PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Bill Polian: Hypocrite warning


Status
Not open for further replies.
Even if the Rams got the top spot would they take Luck? They just drafted Bradford a couple years ago. And lately there have been questions about how good luck will be in the pros.

Were the Lambs to be #1 they should and would trade it for a plethora of picks and build around Bradford. Maybe if he had a decent OC... :)
 
Even if the Rams got the top spot would they take Luck? They just drafted Bradford a couple years ago. And lately there have been questions about how good luck will be in the pros.

I'd imagine they'd stick with Bradford — who was excellent as a rookie — and cash in the #1 pick via trade, build their franchise. (Maybe the Colts will trade 2 and 34 :) )
 
Well said. Sports 'journalism' is largely a joke. I sincerely believe any regular poster with a semi command of grammar could replace the 'elite' with little drop off from its current state.

Unfortunately, hard news journalism often falls within the same quality category as sports journalism.

Bobby Knight put it best,

“All of us learn to write in the second grade. Most of us go on to greater things.”
 
Were the Lambs to be #1 they should and would trade it for a plethora of picks and build around Bradford. Maybe if he had a decent OC... :)

Exactly. There are several teams who would trade the house to get Luck, so St. Louis or Indy (if Manning is healthy) are going get a pretty good haul of picks for the #1.

The Rams will lose today, and, Poilan being the utter slimeball and hypocrite he is, there is no chance in hell that Indy will win today.
 
I think it would be great if the Rams got the #1 pick and used it to pick Luck. The tumult throughout the NFL would be well worth it.
 
Last edited:
I think it would be great if the Rams got the #1 pick and used it to pick Luck. The tumult throughout the NFL would be well worth it.

Absolutely; would be VERY entertaining. And though he gave Polian a free ride on his quote, King did a nice job in the article reflecting on how little things can affect NFL history.

"
Imagine how history would have been changed if the Packers just did what they should have done that day in Tempe and lost. Aikman a Packer. Barry Sanders, most likely, a Cowboy. And who knows what happens with the rest of the draft. But think further. With Aikman, the Packers likely wouldn't have been the pathetic team that hired Ron Wolf late in 1991 to be the GM. And Mike Holmgren likely wouldn't have been hired. And surely Brett Favre wouldn't have arrived in trade early in 1992.
"
 
Is the hypocrisy from an earlier stance or just this article? I am confused as to what King should have called him on.

Correct.

There's nothing to call him on - yet. He doesn't have Luck. Yet.

But there's no question that the depths of the suckiness demonstrated by the Colts this season has led some to question whether they were "sucking on purpose" as it were.

This happens to take place at a time when the Colts existing, albeit much older, franchise QB is out with a career threatening injury.. with a GM and owner known for working to adapt any and every rule to their favor. So I do believe players could have been quietly instructed that its in their best interest to have a franchise QB for the next 15 years. That's common sense and they all likely know it.

The only problem is other people, including some in the media have noticed some of that more blatant lack of effort and Poilan's been under much more intense scrutiny about how much effort his players are giving.

I think its possible that the league has been pressuring Polian regarding the transparent sham and he began to get pressure to win - and to posture as if they'd been trying to win all along - hence the talk of firing Caldwell too - an an actual attempt by the Colts to win a few to make this "look good" for the Commissioner.

So here we are now - did the Colts lose enough games to get the #1 pick and win enough to make it look like they were trying to win?

Or is public pressure prompting Polian to cave into PR pressure and pressure his team to win - even if that means losing out on Luck?

I think the NFL needs a scandal like that like a hole in the head - and Polian's ironically under real pressure to win today. He's hoping he can win and still get Luck I'm sure though.
 
Last edited:
Is the hypocrisy from an earlier stance or just this article? I am confused as to what King should have called him on.

Sorry, just saw this.

The hypocrisy, IMO, is from Polian's quotes about "giving 100 percent in every game" — and how a winning franchise would never do any less ever — with the fact that HIS COLTS deliberately threw away a chance at a 16-0 regular season in '09 by benching most of their key players in that game against the Jets. Seemed to me the door was wide open for King to pounce on that contradiction and knock Polian of his self-righteous high horse.
 
King doesn't call him on it because being a media toady is all about accessibility. Confront and confound a source and you're toast. I have SO little respect for the profession and its practitioners.

IMHO, there's a whole lot of disrespect to throw around.

I'd include the athletes, agents and execs use their favorites in the press to put out things they won't say themselves.

How many times do we hear "league sources" or "team sources" or "sources close to X"?

In my mind, Parcells did this kind of **** all the time, and his relationship with McDonough reeked. Note how McDonough's "journalism" dropped off a cliff just as soon as BP left town.

And I agree, journalists are a dime a dozen with little to distinguish them, so it is all about access. Go too far, and there's no difficulty in finding another journalist to talk to.

The whole thing is a farce. Even before they hit high school, athletes know all the boring, meaningless "right things to say". There's way too many media members chasing after way too little of substance to report. How often do we see someone put a mike into an athlete's face and already know what the answer is going to be before the end of the question?

There's nothing to call him on - yet. He doesn't have Luck. Yet.

Nor will he, unless he trades up with the Rams.

The only problem is other people, including some in the media have noticed some of that more blatant lack of effort and Poilan's been under much more intense scrutiny about how much effort his players are giving.

So are a lot of teams. NYJ, NYG and DAL all come to mind immediately.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/23: News and Notes
MORSE: Final 7 Round Patriots Mock Draft, Matthew Slater News
Bruschi’s Proudest Moment: Former LB Speaks to MusketFire’s Marshall in Recent Interview
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/22: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-21, Kraft-Belichick, A.J. Brown Trade?
MORSE: Patriots Draft Needs and Draft Related Info
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/19: News and Notes
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf’s Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/18/24
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/18: News and Notes
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/17: News and Notes
Back
Top