BTW, you should read your own posts. You claim that "I don't think it should simply be dismissed." That is you imposing your ideas on the teammates because you have no idea if they would dismiss it or not. DUH.
This has got to get the award for the dumbest post ever. I'm imposing my ideas because I don't believing in dismissing an action that could negatively impact others? Do simply dismiss it and assume "His team will be fine, they're probably happy for him" is to impose a positive spin on it, to automatically assume they're pissed and hate him would be to assume a negative one, I did neither, I said that he's not honoring his word to that and his actions
could impact them in a very bad way. Learn to read.
As for your claim that Payton and Loomis attempting to convince Kreautz to stay, yes it does affect careers and lives. Mainly Kreutz's, but also Tennant's and Brees'. But if you think that Payton and Loomis immediately thought that then you are disrespecting both of them greatly because you are assuming that their first reaction would only be about the team and not about Kreautz. There is another possible scenario. One that isj ust as likely. That Payton saw things in film that didn't support Kreutz's idea that he didn't have the passion to play anymore. One of the things that you don't seem to realize is that many people are their own worst critics.
I don't know about the details of their conversations and don't pretend to, all I know is that Payton wants him to stay, which makes evident Payton's preference for him NOT to leave.
Also, because neither you, I nor the agent actually know the full extent of the conversation, we don't know exactly what Payton said. Nor do we know what the agent asked Kreutz, exactly, because we don't have a transcript. He could have just asked Kreutz "Did they try and talk you into staying?".
I can't form an opinion on unknowns, I know what Kreutz said and that Payton wanted him to stay, and I'm basing my opinion on that.
I read just fine. The problem is that you can't even follow your own posts. See, you threw a hissy fit when patchick replied to you go so far as to say:
Yet, you claim that Kreutz is honorless...
Like I said, throwing stuff out to see what sticks..
Ok, I said "
this is
an...
thing to do".
Patchick said "I'd think hard about...before saying
he has no integrity.
As much as I love and admire Patchick I do think she didnt do a good job here, I didnt claim Kreutz had no integrity, I referred to a specific action by him. There's a difference, you see. Can a generally bad person perform a good act? Can a generally good person pull a jerk move? Of course, it happens all the time.
I don't know much about Kreutz and didnt attempt to make a broad judgment of him but I did judge that specific action.
Clearly, you are the one who has never thought logically in your life. You are going around making judgments about a player without all the facts. Not I. In fact, YOU are damning him pretty badly by calling him classless, honorless and saying that his actions lack integrity. YOU are the one who should never serve on a jury because you are the one who has automatically assumed things with no evidence at all to support your claim.
Umm.. You've made assumptions about him through out this thread.. Where the hell do you get off claiming otherwise? YOU are the one who needs to take a basic class in logic, not I. As for reading, I've proven I read just fine. I've also proven to be very good with logic and not making assumptions. You, on the other hand, try to pass your ideas off as truth and try to impose your ideas on players without even a modicum of evidence to support your claims.
See my above response. I didnt say "Kreutz was classless", I'm terribly sorry that my actual words are getting in the way of your argument and you feel the need to impose even more of your ideas.
You're argument that "I don't have all the facts" is especially weak, as none of us do, so should every human need to without forming an opinion on a subject or should we make opinions on the information available to us?
That said, since you don't have all the facts either why are you assuming
any position on Kreutz's actions, after all
you don't have all the facts