PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Dancing on NY "Journalists"(Update on William C. Rhoden)


Status
Not open for further replies.

shmessy

Phoenix, AZ/Retired
PatsFans.com Supporter
Joined
Sep 13, 2004
Messages
30,681
Reaction score
23,359
Allow us to step on the amateurish NY journalists from major newspapers:

William C. Rhoden: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/07/sports/football/07rhoden.html
(*****This column was originally filed at 1:00pm the day of the game and was originally titled "The Day the Patriots Empire Began to Crumble" - in just the past hour several parts of it were changed to reflect what happened in the game and to save the hide of the writer who, believe me, was dancing on the grave of the Patriots earlier. Gutless coward.)

Gary Myers: Jets will beat Patriots Monday to seize control of AFC East, prove they're ready for Super Bowl run

Steve Serby: Why Jets will beat Patriots tonight - NYPOST.com
 
Last edited:
re: Dancing on NY "Journalists"(Update on William C. Rhoden)

1 thing worse than making stupid projections


not being man enough to admit them
 
re: Dancing on NY "Journalists"(Update on William C. Rhoden)

if rhoden wasn't such a homer he would admit the yankees are in decline and their ws require asterisks because steroids have a much larger affect on winning and losing than a camera would. players win games, not vcr's.
 
re: Dancing on NY "Journalists"(Update on William C. Rhoden)

NYT, war is peace...
 
re: Dancing on NY "Journalists"(Update on William C. Rhoden)

Rhoden says in his post-game article that when Kevin Faulk went down, the Patriots plugged in BJGE in his place. Since Rhoden doesn't know that Woodhead took the Faulk role, I would not expect he'd know much overall, to back up his predictions.
 
re: Dancing on NY "Journalists"(Update on William C. Rhoden)

Humble pie is good for the soul.. from teh Post:

Patriots make mouthy Jets speechless - NYPOST.com

FOXBOROUGH, Mass. – In the cold truth of the locker room, the chatter had been silenced, the swagger kneecapped. Players shook their heads a lot. They offered up explanations, understanding immediately that nobody wanted to hear excuses.

“It’s simple,” linebacker Calvin Pace said. “We were whupped.”

“We didn’t tackle them and we didn’t contain them,” safety Eric Smith whispered. “And against a good team you’re asking for trouble.”

Jets crash and burn in AFC East ‘showdown’ - NYPOST.com


FOXBOROUGH, Mass. — That hostile AFC East takeover the Jets were poised to execute against the Patriots?

That’ll have to wait for another day — maybe another decade.

As the Jets wake up this morning with a hangover, with their stunning 45-3 beat-down loss last night at Gillette Stadium still ringing in their heads, they’ll be staring up in the standings at the same team they’ve been looking up at for most of the last decade: Those damned Patriots.
 
re: Dancing on NY "Journalists"(Update on William C. Rhoden)

Allow us to step on the amateurish NY journalists from major newspapers:

William C. Rhoden: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/07/sports/football/07rhoden.html
(*****This column was originally filed at 1:00pm the day of the game and was originally titled "The Day the Patriots Empire Began to Crumble" - in just the past hour several parts of it were changed to reflect what happened in the game and to save the hide of the writer who, believe me, was dancing on the grave of the Patriots earlier. Gutless coward.)

Gary Myers: Jets will beat Patriots Monday to seize control of AFC East, prove they're ready for Super Bowl run

Steve Serby: Why Jets will beat Patriots tonight - NYPOST.com


Deplorable that the NYT article talks about cameragate and its pathetic that the writer has little idea what happened back then. :mad:

I am going to email that writer providing him quotes on BB's interview. Even if he doesn't come to senses, I hope it gets posted so that one or two non-Pats fan realize that stupid overreaction to the event called cameragate.
 
re: Dancing on NY "Journalists"(Update on William C. Rhoden)

Here is Rhoden's article. Posting it here so he can't get away from his lack of professionalism. You can write anything you want, but don't pretend you never wrote it.

C/P NY Times
Sports of The Times
By WILLIAM C. RHODEN

Published: December 6, 2010


In the days leading up to his team’s showdown with New England, Jets Coach Rex Ryan went out of his way to praise Bill Belichick, the Patriots’ dour head coach.

Ryan called Belichick the best in the business and a respected opponent.

“I think he’s the No. 1 coach in this league,” Ryan said. “That’s undisputable. He’s smart. He gets his team going every year. He’s a great evaluator of talent. I do admire him, as a son of a coach. Do I want to be like him? No, I want to be like myself, but I want to have the success that he’s had through the years.”

Normally unrestrained in heaping praise on his team, Ryan was careful with his remarks about Belichick and the Patriots. It was as if he wanted to play down the perception that a shift in power was taking place.

Too late. The shift has occurred: the Jets are in ascendancy, while New England is in retrograde, though it has nothing to do with one game, one season, injuries or upheaval.

The shift was set in motion three seasons ago by a moral misstep by Belichick. The Patriots empire began to unravel the day New England was caught cheating.

After an opening-season game between the Jets and the Patriots in September 2007, Eric Mangini, the Jets’ head coach at the time, reported New England for videotaping the Jets’ defensive signals. The Jets confiscated the tape and turned it over to the N.F.L.

The scandal, which came to be called Spygate, put New England and Belichick under a cloud, though by 2007 several teams had begun to suspect the Patriots were taping opposing coaches.

The Packers caught New England in the act in 2006 but never took the complaint further. Belichick was believed to be taping opponents when Mangini was a member of the Patriots’ defensive staff under Belichick between 2000 and 2005.

The N.F.L. fined Belichik $500,000 and the team $250,000 and took away a first-round pick in the 2008 draft.

But the Patriots and Belichick lost more than money. New England lost some of its luster as a first-class organization. While no one doubts Belichick’s coaching genius, he lost a measure of respect for violating the sanctity of sportsmanship and the integrity of competition.

Belichick also sent a troubling message to his protégés.

One of them, Mangini, reacted by turning in his old boss. But another, Josh McDaniels, was caught in the ambition trap — perhaps as Belichick was.

Last month the N.F.L. fined McDaniels, the Denver Broncos’ head coach, $50,000, and the franchise another $50,000 when it learned the team’s director of video operations had recorded six minutes of the San Francisco 49ers’ walk-through the day before the two teams met in London on Oct. 31.

The employee was Steve Scarnecchia, identified by the N.F.L. as one of those who made improper videotapes while employed by the Patriots. McDaniels was a member of Belichick’s staff during the Super Bowl years; so was Scarnecchia.

Why would McDaniels hire Scarnecchia? Did he do it out of loyalty, or because he felt he needed the sort of edge that Scarnecchia could provide?

McDaniels said he never watched the tape and the N.F.L. said it believed him. McDaniels was fined because he did not immediately report Scarnecchia to Broncos executives. Why were the Patriots fined $750,000 in 2007 and stripped of a draft pick and Denver only $50,000?

In explaining the differences in the fines in a recent conference call, the N.F.L.’s general counsel, Jeff Pash, offered a chilling indictment of the Patriots. He said the league believed the Denver episode was isolated and perpetrated by a single person who did not receive direction from a superior.

“You have a single incident as opposed to years of activity,” Pash said.

Years of activity.

On the other hand, New England has not won a championship since the Jets turned Belichick in for cheating. Is this a coincidence? Or in a league in which winning and losing hang by such a slender thread, can the loss of a camera be the difference between them? The Patriots lost the Super Bowl to the Giants by the narrowest of margins, just as they had won their three Super Bowls by a combined 9 points.

The unanswered question is what level of conceit or insecurity prompted Belichick to cheat. We may only know that when Belichick writes the ultimate autobiography. Meanwhile, we continue to refer to Belichick as a genius, and one of the great coaches in N.F.L. history.

New England will not be defined by the spying fiasco. The Patriots don’t need to win another championship to validate themselves, nor does Belichick. He has three Super Bowl rings as validation.

But Spygate left a stain that will not be washed away by victories and even championships.
 
re: Dancing on NY "Journalists"(Update on William C. Rhoden)

Here is Rhoden's article. Posting it here so he can't get away from his lack of professionalism. You can write anything you want, but don't pretend you never wrote it.

This was an odd one -- I saw it online yesterday and it made no sense; no context and the "Patriots in retrograde" thing was bizarre. Between it being taken down yesterday then re-appearing with a topper about last night's game, makes me think this was posted by accident. Only guessing, but it's as if someone wrote some background material anticipating a Jets win and it got posted in error. Still, it's bizarre - -even if the Pats had lost it would have been hard to writ of them being in decline. Says a lot about the guy's thought process.
 
re: Dancing on NY "Journalists"(Update on William C. Rhoden)

This was an odd one -- I saw it online yesterday and it made no sense; no context and the "Patriots in retrograde" thing was bizarre. Between it being taken down yesterday then re-appearing with a topper about last night's game, makes me think this was posted by accident. Only guessing, but it's as if someone wrote some background material anticipating a Jets win and it got posted in error. Still, it's bizarre - -even if the Pats had lost it would have been hard to writ of them being in decline. Says a lot about the guy's thought process.

I don't know that it was posted in error. I guess he was just embarrassed to have written such a baseless article. They also disabled all comments so nobody can call him out any further...
 
re: Dancing on NY "Journalists"(Update on William C. Rhoden)

Here is Rhoden's article. Posting it here so he can't get away from his lack of professionalism. You can write anything you want, but don't pretend you never wrote it.

Normally, I would have to take down a full article that is pasted here. But, since that article as such was 50% edited and no longer exists on the NYT, I say good on you. I had been searching myself for the original version after the game and cursed that coward and his paper for weaseling out and eliminating half the original article.

A "Profile in Courage" and truth, William C. Rhoden isn't. Simply, a pathetic and epic failure.
 
re: Dancing on NY "Journalists"(Update on William C. Rhoden)

Just in case, I sent the article to my PM, in case you have to delete it and others want it for future reference.
 
re: Dancing on NY "Journalists"(Update on William C. Rhoden)

I don't know that it was posted in error. I guess he was just embarrassed to have written such a baseless article. They also disabled all comments so nobody can call him out any further...

Embarrassingly bad. I don't read NYT Sports folks very often and I can't say that'll be changing any time soon.
 
re: Dancing on NY "Journalists"(Update on William C. Rhoden)

Just in case, I sent the article to my PM, in case you have to delete it and others want it for future reference.

Sorry, I will take it down if I'm violating copyrights or anything. I figured since I was giving the original author credit and quoting it it would be alright.
 
re: Dancing on NY "Journalists"(Update on William C. Rhoden)

In other news, William C. Rhoden reports that Dewey beat Truman and that the Germans actually won WW II.
 
re: Dancing on NY "Journalists"(Update on William C. Rhoden)

I always find it interesting how those who are so outraged by Spygate (as Bill Rhoden obvious is) will never drill down to exactly what advantage taping signals brought to the Patriots. There is always this assumption that it was a significant advantage - and yet no significant advantage has ever been shown.

I'm very aware that during the Spygate discussions, there was tremendous speculation on 1 thing and 1 thing only - that the Patriots were using these tapes to determine signals during the game and then taking advantage of that in the second half. The reason that this was practically the sole substance of the use of these tapes is that it was pretty obvious even to unsophisticated observers that attempting to use signals months or years later - particularly against teams that knew or thought that you were taping or somehow stealing signals - was of such marginal value as to be almost worthless. After all, signals by a 3rd base coach or by a catcher in baseball can also be seen by everybody and everyone knows that you need to change them up in order not to give things away. I'd hardly think that football coaches are dumber than baseball coaches. And yet after the evidence conclusively proved that this was not the case, the perception remained that this was a significant advantage both because the Patriots won and because the NFL chose to levy a huge penalty. What still has not be adequately reasoned out is exactly how this information (which can also be obtained in other LEGAL methods) can be of significant help in winning games.

That being said, Rhoden always confronts the Spygate issue on a moral grounds basis i.e. cheating is always wrong. So is intentional cheating by holding morally wrong? Is intentionally cheating by blocking someone in the back morally wrong? Is intentionally cheating by tampering with players (think NY Jets) or coaches (think NY Jets again :) ) morally wrong? What kind of cheating in Rhoden's world is morally wrong? As far as I can tell, videotaping signals is one of the few ways of cheating that is morally wrong in his eyes - even if the advantages gained are minimal at best and even if most (if not the vast majority) of teams have done this form of cheating in the (sometimes distant, sometimes not so distant) past. Does this stain all teams from the 70s and 80s? Or just 1 team from the 2000s? Rhoden seems to proposition the latter and, at best, ignore the former.

Of course, a fairer assessment of it all would show this article for what it truly is - a hatchet job. I actually don't believe that Rhoden means it that way or even that he is not sincere. I've often watched him on Sports Reporters and believe in his sincerity. However, his moral reasoning is, as best as I can tell, woefully inadequate in order to render the judgment he does on both Bill Belichick and the Patriots.
 
re: Dancing on NY "Journalists"(Update on William C. Rhoden)

TruthSeeker(s) - A few of us call that entire episode 'Cameragate', as it should rightly be tagged.

