SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.How is this even a debate? If both are available, Wallace is the first choice hands down. Dude is a complete stud and way younger.
I'm torn between who I want most... Lloyd alot cheaper (presumably) and JMD's buddy but older. Then Wallace, would need a 1st rounder plus his high salary but hes 26 years old and has immense speed and great hands... Who do we all prefer?
Is there any real chance we could keep Welker and get both Wallace and Lloyd? And in the process drop Ocho and maybe even Branch...?
I can't see BB laying out much more than $3 mil/yr on any WR who doesn't have experience in his system.
Wallace is not going to happen, way too expensive. Anybody hoping for Wallace, Ray Rice, or Mario Williams hope you're prepared for disappointment.
I agree with 2 out 3 on this statement. I will not be at all surprised to see us go hard after Mario Williams.
...Do we really want to sign Welker AND one of these guys? Thats a lot of money to tie up on receivers....
This torn between two choices reminds me about late HS. The strawberry blonde or the brunette?
Good times. Good times.
Give me Lloyd and a late first round pick as opposed to Wallace.
all things being equal, you would think it'd be a no brainer with Wallace. However, things are not equal. Considerations
(1) Difficulty of NE System - we did see Chad Johnson struggle picking up the offense. Can Wallace pick up the offense? Probably, but we pretty much know Lloyd can pick it up. +Lloyd (i think)
(2) Monetary Price - i would think Wallace would be more expensive on a per year basis. + Lloyd
(3) Other Price - Draft pick. It will cost at least a 1st rounder for Wallace. Just cash for Lloyd. + Wallace
(4) Ability - people can sure argue, but I think Wallace is a better player. + Wallace
(5) Fit - I think both players fit our offense. We need a deep ball to open up lanes in the middle of field for Gronk, Hernandez and presumably Welker. =
As an aside, an argument against both. Do we really want to sign Welker AND one of these guys? Thats a lot of money to tie up on receivers. I understand we need a vertical threat, but im guessing there are cheaper options (albeit less talented) out there that can help us. Further, was offense our problem? I would say no. an argument can be made that our D doesnt give up points, but it struggled getting off the field, and as a result, Brady was on the field on less possessions. I personally would love an elite pass rusher if we were to spend big bucks in free agency/Trade Market. Osi, Mario Williams, whoever
Er, No.
Lloyd is 31yrs old. Wallace is 26yrs old. Advantage: Wallace
Both are 6'0".
Wallace is faster than Lloyd.
Lloyd is a "me me" person. Ala, Moss.
Yes, Patriots would have to fork over 31st pick. But, you are getting a legit WR...
Big problem is that Patriots will get outbid by either Bengals, Ravens, 49ers, or Browns.
You forgot, that AGE is a major factor, especially as a WR. Lloyd is 31. Wallace will be 26. That's a 5 yr difference. Who do you want to give a 4/5 yr deal?