Wilfork refutes report of admission of being dirty player

[DaBruinz]

The truth hurts doesn't it money.

Except you didn't actually tell the truth.

 

[DaBruinz]

The evidence listed above is an indictment that's he's a dirty player. Most of that stuff is caught on film. If it was a criminal charge, he doesn't have much of a case.

WRONG.

You might want to get your facts straight for a change. But that's probably asking too much

 

[DaBruinz]

You guys were crying fowl when Brady went down did you not? Saying what Pollard did was dirty? That's how we felt when he hit Losman last year. The only difference is WILFORK ADMITTED IT WAS A CHEAP SHOT!

Wilfork did NOT admit anything. He was cheapshotted on the play by Brad Butler. Get your facts straight.

Just because you're an idiot and don't actually watch the games doesn't mean that we are the same as you.

 

[LeonPowe]

You guys were crying fowl

???

 

[Peekaboo]

Wilfork did NOT admit anything. He was cheapshotted on the play by Brad Badger. Get your facts straight.

Just because you're an idiot and don't actually watch the games doesn't mean that we are the same as you.

I'm the idiot? I'm not the one who is so blinded by homerism that I can't admit when my favorite teams players are dirty. It is well documented how many fines have been given to Wilfork and yet you fail to see what a danger he presents to the integrity of the game and players on opposing teams. If Trent Edwards get injured at the hands of this clown, mark my words, he will not play another down this season.

 

[emoney_33]

I'm the idiot? I'm not the one who is so blinded by homerism that I can't admit when my favorite teams players are dirty. It is well documented how many fines have been given to Wilfork and yet you fail to see what a danger he presents to the integrity of the game and players on opposing teams. If Trent Edwards get injured at the hands of this clown, mark my words, he will not play another down this season.

Ok now you are just a moron. A fine does not indicate a player is playing "dangerously". You are blinded by your patriots hatred.

 

[Ring 6]

You sure about that?



Patriots' DVD saved DT Wilfork from suspension by NFL

By Chris Mortensen
ESPN.com
(Archive)

Updated: November 4, 2008, 4:21 PM ET

* Comment
* Email
* Print

NFL commissioner Roger Goodell was poised to suspend New England Patriots defensive tackle Vince Wilfork due to his prior illegal hits over the past two seasons, but a DVD from the Patriots' video department helped save him from at least a forced week off this season, sources told ESPN.

Vince Wilfork

Wilfork

Wilfork's wife, Bianca, who joined Wilfork for the meeting, handed Goodell the DVD with a different camera angle that showed the alleged unnecessary roughness on Broncos quarterback Jay Cutler on a play in the Oct. 20 meeting between the Broncos and Patriots may not have been so rough. In the video, Cutler could be seen picking himself up and patting Wilfork on the helmet after the play.

Wilfork did accept blame on his controversial hit against Buffalo Bills quarterback J.P. Losman last season that injured Losman's knee. Upon review of the play during his meeting with the commissioner, Wilfork admitted he didn't realize the ball had left Losman's hand as early as it did but said he had no intent to make a late hit, sources said. That play drew a $12,500 fine.

The NFL did not have indisputable visual evidence that Wilfork hit Cutler in the head, as it first believed, but still determined that it was unnecessary roughness. Instead of a suspension, Wilfork was docked with a $35,000 fine.

Vince and Bianca Wilfork wrote a thank you letter to Goodell at the end of the week. They also copied Ray Anderson, senior vice president of football operations, and Gene Washington, director of football operations, who were instrumental in the disciplinary action.

Chris Mortensen is a senior NFL analyst for ESPN

THAT is what you consider an admission of guilt?
The fact that the ball was released earlier than he thought is an ADMISSION that he didnt see it released. He also ADMITTED he had no intent to make a late hit.

There you go, Vince Wilfork has plead guilty to the crime of not seeing the ball relesed by the QB on that play.WOW

 

[Deus Irae]

I'm the idiot? I'm not the one who is so blinded by homerism that I can't admit when my favorite teams players are dirty. It is well documented how many fines have been given to Wilfork and yet you fail to see what a danger he presents to the integrity of the game and players on opposing teams. If Trent Edwards get injured at the hands of this clown, mark my words, he will not play another down this season.

Look, I know you like to troll, but at least be factually accurate when you do so. Otherwise, you will end up getting :banned:

 

[Peekaboo]

Ok now you are just a moron. A fine does not indicate a player is playing "dangerously". You are blinded by your patriots hatred.

Are you kidding me?! My god, you are such a homer.

Everyone is aware of they eye gouge attempt on Brandon Jacobs (fine), the late hit behind the play on Jason Witten (got a fine), the Losman hit (fine), the Cutler “love tap” with his elbow (fine), the dangerous facemask yank on Michael Turner (fine). But he’s been doing this since his rookie year.

What part of the word FINE do you not understand? If a player is fined, it's for unnesessary roughness. Anything "unnesessary" is considered dangerous.