Unfortunate that many Patsfans continue to use the mediots spin of 'spying' and give the episode a clandestine (=> negative) slant when it doesn't deserve any.
 
Last edited:
re: Dancing on NY "Journalists"(Update on William C. Rhoden)

Fascinating....I went to the NYT this AM to see what they were saying about the beat-down, and read Rhoden's column, not knowing how it was changed from the original column which had run. I thought it was clueless and classless to run a column about "spygate" after such a colossal loss...and now, to find out that the column ran before the game, and they simply changed a few paragraghs around....that is even more clueless and classless if you ask me. I expcet that stuff form the NY Post..but from the Times? wow.

But, I also read the other aritcles cited above...my favorite part is from the last one...where the article says:


“It took a blow when Jim went down today,” Eric Smith said Friday night. “But we have confidence in our guys that are gonna step in. It’s not like we have rookies just stepping off the bus out there to play. So I think once we get through tomorrow, our confidence level will be back up where it was.”

Smith will now become the quarterback of the defense. He had a 3.95 GPA in high school.


A 3.95 in high school? Lets see, there was the A in shop class, and an A in gym, and an A in health.... LMFAO...
And what did he get for grades in the third grade?
 
re: Dancing on NY "Journalists"(Update on William C. Rhoden)

****Alright! Now, we've got traction on this story as Bostonsportsmedia.com has picked up on it this afternoon:

That website is followed by writers around the nation so Mr. Rhoden's integrity is about to be publicly called out on this

Boston Sports Media Watch
______________________________

Odd Column Changes From NY Times


"I had seen William Rhoden’s column in The New York Times yesterday, and like this emailer, I was somewhat surprised to see it get remade at the same URL following the Patriots beatdown of Jets:

Hi Bruce,

I’m a regular BSMW reader, and as such I thought you might be interested in something I caught in the NYT coverage of the Jets-Pats rivalry. On the Times’ site yesterday, I saw this column from William Rhoden.

That article no longer exists on the Times’ site; it’s been replaced, at the same URL, with this. (The modified article went up within a few minutes of last night’s game ending.) You’ll notice the new headline no longer references the Patriots’ “crumbling empire;” similar changes are made throughout the article.

Now, to my mind, these are both cases of pretty crappy journalism, using the thinnest of pretenses to bring up Spygate without really saying anything new. However, it’s my understanding that the Times’ policy is to note corrections, changes, or updates to articles like this instead of just throwing lines like “The shift has occurred: the Jets are in ascendancy, while New England is in retrograde” down the memory hole.

I’d be interested to hear your thoughts on this.

Best,
D

PS: One more amusing modification. Rhoden, pre-game: “The shift was set in motion three seasons ago by a moral misstep by Belichick. The Patriots empire began to unravel the day New England was caught cheating.” Rhoden, post-game: “If New England does not win another title under Belichick, critics can say that a shift took place three seasons ago.” Hedging his bets, I guess.
 
Last edited:
Re: Dancing on NY "Journalists'"

I am sick of the whole Spygate/Camragate thing. There are a couple of facts that they failed to mention.

1) The Patriots were "caught" 8 minutes into the game. They went on to crush the all the regular season opponents. Also they were heavily monitored by the NFL for the rest of the season, so the supposed "cheating" was a moot point.

2) Steve Scarnecchia was actually an employee of the J-E-T-S in 2007 under Mangini, and was the one who turned the Patriots in.

I hate the way the media tends to gloss over these things. Not to mention a first round draft pick was a huge loss. BB probably would have traded it for a couple of later rounds and maybe a 3rd in the following year.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.


Patriots Kraft ‘Involved’ In Decision Making?  Zolak Says That’s Not the Case
MORSE: Final First Round Patriots Mock Draft
Slow Starts: Stark Contrast as Patriots Ponder Which Top QB To Draft
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/24: News and Notes
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/23: News and Notes
MORSE: Final 7 Round Patriots Mock Draft, Matthew Slater News
Bruschi’s Proudest Moment: Former LB Speaks to MusketFire’s Marshall in Recent Interview
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/22: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-21, Kraft-Belichick, A.J. Brown Trade?
MORSE: Patriots Draft Needs and Draft Related Info
Back
Top