KDPPatsfan85
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2008
- Messages
- 7,657
- Reaction score
- 10,631
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.We could probably sign Anderson & Carter for what it would cost to get Wimbley. I think that is the prudent course of action.
All depends on what scheme BB would like to run as the base next year. If it's a 3-4, Carter and Anderson don't fit as well. I'd still expect to sign one of them for the sub packages, but Wimbley (in theory) would fit better at 3-4 OLB.
So he'll fit right in with the rest of our LB core?Wimbley blows in coverage
All depends on what scheme BB would like to run as the base next year. If it's a 3-4, Carter and Anderson don't fit as well. I'd still expect to sign one of them for the sub packages, but Wimbley (in theory) would fit better at 3-4 OLB.
Wimbley... sounds like some Brit woosey name
(ducking)
I would rather have Ninkovich and Cunningham as OLBs in the 34 base, with Carter and Anderson as sub package DEs than have Wimbley in both roles. In fact I think we are stronger BOTH in base and sub that way, providing Carter is 90% of his preinjury self.
Thats Cameron Wimbley to you Sir.....:snob:Wimbley... sounds like some Brit woosey name
(ducking)
I would rather have Ninkovich and Cunningham as OLBs in the 34 base, with Carter and Anderson as sub package DEs than have Wimbley in both roles. In fact I think we are stronger BOTH in base and sub that way, providing Carter is 90% of his preinjury self.
Cunningham? I'd be careful about hitching my wagon up to that guy.
you are thinking of Wembley stadium in Britain
I'll take him if he's cheap.