Manning-lovers in the media have been waiting three years to put those ass kissing articles up.
Some of the stuff is just laughable. For instance:
You might think that so much poor play would relegate them to the middle tier of NFL champions, but I think it means that the 2006 Colts, playoff edition, were so dominant that they could fall asleep for entire quarters and still win convincingly. The team the Colts put on the field for Super Bowl XLI will go down as one of the best in history.
...
So note to the rest of the league: look out. Peyton Manning and the more-dominant-than-you-think Colts may not be one and done when it comes to winning Super Bowls.
I mean, just imagine what these Colts would have done to teams in the playoffs if they had actually played well.
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/6441418
Indy finally wins with a team that probably isn't as good as they were two, three years ago, and all of a sudden the rest of the NFL better "watch out". The guy that wrote this article acts like the Colts were the only team in the league that had to face adversity, or are the only SB winning team that had to.