SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Have at it, gentlemen! My contribution: Hey, we didn't know who Logan Mankins was, either!
I watched this mountain play at Houston. First off he is nasty, a true mauler type. He played on the left and right side at Houston but he projects to ROT in the pros.
He has not played the game long so he still has a lot of upside.
As a pass defender, he will struggle with speed rushers but once he gets long arms and his huge hands on an opponent, he usually win, game over. He is almost impossible to bull rush because he does a decent job of sinking his hips for such a huge man.
As a run blocker, he is not a flat backed drive blocker (because he is 6'8" tall), but he is a decent mauler that will blow DE's and DT's off the LOS.
And again he blocks to the last echo of the whistle and is NASTY!!!!!!!
I think that once he gets coached up, Pats fans are going to love the kid.
He had an excellent pro day from all reports. 5.1 40, 36.5 vert, 32 reps.
He was the highest rated player not invited to the combine.
I watched this mountain play at Houston. First off he is nasty, a true mauler type. He played on the left and right side at Houston but he projects to ROT in the pros.
He has not played the game long so he still has a lot of upside.
As a pass defender, he will struggle with speed rushers but once he gets long arms and his huge hands on an opponent, he usually win, game over. He is almost impossible to bull rush because he does a decent job of sinking his hips for such a huge man.
As a run blocker, he is not a flat backed drive blocker (because he is 6'8" tall), but he is a decent mauler that will blow DE's and DT's off the LOS.
And again he blocks to the last echo of the whistle and is NASTY!!!!!!!
I think that once he gets coached up, Pats fans are going to love the kid.
I don't question any of this and he very well might develop into a solid starting RT or he might not. Bottom line is that regardless of what he can be, he was taken a tad early don't you think ?
I mean crap, we do have 4 - 3's, do ya think we could have used the last 3 to take this kid.
maybe, maybe not.
I see a lot of this kind of commentary, and I don't understand any of it.
the smart thing to do is to get your guys -- not get them to line up w/some analyst's mock.
let me ask you this:
who is it we should have drafted instead of vollmer, and why can't we use one of our thirds to draft that guy?
you have no idea whether or not we would have gotten him tomorrow.
get your guys.
I guess it's never wise to argue w/a guy who has a crystal ball up his ass.
who should we have taken over vollmer?
regardless of what he can be, he was taken a tad early don't you think ?
I mean crap, we do have 4 - 3's, do ya think we could have used the last 3 to take this kid.