PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

2011 Draft Pick tracking


Status
Not open for further replies.

fester

Third String But Playing on Special Teams
Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Messages
530
Reaction score
88
Figure I might as well start this thread.

Oakland, lost to Tennessee, record 0-1, 1st round pick between #1 and #16

Carolina, lost to Giants, record 0-1, 2nd round pick between #33 and #48

Saints beat Vikings, record 1-0, 6th round pick 180s or 190s
 
hahah i like where those 1st 2 picks are heading
 
Next week Carolina hosts Tampa and Oakland hosts St. Louis. They should both win so they'll be middle of the pack after next week.

In week 3 though, Carolina hosts Cincy and Oakland goes to Arizona. No cupcake games there for those teams.
 
Next week Carolina hosts Tampa and Oakland hosts St. Louis. They should both win so they'll be middle of the pack after next week.

In week 3 though, Carolina hosts Cincy and Oakland goes to Arizona. No cupcake games there for those teams.

I think Bradford can take the Radiers.
 
This is going to be fun to follow. I think if Oakland won a couple of games they would get a tremendous boost in confidence. But, if they struggle out of the gate. It will seem like the same old Raiders(lately that is); struggling qb, coaching controversy(Crable on hotseat) and no hope on horizon. No playmakers on offense and a senile, old owner.
 
Very nice...you beat me to the post. Gotta love BB. As a fan, he gives you 12 months of total team interest. We get to chew on extra picks in the offseason, something I really enjoy
 
Next week Carolina hosts Tampa and Oakland hosts St. Louis. They should both win so they'll be middle of the pack after next week.

In week 3 though, Carolina hosts Cincy and Oakland goes to Arizona. No cupcake games there for those teams.

I agree that they should win their week 2 games but it's worth noting that Tampa somehow beat Cleveland, and Carolina may be without their starting QB due to concussions. And the Rams were pretty competitive against the Cardinals. I don't think either of those are layups.
 
I think Bradford can take the Radiers.

The Rams look absolutely desperate for WR's. I do not know how Bradford can beat the Raiders with Clayton (lacks fire), Amonadle(lacks speed) and Gilyard (Lacks experience) as the only WR's healthy on the roster.

On a lot of Bradford's passes yesterday, it looked like the WR's ran the wrong pattern.

It is so tough being a rookie QB, but to be a rookie QB on a team without a legitimate WR is so much worse.

And somewhere in the Raiders secondary is NNamdi.

On the other side of the coin, I see why BB tried to sign Fells last off season, big blocker and can catch a little.
 
Matt Moore is doubtful for Sunday's game. Jimmy Clausen is the back-up. He did start for 4 years in college in Charlie Weiss's offense. And he does have a good run game. Should be interesting.
 
Good news for everyone here. The Raiders looked terrible again. They do have some talented players so they'll get the odd upset here and again, plus they play some weak looking teams.

People overrated Jason Campbell. Just because he's not Jamarcus Russell, doesn't mean he's a good player.
 
After Week 2, the update:

1st Rounder from Raiders (1-1) between #9 and #24

2nd Rounder from Carolina (0-2) between #33 and #40

4th Rounder from Denver (1-1) between # 105 and #120

6th Rounder from New Orleans (2-0) late 190s/early 200s
 
Carolina will only win 3/4 games TOPS if there lucky.

Can you image if we had their #1 pick as well!
 
After Week 2, the update:

1st Rounder from Raiders (1-1) between #9 and #24

2nd Rounder from Carolina (0-2) between #33 and #40

4th Rounder from Denver (1-1) between # 105 and #120

6th Rounder from New Orleans (2-0) late 190s/early 200s

Nice work, Bro. :cool:

***

My expectations regarding Oakland are dampened by the accession of Gradkowski to the starting lineup...But I believe they still have a shot at Top 5, and even a fighting chance for #1, and might even be the Favorites. :eek:
 
Oakland at Arizona. Might be an interesting barometer for how bad the loser of this game is. No qb's on either roster.
 
Week 3 Update:
Oakland (1-2) 1st Rounder #6 to #13
Carolina (1-2) 2nd Rounder #33 to 38
Denver (1-2) 4th Rounder #103 to 109
New Orleans (2-1) 6th Rounder 190s
 
Update after five weeks; not going to bother getting into tiebreakers yet as it's way too early for that.

