SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Wilkerson or Heyward would have been great 3-4 ends for the Pats. With them both gone I don't see the value at #33. Almost certain some team trades up for Andy Dalton or Gabe Carimi, not positions of need for Pats.
Bears took Carimi...
Otherwise, I definitely agree...
Wilkerson or Heyward would have been great 3-4 ends for the Pats. With them both gone I don't see the value at #33. Almost certain some team trades up for Andy Dalton or Gabe Carimi, not positions of need for Pats.
That's nice, I say lets take 2011 off by taking a dive in the 2011 season and we will have great Draft choices in 2012.
Maybe we can trade all of our picks tomorrow into 2012!
Let's see...have we bettered our-self for 2011?....And the answer to that is?..... no. Solder is a year away. He might as well sit on the couch with me and watch the games so he doesn't get hurt.
I can see him trading down to third and forth choices Friday then listening to the media say what a genius he is.
One good Draft in five years qualifies I guess.
Oh well. To be expected.
Does anyone know of a phone company in Foxborough who can disconnect the phones at the Razor Friday so Bill can't trade down anymore?
DW Toys
Best guess, #33 goes to Seattle for their late #2 this year (57) and a second next year.
Seattle takes Dalton, jumping ahead of Cinncinnati
Best guess, #33 goes to Seattle for their late #2 this year (57) and a second next year.
Seattle takes Dalton, jumping ahead of Cinncinnati
i think you only trade the 33 for a first rounder in 2012. anything less and it defeats the purpose.
And then next year, we trade the Seattle second for a pick in 2013....etc etc. And from 17, 28, and 33 we wind up with Solder and three late round seconds. Huh? And by the way, no team with #1 next year is going to trade the Andrew Luck spot.
Instead, why not be bold? Why not take a gamble on premium talent? Take Mallett at 33 and be done with it.
I think you can move down and get two seconds, one this year and one next
thats the 33rd pick for a 2nd rounder in 2012. we would be getting a lower 2nd round pick to make up for our lost 33rd. why trade a very high second round pick in 2011 for a second rounder in 2012?? just make the pick at 33 and be done with it.
The Pats are on schedule to end up with 31 picks in the first round one year. The other pick in the draft will be held by the Colts because Polian is difficult to trade with.
And then next year, we trade the Seattle second for a pick in 2013....etc etc. And from 17, 28, and 33 we wind up with Solder and three late round seconds. Huh? And by the way, no team with #1 next year is going to trade the Andrew Luck spot.
Instead, why not be bold? Why not take a gamble on premium talent? Take Mallett at 33 and be done with it.