JoeSixPat
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2004
- Messages
- 10,671
- Reaction score
- 1,043
Everyone seems to be calling for Doc's head these days.
Although I don't follow the Celts all that closely anymore, I'm not expecting that any coach is going to have these guys competeing for a Championship this year or next.
So my only real question is, is whether or not Doc is helping or hurting the development of the young talent on this team?
Are they developing and getting better, or are they remaining static?
I don't discount that learning to win can also be a big part of a players's development, and lord knows there's not been enough of that this year, but all I care about is whether or not Doc is the right teacher to make sure that these years with so many losses are worth it down the road.
If the organization thinks that a better coach can be a better teacher and make the players work harder on their own development, then they should get that person in here and get rid of Doc.
Otherwise, Doc should stay.
Although I don't follow the Celts all that closely anymore, I'm not expecting that any coach is going to have these guys competeing for a Championship this year or next.
So my only real question is, is whether or not Doc is helping or hurting the development of the young talent on this team?
Are they developing and getting better, or are they remaining static?
I don't discount that learning to win can also be a big part of a players's development, and lord knows there's not been enough of that this year, but all I care about is whether or not Doc is the right teacher to make sure that these years with so many losses are worth it down the road.
If the organization thinks that a better coach can be a better teacher and make the players work harder on their own development, then they should get that person in here and get rid of Doc.
Otherwise, Doc should stay.