1st Round from Oakland (2-3): #8 - #12
1st Round New England (3-1): #25 - #28
2nd Round from Carolina (0-5): #33 - #35
2nd Round New England (3-1): #57 - #60
3rd Round from Minnesota (1-3): #70 - #71
3rd Round New England (3-1): #89 - #92
4th Round New England (3-1): #121 - #124

4th Round from Denver (2-3) would be #104 - #108.
Seattle gets whichever 4th round pick is better, so this pick goes to them.
Also, the 4th round picks could be later depending on compensatory picks.

As of this moment the Cowboys and Vikings would have top seven draft picks, while the Bucs and Chiefs would be among the last eight in draft order.
 
Regarding that first round pick, a bay area newspaper has some concerns about the Raiders' defense despite their win last week.

Oakland Raiders defense has sprung a leak - San Jose Mercury News

Not so long ago, the Raiders boasted of a defense that was among the league leaders in terms of average yards allowed. Now, they're allowing big yards and scrambling to plug holes.

The Raiders allowed 947 yards to the Houston Texans and San Diego Chargers over the past two games. That represents the most allowed by a Raiders defense in back-to-back games since the 1997 team -- which went 4-12 -- was gouged for 995 yards by the Denver Broncos and Seattle Seahawks.

In all, the Raiders have dropped from second in the NFL (260.7 yards allowed per game) after three games to tied for 23rd (345.8) after surrendering 441 yards to the Texans and 506 yards to the Chargers.

"My biggest concern right now for our defense is to play a complete game," Raiders coach Tom Cable said. "One week it's this, the next week it's that. Neither one of them is acceptable."

Against the Texans, the Raiders allowed 249 yards rushing. Chargers quarterback Philip Rivers torched the Raiders for 431 yards passing on Sunday.
Overall, the Raiders are 10th against the pass at 198 yards per game and 31st against the run at 147.8 yards per game.

They also are 28th in points allowed at 26.8 through five games, and the 31 points scored by the Texans and 27 by the Chargers are what concerns Asomugha the most, he said.
 
And things are looking good with that Carolina pick so far too.

Panthers find it hard to break losing cycle - CharlotteObserver.com

The Carolina Panthers' offensive linemen can stop counting now.

The math isn't much fun, anyway. The numbers don't work:

Eight defensive players jammed near the line of scrimmage - which is at least one more than Carolina has available to block, unless the Panthers are in a two-back, two-tight end set.

That defensive strategy - combined with Carolina's youth at quarterback and receiver - has plunged the Panthers to the bottom of the NFL's offensive statistics and produced the third 0-5 start in team history.

Carolina has scored a league-low 52 points - by far the lowest total in franchise history through five games.

With one exception, the Panthers' games have unfolded in a predictable, nauseating pattern:

Carolina's offense tries to establish a running attack, the backbone of a John Fox-coached team.

Defense counters by stacking the box with as many as nine defenders.

Rookie quarterback Jimmy Clausen (and Matt Moore before him) is faced with too many second-and-8 and third-and-long situations.

With top receiver Steve Smith doubled (or last week vs. Chicago, injured), rookies David Gettis and Brandon LaFell fail to get open and/or make the catch.

Panthers trail in the second half, and are forced to throw to try to catch up.

Defenses take more chances with blitzes.

Bad things happen to Clausen and Moore (see turnovers, head injuries, et al).

Repeat the following week.

In the rest of the article Trent Dilfer discusses his recommendations to overcome that dilemma; hopefully John Fox is not listening.
 
Update after six weeks and the win over the Ravens; still too early to bother getting into tiebreakers.

1st Round from Oakland (2-4): #7 - #9
1st Round New England (4-1): #30 - #31
2nd Round from Carolina (0-5): #33 - #34
2nd Round New England (4-1): #62 - #63
3rd Round from Minnesota (2-3): #74 - #75
3rd Round New England (4-1): #94 - #95
4th Round New England (4-1): #126 - #127

4th Round from Denver (2-4) would be #103 - #105.
Seattle gets whichever 4th round pick is better, so this pick goes to them.



I'd say the Raiders moving closer to #1 while the Pats choice gets closer to #32 is a win-win.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Patriots Kraft ‘Involved’ In Decision Making?  Zolak Says That’s Not the Case
MORSE: Final First Round Patriots Mock Draft
Slow Starts: Stark Contrast as Patriots Ponder Which Top QB To Draft
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/24: News and Notes
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/23: News and Notes
MORSE: Final 7 Round Patriots Mock Draft, Matthew Slater News
Bruschi’s Proudest Moment: Former LB Speaks to MusketFire’s Marshall in Recent Interview
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/22: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-21, Kraft-Belichick, A.J. Brown Trade?
MORSE: Patriots Draft Needs and Draft Related Info
Back
Top