3rd for one year rental of Boldin/Burgess which do you prefer?

[SanAngeloState]

Which team got a better deal? 3rd for Boldin or 3rd for Burgess? Actually it was a 3rd and 5th for Burgess, I believe.

 

[alvinnf]

When if's and buts are candies and nutz we'll all have a wonderful x-mas!

 

[patsinthesnow]

Your a jets fan in disguise. Get off the forum. One of the posters exposed you by showing you ballwash the jets during the AFCCG and calling Mark Sanchez "heroic".

All your posts are negative trash, GFY.

 

[BritPat]

Which team got a better deal? 3rd for Boldin or 3rd for Burgess? Actually it was a 3rd and 5th for Burgess, I believe.

Big difference. Boldin wanted a new contract for a start. And Burgess, who looked good down the stretch, might well be back.

But keep on trolling.

 

[SanAngeloState]

Your a jets fan in disguise. Get off the forum. One of the posters exposed you by showing you ballwash the jets during the AFCCG and calling Mark Sanchez "heroic".

All your posts are negative trash, GFY.

I don't remember ballwashing anyone let alone the jets. I was rooting for them in the CG, as I don't like the colts. That makes me a jets "fan"? LOL.

He was heroic compared to the dog crap people on here said he was.

I won't get off the forum, you get off. I'm trying to help the team through cold hearted logic, you are just being a "fan".:rocker:

 

[SanAngeloState]

Big difference. Boldin wanted a new contract for a start. And Burgess, who looked good down the stretch, might well be back.

But keep on trolling.

He wanted it, but didn'[t get it. I'm sure Burgess wants a new contract too. Really valuable guy that burgess

 

[livinginthe past]

I don't remember ballwashing anyone let alone the jets. I was rooting for them in the CG, as I don't like the colts. That makes me a jets "fan"? LOL.

He was heroic compared to the dog crap people on here said he was.

I won't get off the forum, you get off. I'm trying to help the team through cold hearted logic, you are just being a "fan".:rocker:

You need to apply for an actual position with the organisation.

I'd hate to think you were spending your time 'helping the team' on a message board when you could have much better access to Belichick himself by being part of the coaching team.

You should expect some resistance to your righteous 'cold hearted logic', though.

Belichick has something of a reputation as an overly emotional softie in league circles.

 

[The_Riddler]

To quote Kevin Weeks of Southie: Never let facts get in the way of a good story..........

Any and all bad BB FA decisions and/or draft decisions are not allowed to be discussed...........

 

[Rob0729]

What does it matter? The Pats couldn't get Boldin because Boldin wasn't interested in being an one year rental. He could have made the trade not go through since he knew the Ravens were willing to give him an extension and the Pats weren't. Two very different situations.

People need to stop these ridiculous comparisons. If the issues wasn't the extension, Boldin might be a Patriot right now. The Pats were not going to trade for a guy who might nor report because he didn't get a new deal.

 

[BritPat]

He wanted it, but didn'[t get it. I'm sure Burgess wants a new contract too. Really valuable guy that burgess

Huh? Did you miss the bit where the Ravens signed him to a 4 year $28M contract?

Burgess will want a new contract, but it won't be anywhere near what Boldin wants.

 

[Rob0729]

He wanted it, but didn'[t get it. I'm sure Burgess wants a new contract too. Really valuable guy that burgess

Umm, Boldin absolutely got an extension. Or dd the Ravens give Boldin an extra $25 million in a per diem? You Jets fans masquerading as Pats fans really need to keep up with current events.

Boldin isn't a Patriot right now because they didn't want to give him an extension in the trade. With multipe teams bidding on him, he has that leverage to steer where he wants to go.

As for Burgess, he wanted out of Oakland. He was happy to come here whether it was with a new deal or not.

 

[Rob0729]

To quote Kevin Weeks of Southie: Never let facts get in the way of a good story..........

Any and all bad BB FA decisions and/or draft decisions are not allowed to be discussed...........

Well, at last you trolls admit you ignore the facts to bash the Patriots. Most rational people here actually listen to the facts before we decide to bash or not, but as you admit, facts just get in your way to bash.

Here are some facts for you:

- Multiple teams were bidding on Boldin
- The Pats appeared to be the only team interested in Burgess
- Chris Mortensen reported the Pats wanted Boldin to play on his current contract
- The Ravens gave Boldin a very lucrative extension

Take away those facts and Belichick thought Burgess was worth more than Boldin. But please, don't let the facts get in the way of a good bashing. Any intelligent person knows that if Belichick had a 3rd rounder and could trade it for Boldin for one year or Burgess for one year, he would have picked Boldin. That isn't what his options were.

 

[eom]

ummmm....didn't boldin get a 4 yr deal?

wtf are you talking about one year rental?

 

[Gunnails]

Mark Sanchez is heroic.

 

[The_Riddler]

Well, at last you trolls admit you ignore the facts to bash the Patriots. Most rational people here actually listen to the facts before we decide to bash or not, but as you admit, facts just get in your way to bash.

Here are some facts for you:

- Multiple teams were bidding on Boldin
- The Pats appeared to be the only team interested in Burgess
- Chris Mortensen reported the Pats wanted Boldin to play on his current contract
- The Ravens gave Boldin a very lucrative extension

Take away those facts and Belichic thought Burgess was worth more than Boldin.

Ah now that we're talking facts, truth and honesty then give me your honest opinion about trading our 3rd for Burgess ? Was it a good move or a not so good move?, I'll put it into as basic a question as possible. We await your honest response ?

 

[BelichickFan]

This Burgess thing has gotten stupid. The trade didn't work out, we'd all love to have that draft pick back right now. But it was just before the season, we had no pass rush and we were trying to make the team better with what looked like a proven pass rusher.

Would I make that trade again now ? No.
Would I make that trade again back in August ? Yes.

 

[SanAngeloState]

Umm, Boldin absolutely got an extension. Or dd the Ravens give Boldin an extra $25 million in a per diem? You Jets fans masquerading as Pats fans really need to keep up with current events.

Boldin isn't a Patriot right now because they didn't want to give him an extension in the trade. With multipe teams bidding on him, he has that leverage to steer where he wants to go.

As for Burgess, he wanted out of Oakland. He was happy to come here whether it was with a new deal or not.

Well that is a good point. We should have waited for him to be cut or give up a 5th, but not a 3rd. 3rd rounders are gold.

and burgess sucks so why did we get him again? again, BB's judge of talent isn't that good for some reason. HE overvalues veterans even washed up stiffs like burgess.

 

[BritPat]

Well that is a good point. We should have waited for him to be cut or give up a 5th, but not a 3rd. 3rd rounders are gold.

and burgess sucks so why did we get him again? again, BB's judge of talent isn't that good for some reason. HE overvalues veterans even washed up stiffs like burgess.

You could have simply said "yeah, sorry this thread sucks harder than my mom".

Oh well.

 

[SanAngeloState]

You could have simply said "yeah, sorry this thread sucks harder than my mom".

Oh well.

So now you're making "mother jokes"? WTF? Real classy, homer.

 

[BritPat]

So now you're making "mother jokes"? WTF? Real classy, homer.

After seeing your previous 244 posts - it's right at your level, troll.

Please, go back to JI or Gang Green or wherever you're from. You can celebrate the Cromartie trade with your buddies.