PatriotFan77
Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2011
- Messages
- 1,455
- Reaction score
- 8
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I thought the Pats should have won the game, but didn't "deserve" too. The reasons I thought they didn't "deserve" it:
1. Their intensity and focus seemed lacking, to an extent that I haven't seen since the 2010 Cleveland game. Arizona played with more intensity, and gave me the impression that they wanted it more.
2. The team made too many mistakes in key spots. Missing game winning field goals. Giving up points on ST turnovers.
3. There were too many sloppy mistakes and penalties, and the Pats failed to capitalize on several opportunities.
With that in mind, by those standards Philadelphia probably didn't "deserve" to beat Baltimore, and the Giants probably didn't "deserve" to beat Tampa Bay. But both teams hung in and made enough plays to win. The Pats hung in too, and then couldn't convert when it counted.
It wasnt that difficult to win in the end. Kick the ball in. But we choked, becoming a habit now.
Good post, but I am going to comment on this one point.
I will never understand how a fan determines what the intensity of the team was from their TV set.
The Patriots didn't make as many plays as they needed to today, but why would we need to guess that they were ambivalent or didn't care to focus?
How come whenever we win, we were great, and its not the other team lack focus and intensity?
They deserved to have the game come down to one or two critical plays that could have decided it either way.
I have a razor blade on my wrist as I say this but Eli looks like the new Brady:bricks:
Good post, but I am going to comment on this one point.
I will never understand how a fan determines what the intensity of the team was from their TV set.
The Patriots didn't make as many plays as they needed to today, but why would we need to guess that they were ambivalent or didn't care to focus?
How come whenever we win, we were great, and its not the other team lack focus and intensity?
I have a razor blade on my wrist as I say this but Eli looks like the new Brady:bricks:
You should toss the razor blade and visit the optometrist.
Yup... and that's where the holding call comes in.
I have a razor blade on my wrist as I say this but Eli looks like the new Brady:bricks:
You're right Eli didn't comeback today, I clearly saw them lose.
Eli threw 3 picks today. Brady is has averaged 8.5 ints the last 2 seasons.
I think it's safe to say he's surpassed Brady
9. The game day threads are an embarrassment. Every missed play turns into hand wringing, epithets being hurled at the players involved, and cries of doom. Some "fans" seem to take delight in seeing the team fail. We're so spoiled by the sustained success of this team.
If you think coming back in a game vs the Buccaneers is where the bar is set for GOAT, you need more than an optometrist.
And who actually won their game? In a comeback?
And who actually won their game? In a comeback?
In no particular order:
1. The Pats didn't deserve to win today. Too many mistakes, too many blown opportunities. FGs instead of TDs. Blocked punt. Missed 2-point conversion. Missed game-winning FG. Just not good enough.
2. The refs stunk and may have changed the course of the game, but that doesn't change the fact that the Pats didn't deserve to win.
3. Arizona has a legitimate defense, and they dominated our OL. Scar has some work to do before next Sunday night.
4. The special teams cost us 10 points with the blocked punt and the missed GF. Scott O'Brien has some owrk to do before next Sunday night.
5. The defense was awesome, and it's a shame the rest of the team let them down. They held Arizona to 245 yards overall, and gave up 20 points only because of the blocked punt. They made several big plays, including one in crunch time (when people were deriding them for "letting the team down once again") which gave the team an opportunity to win the game.
6. One loss means nothing. Especially a non-conference loss. The 2003 SB team lost it's opener 31-0. We've seen time and time again that the teams that start the season looking unbeatable are seldom the ones hoisting the Lombardi Trophy at the end of the season. This is a young team, and I'm much more interested in how they finish than how they start.
7. With that in mind, the overall focus and intensity was poor. The team seemed flat and out of sync, and just didn't play with the same intensity and energy as last week, except for the defense. I suspect we'll see a different performance next week, but the lack of focus and consistency is somewhat concerning.
8. The Packers and Giants are 1-1, and both have a ton of problems. The Saints are 0-2. The Ravens lost to Philadelphia and gave up almost 500 yards of total offense. So one of the might Pats or the might Ravens will start their season 1-2 after next week's debacle. But I wouldn't count the loser out of the AFC race.
9. The game day threads are an embarrassment. Every missed play turns into hand wringing, epithets being hurled at the players involved, and cries of doom. Some "fans" seem to take delight in seeing the team fail. We're so spoiled by the sustained success of this team.