BlitzFritz
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2006
- Messages
- 779
- Reaction score
- 97
I guess im in the minority based on the board today, but hear me out
1. The dink and dunk was a good game plan and pretty effective.
2. Chewing up max clock was also a key part of the plan and that made sense.
3. The part I thought was lame was the "take no risk" part of the gameplan
Take no risk was
-- running the ball on 3rd and 12
-- kicking a FG on 4th and 1
-- almost never stretching the field
IMO, the Pats did not play to win, they played to tie or not lose.
I think we can play conservatively, but also leave more room for boldness.
1. The dink and dunk was a good game plan and pretty effective.
2. Chewing up max clock was also a key part of the plan and that made sense.
3. The part I thought was lame was the "take no risk" part of the gameplan
Take no risk was
-- running the ball on 3rd and 12
-- kicking a FG on 4th and 1
-- almost never stretching the field
IMO, the Pats did not play to win, they played to tie or not lose.
I think we can play conservatively, but also leave more room for boldness.