swheeler23
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2007
- Messages
- 2,062
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Wow. I'm about ready to say we're officially ****ed.
As I asked in another thread and got no responses, can anyone describe a realistic scenario where Mankins isn't starting week 1? For a situation to be "realistic", you have to explain how Mankins benefits from that course of action.
so, they gonna just forget about mankins? maybe see him waddle in some time in october, sign his tender......and then what? you think that's good for the pats?
The fact that Mankin must make a decision doesnt mean it must be a good one.As I asked in another thread and got no responses, can anyone describe a realistic scenario where Mankins isn't starting week 1? For a situation to be "realistic", you have to explain how Mankins benefits from that course of action.
As I asked in another thread and got no responses, can anyone describe a realistic scenario where Mankins isn't starting week 1? For a situation to be "realistic", you have to explain how Mankins benefits from that course of action.
As I asked in another thread and got no responses, can anyone describe a realistic scenario where Mankins isn't starting week 1? For a situation to be "realistic", you have to explain how Mankins benefits from that course of action.
Given what just happened to Dumervil, why should Mankins cave at this point, when the money involved is relative peanuts since the team slashed the tender?