PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Which was the worse mistake: giving up Welker or Woodhead?


THE HUB FOR PATRIOTS FANS SINCE 2000

MORE PINNED POSTS:
Avatar
Replies:
312
Very sad news: RIP Joker
Avatar
Replies:
316
OT: Bad news - "it" is back...
Avatar
Replies:
234
2023/2024 Patriots Roster Transaction Thread
Avatar
Replies:
49
Asking for your support
 

Which mistake was worse?


  • Total voters
    114
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

ctpatsfan77

PatsFans.com Supporter
PatsFans.com Supporter
Joined
Jan 22, 2005
Messages
30,992
Reaction score
15,547
In one corner, the JEST gave up Woodhead for absolutely nothing to keep Joe McKnight.

In the other corner, the LOLphins only put a second-round tag on Welker, basically guaranteeing the Patriots would swoop in and take him off their hands (after all, Welker was basically guaranteed to be as useful as anyone the Patriots could have drafted with that second-rounder). Even better, the LOLphins used the pick on center Samson Satele, who they traded away for a 2009 6 and a swap of 2009 4s. :D
 
Which was worst for the Fins or Jets? Jets made a bigger mistake. They got nothing in return.

Which one benefit the Pats more? Welker
 
In one corner, the JEST gave up Woodhead for absolutely nothing to keep Joe McKnight.

In the other corner, the LOLphins only put a second-round tag on Welker, basically guaranteeing the Patriots would swoop in and take him off their hands (after all, Welker was basically guaranteed to be as useful as anyone the Patriots could have drafted with that second-rounder). Even better, the LOLphins used the pick on center Samson Satele, who they traded away for a 2009 6 and a swap of 2009 4s. :D

Welker by a landslide

In 5 years ask again. Right now Woodhead is a nice player, but he hasn't proven that he will continue to be. I'm not saying it won't happen, it just hasn't happened yet. OTOH year in and year out Wes is one of the best recievers in the league. The fact that Woody was free and Wes cost a second rounder is inconsequential.
 
All i know is when the Bills get a white skilled position player... History says we should grab him.
 
Which was worst for the Fins or Jets? Jets made a bigger mistake. They got nothing in return.

Which one benefit the Pats more? Welker

On the surface it may look like the Jets lost because they got nothing in return, but in reality the Jets win because the Dolphins went backwards.

The Dolphins got a second round pick and the priviledge of playing Welker twice a season. Since the Dolphins drafted a sorry center, they actually lost Welker and had to pay a stiff for years of next to nothing. Which means they are out Welker and cash! That is going backwards.

The Jets win because they only have to play againsat Woodhead twice a year, they didn;t lose anything else, except maybe their pride, intergrity and moral compass. (All of which the Jets can regain by sacking Ryan and rehiring Rich Kotite.)
 
Welker by far in my book as of right now...
 
On the surface it may look like the Jets lost because they got nothing in return, but in reality the Jets win because the Dolphins went backwards.

The Dolphins got a second round pick and the priviledge of playing Welker twice a season. Since the Dolphins drafted a sorry center, they actually lost Welker and had to pay a stiff for years of next to nothing. Which means they are out Welker and cash! That is going backwards.

The Jets win because they only have to play againsat Woodhead twice a year, they didn;t lose anything else, except maybe their pride, intergrity and moral compass. (All of which the Jets can regain by sacking Ryan and rehiring Rich Kotite.)

But the Dolphins had an adequate replacement in Bess and the Jets only have LT. :D
 
Woodhead. Jets got nothing back for him and now he's a big time contributor to the Pats offense.
At least Miami got a 2nd and a 7th for Welker. He has far outperformed what they got in return but they got something.

The Dolphins got a second round pick and the priviledge of playing Welker twice a season. Since the Dolphins drafted a sorry center, they actually lost Welker and had to pay a stiff for years of next to nothing. Which means they are out Welker and cash! That is going backwards.

The Jets win because they only have to play againsat Woodhead twice a year, they didn;t lose anything else, except maybe their pride, intergrity and moral compass. (All of which the Jets can regain by sacking Ryan and rehiring Rich Kotite.)

How are those two bolded parts different points? Both teams play the Pats twice a year...
Also, didn't Woodhead go off for 100+ yards against the Jets?
 
