PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Borges a plagiarizer?


Status
Not open for further replies.

Pat_Nasty

Third String But Playing on Special Teams
Joined
Aug 20, 2006
Messages
550
Reaction score
0
A Seahawks fan posted this over on the ESPN.com Patriots message board... if there doesn't turn out to be an explanation for it, than it could have some serious consequences:

I've heard a lot of negative stuff about Borges and I would agree with most of the negativity. He may have just crossed a new line though that doesn't involve fighting old crippled men.

I happened to run across his latest article as it mentioned the Seahawks Darrell Jackson. After reading it i noticed the entire first page of his article is stolen from a previous article written by a Seahawks beat writter.

Here are the two articles. All of the info on Jackson is taken almost word for word from Mike Sando's article.

It starts at the paragrapgh Jackson led the NFL...

Boston Globe article
http://www.boston.com/sports/football/patriots/articles/2007/03/04/seahawk_is_a_better_catch/

Tacoma News Tribune article
http://www.thenewstribune.com/sports/seahawks/story/6389428p-5698815c.html

This is a pretty serious issue in journalim maybe it will get Borges sent out of town.
 
:singing: hahahaahahaha

holy crap this guy is such a scumbag
 
Send it to the editor at the Globe and copy the Ombudsman, or did the Globe eliminate that inconvenient position?
 
No big deal. Every Sunday notes column in the country does the same thing. That is why this Borges notes column and every other have this at the bottom:

"material from personal interviews, wire services, other beat writers, and league and team sources was used in this report."
 
This guy has nine lives. He did not mention anything about "quoting" the Seattle piece in his story,
 
A Seahawks fan posted this over on the ESPN.com Patriots message board... if there doesn't turn out to be an explanation for it, than it could have some serious consequences:

There's a disclaimer at the end of the article (it's in every Sunday's football notes column, not just this one) that may cover this. Here it is verbatim:

Ron Borges's e-mail address is [email protected]; material from personal interviews, wire services, other beat writers, and league and team sources was used in this report.
 
Wow. Borges might be finished.

No wonder he has this disclaimer at the end of the article:

Ron Borges's e-mail address is
[email protected]; material from personal interviews, wire services, other beat writers, and league and team sources was used in this report.
 
someone should send that to PFT.

Even if he says that at the bottom of his articles he's a jerk and it just makes him look like a bigger jerk.


This dude is just like any troll on a messageboard (like the moron yesterday talking trash about Tedy)
He just wants to get a response and piss people off.
 
send it to florio at PFT...he'll jump ALL over it!
 
I would think there'd be a big difference between "using" materials from other sources and just ripping whole parts of other articles off.

I know I used lots of sources when I wrote reports for school, but I wasn't allowed to use them verbatim!
 
yeah that's garbage.

You can't write a book word for word and then at the end cite the original book as your source.

they taught that in English 1 and 2. I just wish i had payed attention to that stupid crap.
 
He can't plagiarize the whole article, but he can use snippets, especially with the disclaimer. I don't think he copied enough.
EDIT


I could be wrong. He's a good plagiarizer and changed enough I didn't see it side by side.

I'm in grad school and we have to take a tutorial on plagiarism.

That's what it is.
 
Last edited:
The disclaimer allows you to lift whole paragraphs verbatim?
 
No big deal. Every Sunday notes column in the country does the same thing. That is why this Borges notes column and every other have this at the bottom:

"material from personal interviews, wire services, other beat writers, and league and team sources was used in this report."

I am sure he doesnt just steal it and throw the disclaimer on it.he probably asked permision or maybe there is an agreement among the writers that it is ok
plus I think you can use a percentage of stories as long as you cite it.
 
Last edited:
There's definitely something wrong here...

Mike Sando said:
Jackson was leading the NFL in touchdowns last season when a turf-toe injury forced him to miss the final three games. The injury prevented Jackson from achieving his third 1,000-yard season in four years and the fourth overall.

Ron Borges said:
Jackson was leading the NFL in touchdowns last season when a turf-toe injury forced him to miss the final three games. The injury prevented him from reaching his third 1,000-yard season in four years, but Jackson still led Seattle with 63 catches for 956 yards and 10 touchdowns. He has made at least 60 receptions five times in seven seasons.

Sando said:
But trouble arose in March 2004 when former Seahawks president Bob Whitsitt allegedly shorted Jackson on a contract offer. Jackson said he signed the deal anyway at the urging of his father, who has since died. Whitsitt has dismissed the charge as preposterous, while Ruskell has resisted honoring a promise that a predecessor denies making.

The dispute has escalated ever since, with the Seahawks and Jackson’s agents exchanging a series of blunt letters, sources said.

Borges said:
Trouble arose with Seahawks management two years ago after former team president Bob Whitsitt allegedly shorted Jackson on a contract offer. Jackson said he signed the deal anyway at the urging of his father. Whitsitt has dismissed the charge as preposterous, while present club president Tim Ruskell has refused to honor a promise that another person denies making. The dispute has escalated, with the Seahawks and Jackson's agents exchanging blunt letters.

