- Joined
- Feb 8, 2005
- Messages
- 43,527
- Reaction score
- 24,118
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Well, if they ended up trading him to the Redkins that means he was available for trade. By that known fact (which is known because he was traded) he was available for us to acquire.
edit: Bottom line, I'm smarter than you. Deal with it.
BTW, Since Haslett was the line coach for Carriker in St. Louis, it's more likely that the Skins contacted the Rams about him.. But, you keep on saying that the Pats could have traded for him without any proof to support that idea..
wait! Who is he?
No but I'm interested in meeting him. He seems smart. Or did did the 99% scum of this forum chase away yet another brilliant Football mind?
I wouldn't resort to calling anyone 'scum' in here ..there are better terms to use to voice your displeasure of thier disagreements,please use respect if you can.
Well, if they ended up trading him to the Redkins that means he was available for trade. By that known fact (which is known because he was traded) he was available for us to acquire.
edit: Bottom line, I'm smarter than you. Deal with it.
I'm not even going to go into explaining the obvious fact that he was available to trade for again.
Just some schlub playing 3-4 DE that has more sacks than anyone on our team.
There is no relevance to your post. The Reskins play a single gap system. The Pats play a 2 gap system. Also, how do you know that the Rams even contacted the Patriots about Carriker? Oh. That's right. You don't. It's pure BS speculation with no fact to support it.