KoolAid
On the Game Day Roster
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2010
- Messages
- 306
- Reaction score
- 95
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Thoughts?
Don't. Worry.
They only way Gronk won't finish the game is if they have to saw his foot off.
Man, if I could have one wish, it would be for Gronk to not get injured in the AFCCG. World peace can wait 'til I get another one.
I still think Ridley should be active to provide a threat for the long run....Faulk is useless other than being a blocker IMHO...
The only long run I see him being involved in is the long run the Giants defender will be making toward our endzone, with a bakery fresh fumble that Ridley just served up.
The only long run I see him being involved in is the long run the Giants defender will be making toward our endzone, with a bakery fresh fumble that Ridley just served up.
I am optimistic about Gronk playing and playing effectively, but what is plan b if he can't or doesn't make it through the whole contest?
Do they activate Butler, or swing Vollmer at RT and use Solder at TE?
Thoughts?
Carson Butler has no business on a 53-man roster.
I have to agree. In a game of this magnitude you want the guy who has never fumbled. It doesn't mean that he wouldn't in the big game (as there is a first time for everything), but give me BJGE. I doubt the Giants would be fearing anything about Ridley anyway. They're not a running team. The Giants are preparing for a passing team right now, I'm guessing.
So if (which is the premise of this thread) Gronkowski should not be able to play next Sunday, you are comfortable with the Pats going into the game with Aaron Hernandez as their only tight end on the Super Bowl game day roster?