Sando said:
When Ruskell became Seahawks president in February 2005, one of his first moves was to issue a letter to players outlining his expectations. He urged full participation in the team’s offseason program, including minicamps, but Jackson let it be known he would honor his contract but nothing more. Jackson subsequently skipped the voluntary portions of minicamps.

Borges said:
When Ruskell became Seahawks president in February 2005, one of his first moves was to issue a letter to players outlining his expectations. He urged full participation in the team's offseason program, including minicamps, but Jackson let it be known he would honor his contract, but nothing more. Jackson subsequently skipped the voluntary portions of minicamps.

Wow, at least change a word or two.

Now Sando starts to break up into smaller paragraphs but Borges follows in style.

Sando said:
The relationship soured further after Jackson suffered a knee injury during an Oct. 2, 2005, game at Washington.

Jackson had bruised the knee earlier and experienced pain following a Sept. 25 game against Arizona. He suffered cartilage damage against the Redskins, raising questions in his mind about whether he should have been on the field at all, sources said.

The damage did not show up on initial tests. The team recommended rest. Holmgren avoided giving a timetable other than to say he thought it would be “shorter more than longer” after speaking with Jackson. The team ruled out Jackson for the next game.

Jackson, acting on the advice of Florida-based agents Mooney and Kendall Almerico, sought a second opinion from Dr. John Uribe, a prominent Miami orthopedist known for treating pro athletes.

Jackson underwent surgery to repair his right knee’s lateral meniscus, which consists of cartilage on the outer side of the knee.

He wondered if the team was trying to rush him back. The team resented the implication.

Jackson missed the next nine games, returning in time for the playoffs. He caught 20 passes for 268 yards and two touchdowns in three playoff games, leading the team in each category (Jerramy Stevens also caught two touchdown passes).

Jackson underwent a second procedure on the knee after the season. He missed minicamps and training camp, all while maintaining he would be ready for the opener. He returned for the opener; his late catch-and-run helped the Seahawks beat Detroit, 9-6.

But the team was already preparing for life without him.

The Seahawks had shipped a 2006 third-round pick to Minnesota after signing Vikings receiver Nate Burleson, a restricted free agent. Ruskell followed that deal by sending a 2007 first-round choice to New England for Branch shortly after the 2006 opener.

D.J. Hackett flashed starting potential last season, setting career highs with 45 catches for 610 yards and four touchdowns. The team is expected to retain Hackett’s rights by making one of the higher qualifying offers under rules for restricted free agents

Borges said:
Problems continued after Jackson suffered a right knee injury on Oct. 2, 2005, against Washington. Jackson had bruised the knee earlier in the season and he suffered cartilage damage against the Redskins, raising questions in his mind about whether he should have been on the field.

The cartilage damage did not show up on initial tests, and the team recommended rest. The team ruled out Jackson for the next game. Jackson, acting on the advice of his agents, sought a second opinion and later underwent surgery to repair the lateral meniscus in his right knee.

That led Jackson to wonder whether the Seahawks had rushed him back. He missed the next nine games, returning in time for the playoffs. He caught 20 passes for 268 yards and two touchdowns in three playoff games and then underwent a second procedure after the season. He missed minicamps and training camp, maintaining he would be ready for the opener, which he was.

By then the Seahawks had shipped a 2006 third-round pick to Minnesota after signing Nate Burleson, a restricted free agent, and a 2007 first-round choice to New England for Deion Branch. When D.J. Hackett also flashed potential, setting career highs with 45 catches for 610 yards and four touchdowns, it made Jackson expendable. He has three years remaining on a six-year, $25 million deal, with salaries of $3.25 million, $4 million, and $4.75 million, a good value for a team without a top receiver.
 
Last edited:
I am sure he doesnt just steal it and throw the disclaimer on it.he probably asked permision or maybe there is an agreement among the writers that it is ok
plus I think you can use a percentage of stories as long as you cite it.

He needs to cite the permission if he's going to plagiarize a whole article. That's not compiling.
 
Just sent it to Florio. :rocker:
 
Didn't the Cold Hard Football Facts accuse Borges of plaigerism about 3 or 4 months ago?
 
Re: There's definitely something wrong here...

Wow, at least change a word or two.

Now Sando starts to break up into smaller paragraphs but Borges follows in style.

This is terrible. Plus in the other article from today's BG he cites that AD can't set the edge on the run?? Did he mention that the Ravens D is designed to shoot gaps and not control gaps?

What a waste of space on a number of levels.
 
Last edited:
If Borges gets fired for plagiarism I'm expecting it to feel even better than the Adalius Thomas signing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/16: News and Notes
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/15: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-14, Mock Draft 3.0, Gilmore, Law Rally For Bill 
Potential Patriot: Boston Globe’s Price Talks to Georgia WR McConkey
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/12: News and Notes
Not a First Round Pick? Hoge Doubles Down on Maye
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/11: News and Notes
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft #5 and Thoughts About Dugger Signing
Matthew Slater Set For New Role With Patriots
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/10: News and Notes
Back
Top