It works for me if Lloyd is a 3rd down WR only. If Ballard has any pass catching skills, then the triple TE threat/depth plus the OP roster is more than enough. Time to diminish the small ball mindset and get the play action game working again with a legit deep threat.
I'd rather have Wes than Jennings, but the bottom line is that if we add a high draft pick to some receiving group resembling last year's, I think we're OK. I know it makes a lot of people - maybe even Tom Brady - feel a little uneasy, but we're going to have to rely on a rookie at WR if we want to appreciably improve the group that we have.
I'd rather have Wes than Jennings, but the bottom line is that if we add a high draft pick to some receiving group resembling last year's, I think we're OK. I know it makes a lot of people - maybe even Tom Brady - feel a little uneasy, but we're going to have to rely on a rookie at WR if we want to appreciably improve the group that we have.
I could live with it. Ive been a big proponent of the Pats passing offense getting away from the "over the middle" stuff and working the ball more to the outside. More balance. We still have Gronk, Ahern and Edelman if resigned to do that. Its just unfortunate that Welkers contract is up and he would be the odd man out. Jennings a better option on the numbers and #1 WR then Lloyd, and in turn making Lloyd a better option on the other side as a #2. The Draft is deep with WR so we could use a 2nd rounder on a WR (and maybe add a day 2 or 3 WR) to add depth.
They could do alot more then add a couple of corners. Add a safety and beef up the Dline. Talib, DRC, D Bryant and Reed. That would make the D alot better. Then draft a couple of WR with the first couple of picks.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
