- Joined
- Apr 3, 2006
- Messages
- 26,060
- Reaction score
- 52,095
I've been saying for a while that I think Gronkowski is more valuable than Moss (yes, even Moss in '07!) because he improves the running game in addition to opening up the field with double teams. I also think he is more of an emotional leader on the field. I am curious, which player do you think is/was more instrumental to the Pats offense? If Gronk were to go down, how deep would this ship sink compared to if Moss had been injured?
This isn't to say Welker isn't as valuable as either one of them, but that's another discussion.
This isn't to say Welker isn't as valuable as either one of them, but that's another discussion.