 

[Peekaboo]

Look, I know you like to troll, but at least be factually accurate when you do so. Otherwise, you will end up getting :banned:

The fines he received are well documented fact. Anything else?

 

[LuthierJr]

can we send this to the visiting locker room where the trolls belong?

 

[Sicilian]

Anything "unnesessary" is considered dangerous.

In that case, you are very dangerous to this forum.

 

[Deus Irae]

The fines he received are well documented fact. Anything else?

You claim that a fine somehow proves intent, however. That is factually inaccurate.

You claim there was an eye gouge attempt. That is factually inaccurate.

That's two clear examples right there.

 

[Peekaboo]

You claim that a fine somehow proves intent, however. That is factually inaccurate.

You claim there was an eye gouge attempt. That is factually inaccurate.

That's two clear examples right there.

You are right. A fine can't prove intent. But what about the Witten fine and the Turner fine? Was their any intent there?

 

[Deus Irae]

You are right. A fine can't prove intent. But what about the Witten fine and the Turner fine? Was their any intent there?

Given what my initial post was, who cares? I was posting about your factual inaccuracies, nothing more. This is a Patriots board. If you, as a fan of another team, insist on trolling the board with falsehoods, you'll be banned. That's just how it is, so I was letting you know.

 

[Peekaboo]

Given what my initial post was, who cares? I was posting about your factual inaccuracies, nothing more. This is a Patriots board. If you, as a fan of another team, insist on trolling the board with falsehoods, you'll be banned. That's just how it is, so I was letting you know.

What did I say that was inaccurate or not true?

 

[mgm79]

Are you kidding me?! My god, you are such a homer.

Everyone is aware of they eye gouge attempt on Brandon Jacobs (fine), the late hit behind the play on Jason Witten (got a fine), the Losman hit (fine), the Cutler “love tap” with his elbow (fine), the dangerous facemask yank on Michael Turner (fine). But he’s been doing this since his rookie year.

What part of the word FINE do you not understand? If a player is fined, it's for unnesessary roughness. Anything "unnesessary" is considered dangerous.

Brady was fined repeatedly last year, does that mean he is a dangerous/dirty player?

 

[DaBruinz]

You sure about that?



Patriots' DVD saved DT Wilfork from suspension by NFL

By Chris Mortensen
ESPN.com
(Archive)

Updated: November 4, 2008, 4:21 PM ET

* Comment
* Email
* Print

NFL commissioner Roger Goodell was poised to suspend New England Patriots defensive tackle Vince Wilfork due to his prior illegal hits over the past two seasons, but a DVD from the Patriots' video department helped save him from at least a forced week off this season, sources told ESPN.

Vince Wilfork

Wilfork

Wilfork's wife, Bianca, who joined Wilfork for the meeting, handed Goodell the DVD with a different camera angle that showed the alleged unnecessary roughness on Broncos quarterback Jay Cutler on a play in the Oct. 20 meeting between the Broncos and Patriots may not have been so rough. In the video, Cutler could be seen picking himself up and patting Wilfork on the helmet after the play.

Wilfork did accept blame on his controversial hit against Buffalo Bills quarterback J.P. Losman last season that injured Losman's knee. Upon review of the play during his meeting with the commissioner, Wilfork admitted he didn't realize the ball had left Losman's hand as early as it did but said he had no intent to make a late hit, sources said. That play drew a $12,500 fine.

The NFL did not have indisputable visual evidence that Wilfork hit Cutler in the head, as it first believed, but still determined that it was unnecessary roughness. Instead of a suspension, Wilfork was docked with a $35,000 fine.

Vince and Bianca Wilfork wrote a thank you letter to Goodell at the end of the week. They also copied Ray Anderson, senior vice president of football operations, and Gene Washington, director of football operations, who were instrumental in the disciplinary action.

Chris Mortensen is a senior NFL analyst for ESPN

Admitting that he didn't know that the ball had left Losman's hand and that he had no intention of making a late hit is NOT saying that he intentionally did it.

Fact is that Brad Butlerr BLOCKED Wilfork into Losman. I watched the play enough times. Deal with it.

 

[DaBruinz]

You are right. A fine can't prove intent. But what about the Witten fine and the Turner fine? Was their any intent there?

No. There wasn't.

 

[DaBruinz]

I'm the idiot? I'm not the one who is so blinded by homerism that I can't admit when my favorite teams players are dirty. It is well documented how many fines have been given to Wilfork and yet you fail to see what a danger he presents to the integrity of the game and players on opposing teams. If Trent Edwards get injured at the hands of this clown, mark my words, he will not play another down this season.

Yes, you ARE the one who is so blinded by homerism. Sorry, but Wilfork isn't my favorite player. That is Bruschi.

Its well documented that he's been fined. However, they've been bullsh!t fines. That's what you don't understand.

He doesn't present a danger to the integrity of the game. Idiots like yourself do because you don't understand the game and you aren't bright enough to understand what you are talking about.