPATSFAN]

Interesting...The Welker deal represents 303.4 points for both picks.

 

[Patriotic Fervor]

According to this draft trade chart http://www.profootballtalk.com/draftchart.htm

Pick 24 = 740 points

Pick 28 = 660 points

Total = 1,400 points

Pick #8 = 1,400 points


Hypothetically, what if the pats were forced to trade the two picks to acquire Houston's #8 pick, who would you get and why?

Forced??? What are the thought processes behind this post?

 

[WhiZa]

I think the only player worth going up to the #8 slot for would be Johnson, but there's no chance he falls that far.

The next step would be trading the #24 and the #91 to move up to the #19 pick. There we could find Landry, Willis or maybe even Hall.

Drafting two first rounders is more sexy then drafting one IMO.

 

[nashvillepatsfan]

Although highly unlikely it will happen, I would get Landry if available. BB was rumored to want to move up for Sean Taylor so it would make the most sense. Wake Forests' Josh Gattis has reminded some people of Rodney so they may go in that direction, having the real Rodney tutor him. Incidentally, here is my mock as it stands right now (Compensation picks assumed):

Round (Overall#) Name (Position) - College

1. (24) Chris Houston (CB) - Arkansas
1. (28) Jon Beason (MLB) - Miami
2. (60) Surrendered for Wes Welker (WR)
3. (91) Jason Hill (WR) – Washington St.
3. (Comp) Paul Williams (WR) – Fresno St.
4. (123) Josh Gattis (S) – Wake Forest
5. (Comp) Tyrone Moss (RB) - Miami
6. (165) Ryan Harris (G/OT) – Notre Dame
6. (187) Jeff Rowe (QB) - Nevada
7. (219) Surrendered for Wes Welker (WR)
7. (Comp) Jeremy Clark (NT) - Alabama

I'd love to see them pry Lance Briggs from the Bears with a 2007 first rounder and a contingent 2008 pick. The way this offseason is shaping up, who can predict anything?

jeff rowe??? please explain.

 

[Return of the Nizz]

Laron Landry or Branch. Never too many linemen.

 

[DougGabriel2007]

Get Reggie Nelson at 24, he is a year younger than Landry and he's going to better...This kid is in that Bob Sanders/Palomalu mold of being able to cover tons of ground/hit/cover. And then there is obviously the Pats/UF connection....

 

[NEPatriot]

I think the only player worth going up to the #8 slot for would be Johnson, but there's no chance he falls that far.

The next step would be trading the #24 and the #91 to move up to the #19 pick. There we could find Landry, Willis or maybe even Hall.

Drafting two first rounders is more sexy then drafting one IMO.

I don't see us using both 1st rounders in a trade, especially after the Welker deal. While I'd love to have Landry, and I think he would be a perfect fit, I can't see him falling that far.

 

[spacecrime]

According to this draft trade chart http://www.profootballtalk.com/draftchart.htm

Pick 24 = 740 points

Pick 28 = 660 points

Total = 1,400 points

This isn't enough. The Pats screwed themselves by giving away their seventh round pick. If you add the value of that pick (3.4), THEN the Pats would have some bargaining power!

Just thing of what you could do with 1403.4 points!!

 

[solman]

According to this draft trade chart http://www.profootballtalk.com/draftchart.htm

Pick 24 = 740 points

Pick 28 = 660 points

Total = 1,400 points

Pick #8 = 1,400 points


Hypothetically, what if the pats were forced to trade the two picks to acquire Houston's #8 pick, who would you get and why?

This chart is total nonsense, because it undervalues (ignores, really) the fact that higher draft picks get higher salaries.

Any team that trades a #8 for a #24 and #28 is getting a steal, and BB knows it. You will not see us trade up in this fashion (thank god).

 

[MrBigglesWorth]

This chart is total nonsense, because it undervalues (ignores, really) the fact that higher draft picks get higher salaries.

Any team that trades a #8 for a #24 and #28 is getting a steal, and BB knows it. You will not see us trade up in this fashion (thank god).

plus what if this yrs draft is better than next year's and is deeper and has more players of value.

 

[nashvillepatsfan]

plus what if this yrs draft is better than next year's and is deeper and has more players of value.

thats something alot of people dont take into account. ya really have to look ahead(like b.b. and s.p.) and think of what needs we have, and what we'll need in the future. the draft this year will be heavy on some positions, and next year will be heavier on others.

 

[PatDaPatriot]

I would move up for Landry, Nelson, or Leon Hall. They may have the ammo to move into a position to land one of the three. I'd love Gaines Adams, Joe Thomas, or Calvin Johnson, but they don't have enough to move that far up...