PATRIOT64
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2006
- Messages
- 3,773
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Is there anyone outside of PFT that beleives that we take an Offensive Tackle with the first pick?
I say absolutely not and would be a wasted top pick,Someone there thinks our OL needs work,I say that is the least of our needs right now..That would be a boner pick IMO.
Is there anyone outside of PFT that beleives that we take an Offensive Tackle with the first pick?
I say absolutely not and would be a wasted top pick,Someone there thinks our OL needs work,I say that is the least of our needs right now..That would be a boner pick IMO.
I agree an OL with the 1st pick would be a waste. Patriots ripped off 34 points and still lost the AFC championship. The problem is on the defensive side of the ball.
As others said, OL is certainly not our biggest need but I don't look at it as a finished product that couldn't stand to be improved if the right player fell.
Also, I doubt the Patriots are basing their draft strategy on just the AFC Championship game. They'll look at every player of the entire season to decide where we need to improve and who needs to stay or go.
I think you bring up some good points in your post.
1st while I agree ol shouldnt be considered a need if the rigth player fell that you cant ingnore than take him. The game is won in the trenches plus those guys protect Brady.
2nd your point about the pats FO not going by the AFC championship game is valid and I think some people on here forget how good the Colts offense is, and would like to think that the LBs are to blame and that our De needs a complete overhaul just because of the last half in indy. They forget how well the "old guys" played throughout the season.