So wait, you're telling me that NOTHING against the rules was done during SpyGate, and the NFL investigated and handed out penalties based on nothing where no rules were broken, and that the whole thing was because people are jealous of the Pats?
EXACTLY. If you want to refute this, go ahead, what rule was broken?
NFL Memo: "Video taping of any type, including but not limited to taping of an opponent's offensive or defensive signals, is prohibited on the sidelines, in the coaches' booth, in the locker room, or at any other locations accessible to club staff members during the game." What does prohibited mean in New England?
And you found 100 results in Google about the Colts. But 'spygate' returns over 100,000 and 'pats cheating' returns over 200,000.
Irrelevant. What's your point? I didn't say what the results of a search were, I said I found that many references to it. The responses to the search were in the hundreds of thousands.
So you're telling me you personally filtered through hundreds of thousands of results and found 100 specific references, all in a matter of minutes? Either you're superman or you're full of it. Please provide me with the search string you used.
And your evidence is that Phil Simms said it was hot?
Laughable.
No, what's laughable is that you deliberately ignored the link I showed you. It was 85 degrees that day, that much is undeniable. There are plenty of news reports that showed that.
I read your article, and like I said, it was all conjecture. Was it hot? Sure, I guess. But the Colts played in that same heat. Maybe something was broken? Maybe someone made a mistake? How can you possibly say there is any evidence it was done intentionally? Like I said, you should be a lawyer.
Face it, the Pats got caught actually doing something. Every other team has that on you. Did it matter, almost certainly not. And anyone who spouts off on the 'Cheatriots' or SpyGate winning rings has probably never seen the Pats play.
But it is JUST as stupid, maybe even more so, to be constantly pointing to things that are purely based on conjecture. Anything where "Phil Simms said" is the lead in to your evidence, is probably something you should just keep to yourself! lol
The conspiracy theories here run deep. Very deep. I'd love to hear the opinions of some people here on the moon landings, the Kennedy assassination, Paul McCartney being dead, etc.
I notice you didn't bother trying to refute the fact its as stupid to point to all this stuff as it is for other fans to point to the 'cheatriots'. Also, I'm glad you haven't tried to defend the crowd noise thing either. Another example of something based purely on conjecture with no real evidence.
This embeded quotes and colors thing is fun.