carolinatony
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2006
- Messages
- 2,844
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Both can be addressed Day Two.
:agree: Deep TE and OL classes this year. Definitely should be available hlep in Rounds 3 and up.
And, oh, to answer the thread, OL. A team needs a stout OL much more than a productive TE.
Both can be addressed Day Two.
OK, so if they end up with 6 picks in the first three rounds and OL & TE are second day picksd. Who exactly do they take with the first 6 picks?
I think the OL is a higher priority than TE, and can see at least one OL being taken in the first three rounds. Preferably an OG, as I see grooming someone to take Neal's spot a higher priority than OT.
As our clinician noted, Day One is two rounds where the Pats currently have 3 picks. As to who might the Pats target on Day One: Scout.com: 2009 NFL Draft RankingsOK, so if they end up with 6 picks in the first three rounds and OL & TE are second day picksd. Who exactly do they take with the first 6 picks?
I can't read this and not throw you a challenge flag - TE's are easier to replace than OL? This is 180 out from my observations, for example: Neal is the consensus starter whom fans expect to need replacement first (they may want other's replaced, but Neal is the most likely guy to wear down first), he's both the "old man" on the line and has the thickest medical file. Without going anywhere but the current NEP roster there are numerous options available to replace him - Connelly, Yates (yeh, I know, but he's there), Kaczur, O'Callaghan, LeVoir, Wendell. In the draft, this is shaping up to be a deep draft for OL and a RG could be acquired from the pool of Centers and Tackles too. It's not so tough.watson and thomas are still under contract for 2009, and TE's are easier to replace than OL's, so OL should be a bigger priority come draft day, but its all about who is available when you draft
. Round two #58. If his stock rises after the Combine, I'm targeting DL Jarron Gilbert here. If his Combine doesn't get him moving upward, I'll be looking to trade this pick forward into 2010.
There is no Sey equivalent in this draft class, next year's class has a much deeper pool of potential 3-4 DEs to consider, part of why I'm looking to roll a Day One pick forward.He looks a little light at 280lbs. Are you thinking he's Jarvis Green's replacement? If we're picking DL on day 1, I think we should prepare ourselves for life without Sey, because even if he resigns for a reasonable contract, it's not a safe bet he can stay healthy.