Last edited:
The Jets and Dolphins mistake was the same: neither knew how to get the best value out of the player.

Woodhead remaining a Jet and Welker remaining a Dolphin would have both been OK players, occasionally showing flashes of what could have been but basically rotting away. (Woodhead maybe not as much, he's younger and could have gotten a break as a starter through injuries and impressed, but the Jets are so overly influenced by "star power" that he'd never be what he has become here.)
 
Welker, not even close
 
Given Welkers stay in NE and what all he has done I think its Miami's dumbest decision to trade him. Not to mention they had to hire Brandon marshall since there wasnt enough on Ginn Jr. and Co couldn't be playmakers. Woodys turn will come next year and years to come to get back at the Rats!
 
Last edited:
The Dolphins lost more because Welker was a functional player for them. he hit the pats screen because nobody could cover him.

The Jets didn't lose on Woody because they never used him. It would be different if they could have traded but that seems unlikely.

The best tools are useless if no craftsman is around to use to their potential.
 
It's a weird question, because it assumes players have equal value even on different teams. Some players fit -- Welker and Branch on the Patriots. Some don't. Adalius Thomas probably would have been better on the Ravens than he was here.

The Patriots track record of getting players to perform at a higher level than elsewhere is really good, but that doesn't necessary mean that the value the Patriots get out of the player is equal to the value that the other team gave up.

Also, it's a bit revisionist to say that the Dolphins "gave up" Welker. I don't think they wanted to let him walk. The problem is that they tendered him too low. They took a gamble, and perhaps didn't realize the value they had, and it cost them. People seem to remember this as a straight trade where we gave up a 2d and 7th for Welker, but it didn't really go down like that. They tendered him too low, we threatened the poison pill, and then threw in the 7th to make it a trade and avoid the unpleasantness of the poison pill, which Kraft seemed to think was a good move. Misjudging and tendering a player too low is, surely, an error. But the reality is that Welker was a UFA and had options, if not that year next. Woodhead was just a cut.
 
The Jets and Dolphins mistake was the same: neither knew how to get the best value out of the player.

Woodhead remaining a Jet and Welker remaining a Dolphin would have both been OK players, occasionally showing flashes of what could have been but basically rotting away. (Woodhead maybe not as much, he's younger and could have gotten a break as a starter through injuries and impressed, but the Jets are so overly influenced by "star power" that he'd never be what he has become here.)

Excellent post. I'm in full agreement with you here.

It still has to be Welker though because of his production to date.
 
Welker obviously. What was NY going to use Woodhead for? He wasn't going to break through on their depth chart, no need for him.
 
Welker is clearly the better player, but the Dolphins at least got a second and seventh rounder for him. The Jets got nothing for Woodhead.

Personally, I doubt either organization would have maximized the potential of either player. So they really didn't lose anything that would have improved their team in my eye. I think Welker would never have turned into a great WR with the Dolphins and their crappy QBs and offense. I also think Woodhead would have never seen the field on offense with the Jets. Where they were hurt is helping the Pats be the best team in the division by making them better.
 
I think you gotta say Welker purely based on useability. Schottenheimer isn't smart enough to find ways to utilize Woodhead, but Welker was getting reps in Miami. On second thought, neither. Neither of those teams were going to use either of them well.
 
Welker. And I won't change my mind until Woodhead puts up consecutive 100 catch or 1500 yard rushing seasons. There is no comparison between the two of them. We still don't know what Woodhead can do in the playoffs or if he is going to have an injury bug. That said, the Jets missed out big time.

IIRC, we picked Faulk with a 2nd rounder. A better question would be, which use of a second rounder has benefited the Patriots more, Faulk or Welker?
 
I'd say it was a much worse mistake for the JEST since they just cut him and got nothing.

Pats really stole Welker from the Phins with the poison pill.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Monday Patriots Notebook 4/15: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-14, Mock Draft 3.0, Gilmore, Law Rally For Bill 
Potential Patriot: Boston Globe’s Price Talks to Georgia WR McConkey
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/12: News and Notes
Not a First Round Pick? Hoge Doubles Down on Maye
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/11: News and Notes
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft #5 and Thoughts About Dugger Signing
Matthew Slater Set For New Role With Patriots
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/10: News and Notes
Patriots Draft Rumors: Teams Facing ‘Historic’ Price For Club to Trade Down
Back
Top