zippo59
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2006
- Messages
- 5,082
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Hughes is best of this bunch
What I like about him is his size. He's 6' 2" but I'm still waiting to see his 40 time because the knock on him is that he might not have the speed to stick with NFL receivers on deep routes. He certainly knows how to get interceptions though.
6"2...try
5"10 1/2
@ Senior Bowl..dont listen to team sites..they lie
Maybe but draft sites have extensive coverage of the Senior Bowl and I saw no mention of the correction. The combine will tell for sure.
um Senior Bowl offical measurments are OFFICAL..he was listed as 5"10 1/2 lbs
im positive
note: extremely muscular and cut
The Cal site actually lists him as 5-11 but weirdly all the draft sites have him at 6-2.
Cal changed it..i def. remember seeing Hughes at 6"2 on their site
Hughes 'shocked' everyone yesterday by measuring in at only 5'10" after being listed at 6'2". However, his height hasn't stopped him from making plays.
You are right. This is from the Senior Bowl part of footballsfuture.com
I knew people stretched the truth but four inches is a BIG stretch.
Marcus McCauley sucks! Of the five listed, McCauley is the one most likely to be a bust.
Four inches CAN mean alot in ANY game - Ask most women
Cornerback has to be a first round priority for the Pats. They should
consider trading up a little to get ther best available.