- Joined
- Dec 4, 2006
- Messages
- 16,482
- Reaction score
- 1,343
We all know that Mark Sanchez has been struggling so far this year,but in last year's meetings with the young QB against the Pats we saw a very promising QB of the future in week 2 of 2009 almost outplaying Brady in that 16-9 victory with an outstanding 101 rating,then in week 10 we saw a very different almost insecure version of the same guy who got burned for 4 INTs and a 38 QB rating
Sanchez had a below average start to his career but he did have a Jeckyl and Hyde year where he looked decent one week and horrid the next
Last years games vs the Patriots
Week 2 - 14 of 22 passing for 163 Yards and a 101.1 QB Rating - 1 TD and ZERO INTs - He was calm and cool especially for a rookie,made no mistakes and was very comfortable in control of his offense,looked at that time like the Jets may have found thier QB of the future and possibly rookie of the year
Week 10 - 8 of 21 passing for 136 Yards and a 38.1 QB Rating - 1 TD and 4 INTs - He was extremely poor in his decisions and was forcing throws into tight coverage and looked like he was not ready for the NFL
What is your argument as to why we will see the 2009 Week 10s version of Mr Sanchez and not the 2009 Week 2 version?
Sanchez had a below average start to his career but he did have a Jeckyl and Hyde year where he looked decent one week and horrid the next
Last years games vs the Patriots
Week 2 - 14 of 22 passing for 163 Yards and a 101.1 QB Rating - 1 TD and ZERO INTs - He was calm and cool especially for a rookie,made no mistakes and was very comfortable in control of his offense,looked at that time like the Jets may have found thier QB of the future and possibly rookie of the year
Week 10 - 8 of 21 passing for 136 Yards and a 38.1 QB Rating - 1 TD and 4 INTs - He was extremely poor in his decisions and was forcing throws into tight coverage and looked like he was not ready for the NFL
What is your argument as to why we will see the 2009 Week 10s version of Mr Sanchez and not the 2009 Week 2 version?
Last edited: