PATRIOT64
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2006
- Messages
- 3,773
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
I think we still could have lost the San Diego, Miami and Pittsburgh games, even with Brady & Co., so I voted 11-3, and I think we would have finished 13-3. With Brady, et al., I think we would have won the Indy and Jets games.
12-2 with both losses coming to the Dolphins and Steelers although I'm sure both games would have been much closer than they were.
I think we still could have lost the San Diego, Miami and Pittsburgh games, even with Brady & Co., so I voted 11-3, and I think we would have finished 13-3. With Brady, et al., I think we would have won the Indy and Jets games.
Who cares? We're not healthy. Injuries happen.
The question is so hypothetical as to be silly, but I took the bait and voted 12--2 because, from what I could tell, we would have lost the first Miami game no matter who was in the lineup and probably the Steeler's game as well.
I know, god forbid we discuss stuff on a message board.
I dont know, do you think they would have called that bogus "in the grasp" call that changed that entire game? (its bogus because of the superbowl) if brady had been in?